Jump to content


Photo

Aerodynamics, Why Are They Important?


  • Please log in to reply
44 replies to this topic

#1 mbes2

mbes2

    Someone say Plasti Dip?

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,515 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Feering, Essex
  • Interests:"Keep it standard"
    "Yes, I built it"

Posted 01 December 2011 - 04:05 PM

Aerodynamics, Why are they important?


Aerodynamics is the study of gasses moving over and around a body in motion. This airflow also will affect the body’s movement through the flow. Aerodynamics is used on road vehicles in order to make them safer and maximise fuel efficiency. Aerodynamics is more commonly used in race car designs because of the higher speeds that the vehicles do. In race car design, the same principles of aerodynamics are applied, just with a slight twist. The shape of a race car chassis is remarkably similar to an inverted aircraft wing. When a wing is inverted it creates downforce (negative lift) instead of lift.


Road Car Modifications


Many modifications can be made to a production car in order to raise their aerodynamic efficiency. These modifications can range from being fairly in-expensive, to extremely expensive. The modifications that can be made are listed and explained below.


Spoiler


A spoiler is a device that slows and collects air causing it to stand still. The spoiler creates an area of high pressure replacing the normal low pressure over the rear of the car. This helps reduce the pressure difference between the top and bottom of the car in turn which in turn creates downforce and reduces lift. Spoilers have one major drawback, they increase drag.

Posted Image


Airdams


The easiest way to stop air stagnation under the vehicle is to block the air going there. This is done by means of an “Airdam.” An airdam is a spoiler placed at the front of the car at the bottom of the bumper. Airdams also collect air thus increasing drag although by stopping the drag created by the stagnation under the car, the airdam actually reduces the overall drag. It also creates a pressure difference between the top and the bottom of the front of the car creating downforce giving increased cornering grip and steering response.

Posted Image


Splitters


A splitter is very similar to an airdam in the way it works. Splitters are normally found on the bottom of the airdam. The splitter utilises the stagnant air caused by the airdam to create downforce.

Posted Image


Sideskirts


Side Skirts are needed on a car because the low pressure under the car won’t last long if air can just enter from the sides. Side skirts block airflow entering the underside of the car. The skirts are found between the front and rear wheels on each side of the vehicle.


Undertrays


Undertrays are a great way to reduce pressure under the vehicle and overall lift. Undertrays will not work alone. They must be used in conjunction with side skirts, airdams, and splitters.

Posted Image


Airfoils


Airfoils are the most common of devices for producing downforce. Airfoils (wings) use a pressure difference in order to create downforce similar to the way an aircraft wing works although instead of creating lift as an aircraft does, an airfoil creates negative lift.

Posted Image


Diffusers


Diffusers create the most downforce of all the modifications talked about. They create so much downforce that a lot of governing bodies for motorsports have banned them completely.
A diffuser is a device that expands the directions of the airflow thus increasing the pressure of the flow. The optimum angle for a diffuser is around 9.5° above horizontal. A diffuser located at the rear of a vehicle will also serve as a pressure reservoir to fill the void at the back of the car. Not only do diffusers create massive amounts of downforce but they can also significantly reduce drag.

Posted Image

Posted Image

#2 Nev

Nev

    Nipper's Minion

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,587 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bristol
  • Interests:Rock climbing, skiing, kayaking, surfing, mountaineering, budgies, chess, practical mechanics.

Posted 01 December 2011 - 05:28 PM

Where did you dig this up from Mark?

The statement "Diffusers create the most downforce of all the modifications talked about" is highly suspect. I think most people would agree it is less effective than a wing/splitter.

#3 mbes2

mbes2

    Someone say Plasti Dip?

