As is everybody else... DOH! of course.
Cliffie Double Time Attack 2012+13 Champion!
#3741
Posted 13 May 2013 - 08:18 AM
#3742
Posted 13 May 2013 - 08:23 AM
I would be concerned that by going even lower the gt uprights don't make the rear driveshaft angles any better.
Thats a good point, maybe the next mod part on the scene will be offset (ie lowered) front+rear engine mounts and shorter side turret mounts so the whole engine can be lowered a few CM.
Good for CoG, but that is making the angles even worse!
Ideally you should rotate the engine forward so the gearbox shaftcenter goes upward.
#3743
Posted 13 May 2013 - 08:24 AM
I would be concerned that by going even lower the gt uprights don't make the rear driveshaft angles any better.
true, but think about it for a minute, what defines the shaft angles?
also, consider the effect of rear camber on the joints too...
#3744
Posted 13 May 2013 - 08:29 AM
Simon, it was just a throwaway comment, I don't have a technical drawing of your parts so don't take it as a criticism.
#3745
Posted 13 May 2013 - 08:32 AM
Simon, it was just a throwaway comment, I don't have a technical drawing of your parts so don't take it as a criticism.
not taking it as such, just trying to get you to think it though..
irrespective of the upright, shaft angle is related to wheel height vs. gearbox height vs. ride hight
#3746
Posted 13 May 2013 - 08:33 AM
Morning Simon.
#3747
Posted 13 May 2013 - 08:34 AM
Morning Simon.
answer your phone!
#3748
Posted 13 May 2013 - 08:42 AM
#3749
Posted 13 May 2013 - 09:40 AM
#3750
Posted 13 May 2013 - 09:42 AM
Mike I've been really impressed with your progress this year. With the well publicised updates to your car there must have been some real pressure to deliver and some would have choked but you've obviously taken it in your stride, well done mate and keep up the great work.
Thanks Dave, hope to catch up with you this year, it has been too long.
#3751
Posted 13 May 2013 - 09:45 AM
Mike I've been really impressed with your progress this year. With the well publicised updates to your car there must have been some real pressure to deliver and some would have choked but you've obviously taken it in your stride, well done mate and keep up the great work.
Thanks Dave, hope to catch up with you this year, it has been too long.
Too true
#3752
Posted 13 May 2013 - 10:08 AM
Morning Simon.
answer your phone!
Back atchya...
#3753
Posted 13 May 2013 - 11:19 AM
Well done Mike looking Very nice, wow that car is set up
#3754
Posted 13 May 2013 - 11:55 AM
irrespective of the upright, shaft angle is related to wheel height vs. gearbox height vs. ride hight
With a very low car to get/keep straight axles I suppose you'd either need to run small (eg. 10-13") wheels with low-profile tyres (gearing may get a bit bizarre and brakes that fit under them get tiny ) or get a gearbox/transaxle with a diff mounted with a (much) higher center-line I guess...
Unless you'd start raising the engine itself in the chassis, but that's not nice for the COG.. If space is available then tilting the engine, and effectively raising the bottom end+gearbox could be somewhat of a compromise. But that probably plays havoc with the oiling (drain path from head and sump pickup) making it rather un-attractive....
Bye, Arno.
#3755
Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:48 PM
#3756
Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:49 PM
Mike learn how to use the new quote function lol
How do I use the new quote function and when did it change?
#3757
Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:49 PM
#3758
Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:52 PM
#3759
Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:58 PM
It's crap Mike. It's not your fault. The design of the update is flawed.
I realise it aint my fault but still no idea how to make it work.
#3760
Posted 13 May 2013 - 01:05 PM
Press the little switch button at top left of box when typing. It will give you the plain text look and sort out the quotes.I realise it aint my fault but still no idea how to make it work.It's crap Mike. It's not your fault. The design of the update is flawed.
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users