Are Vx220 Prices Falling?
#21
Posted 23 May 2011 - 12:39 PM
#22
Posted 23 May 2011 - 12:45 PM
#23
Posted 23 May 2011 - 12:47 PM
I've been on the hunt for a little while now for a VX.
I found this car for sale that seems out of normal price ranges http://atsearch.auto...201120387550085
VAUXHALL VX220 2.2 16v , 2 Doors, Manual, Soft-Top, Petrol, 2003 53 Reg , 56,000 miles, Blue. Radio/CD, ABS, Alloy wheels, Lumbar support, Immobiliser, Sports seats, Alarm, Drivers airbag, Front head restraints, Solid Paint, Cloth seat trim, Front fog lights. Insurance Group:17, HPI CLEAR, £6,990
I've got my eye on a few VX's. But am getting more and more worried about resale values dropping over the next few years. Parker's price guide has VX's alot lower than advert prices.
What's everybody's thoughts on this topic?
that vx is crying out for some TLC. if your after a little project then take a look, its been for sale for a VERY long time so make sure its been looked after while on sale, fluid change oils, coolant ect, been run down the road once a week. I looked at that VX while i was buying, things to note, its a none standard exhorst and a rear colour. I think the screen is cracked? the whiper motor is not working..?
Good luck with your search
#24
Posted 23 May 2011 - 12:49 PM
#25
Posted 23 May 2011 - 12:54 PM
#26
Posted 23 May 2011 - 04:39 PM
#27
Posted 23 May 2011 - 07:02 PM
#28
Posted 23 May 2011 - 07:32 PM
#29
Posted 23 May 2011 - 07:38 PM
#30
Posted 23 May 2011 - 07:38 PM
#31
Posted 23 May 2011 - 07:51 PM
#32
Posted 23 May 2011 - 08:18 PM
#33
Posted 23 May 2011 - 08:27 PM
#34
Posted 23 May 2011 - 08:27 PM
As said already, you get what you pay for, buy a cheap one and expect bills. Buy a mint well maintained one but pay the premium. I no personally if i was to sell mine it would be for top whack or not at all! Not that i'm looking to sell though so it's all irrelevent.
#35
Posted 24 May 2011 - 06:48 AM
Edited by Deadlysub, 24 May 2011 - 07:01 AM.
#36
Posted 25 May 2011 - 07:21 PM
There's a few obvious reasons why there's a considerable price gap between NAs and turbos. The turbo is newer (only available from 2003) and considerably faster in a straight line but has the same fuel consumption, tax and insurance (just about). The price difference is easily justified because nobody would buy an NA if they could get a turbo for only a bit more.I think the gapbetween a good N/A and a good turbo are a but excessive.
It seems a good N/A demands £8k where as a decent turbo demands £12k.
I don't see where that extra £4k comes from?
It makes me think the N/A's have hit their minimum where as the turbos will still come down a little in the next 3 years.
It's the same story with the S1 and S2 K-series Elises vs. the 111R. Rover engined cars can be had for £10k whereas the cheapest 111R on AutoTrader is up for £14.5k. The 0-60 times of an S1 vs. a 111R are pretty much the same as an NA vs. a turbo. People will pay more for a faster car, obvious really.
Low mileage and the newest turbos are also worth considerably more than £12k.
Edited by -JK-, 25 May 2011 - 07:26 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users