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,515 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Feering, Essex
  • Interests:"Keep it standard"
    "Yes, I built it"

Posted 01 December 2011 - 05:56 PM

just found it via google... while having a read up on some other bits... thought it looked good, for a better understanding.. now on to "DIY wind tunnel" kit from ebay.... lol

#4 Noodle1791

Noodle1791

    Super Duper Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 520 posts

Posted 01 December 2011 - 06:14 PM

Good reading! I wonder if anyone told the Elise driver he had 5 car ramps behind him before he backed up! My god they were huge!!!

#5 2.2_na

2.2_na

    No Compromise

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,323 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 02 December 2011 - 02:37 AM

'mbes2', on 01 Dec 2011 - 5:56 PM, said:

now on to "DIY wind tunnel" kit from ebay.... lol


I hope you video that. :lol:

#6 Nev

Nev

    Nipper's Minion

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,587 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bristol
  • Interests:Rock climbing, skiing, kayaking, surfing, mountaineering, budgies, chess, practical mechanics.

Posted 02 December 2011 - 05:10 PM

Anyone can write some vague unsubstanciated disinformation on the internet like that.

#7 oblomov

oblomov

    oblomov

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,853 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:A colder windier place than stevieturbo's.
  • Interests:Mumblers

Posted 02 December 2011 - 05:29 PM

'Nev', on 02 Dec 2011 - 5:10 PM, said:

Anyone can write some vague unsubstanciated disinformation on the internet like that.

And very poorly written as well.

#8 MrSimba

MrSimba

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,197 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 02 December 2011 - 08:14 PM

Posted Image

Subtle... very subtle! :blink:

Bet Joe will be getting the ally sheet and a riviter out this weekend after seeing this this tho!!! :D

Edited by MrSimba, 02 December 2011 - 08:18 PM.


#9 techieboy

techieboy

    Supercharger of Doom

  • 22,914 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bedford

Posted 02 December 2011 - 08:15 PM

Sector111

#10 FLD

FLD

    WANNABE MY LOVER

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,717 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near nantwich
  • Interests:Tugging my todger.

Posted 02 December 2011 - 10:30 PM

....and then he'll dremel the hell out of it :D

#11 Cookies220

Cookies220

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,721 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beds.

Posted 03 December 2011 - 09:09 AM

I must admit I was surprised to read a diffuser is more effective than a wing! Personally, I don't believe that.

#12 techieboy

techieboy

    Supercharger of Doom

  • 22,914 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bedford

Posted 03 December 2011 - 09:20 AM

Ferrari's seem to get away with fancy diffusers and clever management of the air on the underside of their "road" cars, without resorting to stupid big wings or any wings at all in a lot of cases. No great big wings on 3' high pylons on a 458 or F430 Scuderia's. So don't dismiss it entirely. But, that's a result of designing it in properly, from the start. Most of the aftermarket blingstuff we bolt on willy nilly has either no effect, or very little effect.

#13 Vespa

Vespa

    Super Duper Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 685 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Newbury
  • Interests:Cars
    Girls
    Food

Posted 03 December 2011 - 07:15 PM

Diffusers are extremely powerful aero devises and are the most efficient thing you can have on your race car because it operates directly over ground, unlike a rear wing for example which does not see the ground underneath it. downforce gained through the diffuser often comes with little or zero drag which is why its preferable to find your perfromance here. the rear wings on f1 cars for example are filthy, and if the fia ever allowed ground effect to be used again you would certainly see a reduction in the size of wings used. Just to give you n idea, with ground effect the f1 cars of the time saw efficiencies of circa 13:1. now the teams are lucky if they see 3.5:1. wings and other bolt on aero devises could never hope to ahcieve this :(

#14 P11 COV

P11 COV

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,683 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:MK
  • Interests:Cars, Music, God, Family. Holidays.

Posted 03 December 2011 - 10:03 PM

'Nev', on 02 Dec 2011 - 5:10 PM, said:

Anyone can write some vague unsubstanciated disinformation on the internet like that.


And there's loads of unsubstantiated bollocks talked on here too. So I don't really see the difference between this and some of the 'know it all' experts that post regularly on this site with no proof of their so called expertise.

