What has changed
The nasty Tories are in charge now.....
Posted 14 September 2014 - 04:31 PM
What has changed
The nasty Tories are in charge now.....
Posted 14 September 2014 - 04:37 PM
But they had their chance in 1978 and they said NO then Why be allowed another What has changed
Actually the majority said yes didn't they in 1978?
Just that there wasn't enough of them out there saying either yes or no...
I have to admit I'm sick of the commentary on all this now, from the political side and the general public. I can't wait for it to be over, whichever way it goes.
G
Posted 14 September 2014 - 07:31 PM
Posted 14 September 2014 - 07:45 PM
Were you alive?Yep we said yes in 1979....
Posted 14 September 2014 - 07:51 PM
Posted 14 September 2014 - 07:54 PM
Yeah, don't really remember the vote though.Nope. Were you?
Posted 14 September 2014 - 08:04 PM
One thing is certain; Scott is going to have quite a lot of spare time when it's over
Posted 14 September 2014 - 08:25 PM
Posted 14 September 2014 - 08:35 PM
Have fun on the cruise.
Posted 14 September 2014 - 08:50 PM
Couldn't agree more. But, the next general election will be interesting if it's a yes voteI have to admit I'm sick of the commentary on all this now G
Posted 14 September 2014 - 09:29 PM
Posted 15 September 2014 - 08:05 AM
It will be chaotic. There's chat of postponing it until 2016 which might make more sense. Not sure what polls you mean Mark. Most of the polling I've seen has No just ahead. Yes has been ahead in only 2(??). There's no practice polls as such they are surveys conducted by polling companies to guage opinion. The same companies that do this during elections. Who knows what will happen, the campaign has changed over the past couple of weeks, really picked up pace and it's properly visible all over. Thousands of people out on the streets. Interesting times. It's going to be very close. #voteyesCouldn't agree more. But, the next general election will be interesting if it's a yes voteI have to admit I'm sick of the commentary on all this now G
Posted 15 September 2014 - 09:52 AM
They won't post-pone a general election for this. To do so would be quite undemocratic, and give the current government more time than they should have in power. The supposed negotiations that will take place will just have to wait until after the GE has concluded, meaning this time next year realistically. Which gives Team Salmond about 6-7 months to sucessfully negotiate possibly one of the most complex set of negotiations that two countries have ever had to do, in order to meet their politically motivated 'independance day'...
Just as with the currency union issue, some nationalists think they hold some sort of power over the other +60 million people not in Scotland. Oh how mistaken they will be...
Posted 15 September 2014 - 09:58 AM
Posted 15 September 2014 - 10:25 AM
The negotiations, whilst important to conclude in a relatively quick fashion to limit damage to both countries, will ultimately fall secondary to the political requirements of the UK.
Might just be that we are excluded from voting next year in the UK general election, and the commons becomes smaller to suit, until a more fomalised approach is put in place. That (to me) seems the most sensible approach to avoid the situation.
Besides, I thought we never had this effect on UK general elections, hence we never get the government we vote for?
Posted 15 September 2014 - 10:28 AM
Posted 15 September 2014 - 10:30 AM
Posted 15 September 2014 - 10:36 AM
Its secondary for us, currently, yes...
Ah, the Mirror... MSM scare story maybe? Perhaps you missed the NHS Scotland and devolution part...
Posted 15 September 2014 - 10:40 AM
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users