
So, Took Her In For A Service
#61
Posted 19 September 2011 - 10:44 AM
#62
Posted 19 September 2011 - 10:54 AM


#63
Posted 19 September 2011 - 11:55 AM
'Seb.F', on 19 Sept 2011 - 10:44 AM, said:
Did it work before you went in?
Yes
Did it work after you came out?
No
Quite obvious what happened.
Not quite so simple. If they tightened the plug to manufacturer's settings and the head failed, it is not their fault. My understanding is that the head only fails when overtightened? OP may need to prove this.
#64
Posted 19 September 2011 - 12:05 PM
'Partridge', on 19 Sept 2011 - 11:55 AM, said:
'Seb.F', on 19 Sept 2011 - 10:44 AM, said:
Did it work before you went in?
Yes
Did it work after you came out?
No
Quite obvious what happened.
Not quite so simple. If they tightened the plug to manufacturer's settings and the head failed, it is not their fault. My understanding is that the head only fails when overtightened? OP may need to prove this.
car is booked into AmD tomorrow for a report. then i will have an independant report on whats wrong and what caused it, its going to cost me £30/60 (which noted is more or less the cost if i serviced the car myself)
armed with that information i can move forwards. 1 of 2 things will happen, they will say yes it was GSS fault and i can move forwards with that.. or they will say we just think it happened all by it self and i'll have to swallow the cost and repair it myself...

#65
Posted 19 September 2011 - 12:10 PM
#66
Posted 19 September 2011 - 12:16 PM
#67
Posted 19 September 2011 - 12:18 PM

Edited by Stuwy, 19 September 2011 - 12:21 PM.
#68
Posted 19 September 2011 - 12:30 PM
'Stuwy', on 19 Sept 2011 - 12:18 PM, said:
just found this
http://www.speedster.../tis/index.html
;Documentation section: Engine and Engine Aggregates (the last one on the list)
on page 8 it states the Nm to be 40 for spark plugs is this correct? and is there anyway of testing the streangth of how tight then are in atm?
thanks cliff, i'll bare that in mind
There are slightly specialer (yes thats a word) torque wrenches that have a bi-directional gauge on them to see how much torque is needed to undo things.... problem is friction etc will now play a huge part and make the undoing reading fairly high.
40NM sounds MASSIVELY over the top imho.
This is the very reason I'll do anything on a VX bar spark plugs

#69
Posted 19 September 2011 - 12:41 PM
'slindborg', on 19 Sept 2011 - 12:30 PM, said:
'Stuwy', on 19 Sept 2011 - 12:18 PM, said:
just found this
http://www.speedster.../tis/index.html
;Documentation section: Engine and Engine Aggregates (the last one on the list)
on page 8 it states the Nm to be 40 for spark plugs is this correct? and is there anyway of testing the streangth of how tight then are in atm?
thanks cliff, i'll bare that in mind
There are slightly specialer (yes thats a word) torque wrenches that have a bi-directional gauge on them to see how much torque is needed to undo things.... problem is friction etc will now play a huge part and make the undoing reading fairly high.
40NM sounds MASSIVELY over the top imho.
This is the very reason I'll do anything on a VX bar spark plugs
sorry i ment 20nm

#70
Posted 19 September 2011 - 05:24 PM
they wont budge, he said that cylinder 4 is week and its a design fault and even removing the old plugs could have caused the damage, its not their fault he said, it not your fault he said.. "we are not in the blame game"..
the torque wrench certificate will be in the post as will the data that they used to torque the sparks up.. and that means if its wrong it will be doctored..

Edited by Stuwy, 19 September 2011 - 05:24 PM.
#71
Posted 19 September 2011 - 05:28 PM
#72
Posted 19 September 2011 - 05:36 PM

#73
Posted 19 September 2011 - 05:58 PM
'Stuwy', on 19 Sept 2011 - 5:24 PM, said:
"even removing the old plugs could have caused the damage"
OK it could have, but they didn't notice it when they removed the plug.
They also didn't notice the damage after putting the plug in.
It's not clear cut what's happened but it's in their care and they're "professionals"
I reckon the best ending could be both parties paying half the repair costs?
It's not ideal but could be an alternative?
#74
Posted 19 September 2011 - 06:01 PM
'Stuwy', on 19 Sept 2011 - 5:36 PM, said:
"its an inherent problem with these cars and you just have to accept it"
![]()
p.s Joe the likely hood of me getting anything out of this garage is remote so it might come to that.. in the mean time i have no car. Christmas might be cancelled...
Small claims court?
Solicitors letter isn't expensive.
I find it hard to swallow that they, as a competent garage, can fit spark plugs and crack the head and then argue it's a design fault.
#75
Posted 19 September 2011 - 06:12 PM
Give them a clear time by which you want them to respond.
Get the engineer's report and a quote for reparation.
Send copies of all of this, requesting recompense.
If they won't play ball, there is a small claims process that you can follow.
This lot will guide you on following the correct process.
www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/contact
Go for it Stuwy. With any luck it won't come to this; most companies back down when they get the letter and see that you are serious.
#76
Posted 19 September 2011 - 06:16 PM
'Big Steve ', on 19 Sept 2011 - 6:12 PM, said:
This lot will guide you on following the correct process.
www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/contact
Go for it Stuwy. With any luck it won't come to this; most companies back down when they get the letter and see that you are serious.

If your car was ok before the work was done, THEY did the work, and now it's not ok, then it has to be down to whatever THEY did - whether they admit they are liable or not.
#77
Posted 19 September 2011 - 06:21 PM

#78
Posted 19 September 2011 - 07:33 PM
#79
Posted 19 September 2011 - 07:35 PM

Edited by vocky, 19 September 2011 - 07:35 PM.
#80
Posted 19 September 2011 - 07:37 PM

Edited by ArticMonkey, 19 September 2011 - 07:37 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users