Edited by P11 COV, 03 December 2011 - 10:04 PM.


#15 luke.

luke.

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,167 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:west mids

Posted 04 December 2011 - 01:22 AM

Bring back ground effect F1!!! To go back with these turbos :lol:

#16 Winstar

Winstar

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,264 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield

Posted 04 December 2011 - 12:23 PM

'P11 COV', on 03 Dec 2011 - 10:03 PM, said:

'Nev', on 02 Dec 2011 - 5:10 PM, said:


Anyone can write some vague unsubstanciated disinformation on the internet like that.


And there's loads of unsubstantiated bollocks talked on here too. So I don't really see the difference between this and some of the 'know it all' experts that post regularly on this site with no proof of their so called expertise.


:yeahthat:
There are subjects I've now just given up responding to or correcting as I'm sick of 'internet exspurts' regurgitating sh1t they've read/heard/been told by someone trying to sell them somthing with little real knowlage or understanding of it.

#17 RobNA

RobNA

    RobSC :)

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,856 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St Albans

Posted 04 December 2011 - 12:50 PM

'Winstar', on 04 Dec 2011 - 12:23 PM, said:

'P11 COV', on 03 Dec 2011 - 10:03 PM, said:


'Nev', on 02 Dec 2011 - 5:10 PM, said:


Anyone can write some vague unsubstanciated disinformation on the internet like that.


And there's loads of unsubstantiated bollocks talked on here too. So I don't really see the difference between this and some of the 'know it all' experts that post regularly on this site with no proof of their so called expertise.


:yeahthat:
There are subjects I've now just given up responding to or correcting as I'm sick of 'internet exspurts' regurgitating sh1t they've read/heard/been told by someone trying to sell them somthing with little real knowlage or understanding of it.


:yeahthat:

#18 Tail slide

Tail slide

    Member

  • Pip
  • 241 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Shropshire
  • Interests:Fast road cars, trackdays & sprints, snowboarding.

Posted 04 December 2011 - 01:31 PM

If you're fed up with the bull and can handle some techy stuff, with many cfd pics, thorough explanations, calcs and photos from all types of motorsport....

Posted Image

Simon McBeath's main job is developing cfd analysis & building all types of aero devices for a wide variety of racecars, measured at MIRA windtunnel and then seen through to success on track, especially single seaters at speed hillclimbs which is where I know him from.

Some things were obvious, but many more were surprising, especially the complex choices of maintaining aero balance vs. maximising flow/drag vs. reducing lift, plus all the interplay between components like diffusers & rear wings.

Fascinating stuff and quite readable, unless you've had a beer or two....

#19 Boombang

Boombang

    Saxo boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,022 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brentwood, Essex

Posted 04 December 2011 - 02:26 PM

'RobNA', on 04 Dec 2011 - 12:50 PM, said:

'Winstar', on 04 Dec 2011 - 12:23 PM, said:


'P11 COV', on 03 Dec 2011 - 10:03 PM, said:


'Nev', on 02 Dec 2011 - 5:10 PM, said:


Anyone can write some vague unsubstanciated disinformation on the internet like that.


And there's loads of unsubstantiated bollocks talked on here too. So I don't really see the difference between this and some of the 'know it all' experts that post regularly on this site with no proof of their so called expertise.


:yeahthat:
There are subjects I've now just given up responding to or correcting as I'm sick of 'internet exspurts' regurgitating sh1t they've read/heard/been told by someone trying to sell them somthing with little real knowlage or understanding of it.


:yeahthat:



Perhaps the one and only time I want the 'Like This' button to work on this forum.

There are a couple of experts on here who's posts I can't actually read for cringing.

#20 Aerodynamic

Aerodynamic

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,455 posts

Posted 31 October 2014 - 05:08 PM

Have anyone done any measurement on a VX and looked for gained downforce with different aero mods? BR, Per




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users