
so, what's the best engine I can source to drop in. Specifically i'm wondering what modifications I need to make to a B207 engine to make it think it's a Z22se
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:00 PM
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:04 PM
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:17 PM
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:18 PM
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:30 PM
'jules_s', on 13 Apr 2012 - 9:17 PM, said:
So for future reference for a numpty like me (and i've not seen any other posts by the OP)
What's the issue there....apart from the seemingly obvious?
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:33 PM
'techieboy', on 13 Apr 2012 - 9:18 PM, said:
Best engine to "drop" in would be another Z22SE.
B207 will need the 7-1 crank from a Z22SE (for the trigger wheel pattern and the bolt pattern for the Z22SE flywheel), some accessory holes on the head blanking off, Z22YH(?) coil pack for the different style of spark plug, oil cooler return changing. May be a question mark over the Saab cams in an NA setup. The Aero cams, though from a boosted car, didn't work with my Z22SE head, though that may have been down to timing differences between the engines.
Think I've still got a couple of pairs of NA cams in the garage, if they're of any use?
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:37 PM
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:38 PM
'fezzasus', on 13 Apr 2012 - 9:33 PM, said:
The cams could be useful though, i'll have to investigate tappet cost to see if it's an option for me, i'd prefer to change them while i'm at it.
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:40 PM
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:42 PM
'techieboy', on 13 Apr 2012 - 9:38 PM, said:
'fezzasus', on 13 Apr 2012 - 9:33 PM, said:
The cams could be useful though, i'll have to investigate tappet cost to see if it's an option for me, i'd prefer to change them while i'm at it.
Think I may still have a set of those as well left over from the last rebuild.
What are the rockers like? It's not got "uprated" springs in it, has it?
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:45 PM
'joe_589', on 13 Apr 2012 - 9:40 PM, said:
i dont think they are that bad
is there actually a fault?
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:46 PM
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:47 PM
'alanoo', on 13 Apr 2012 - 9:46 PM, said:
What kind of mileage ?
It's cam wear yes, roller followers to not completely remove cam wear unfortunately, but if we're speaking of a 100k+ engine, looks perfectly normal to me...
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:53 PM
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:54 PM
'joe_589', on 13 Apr 2012 - 9:40 PM, said:
i dont think they are that bad
is there actually a fault?
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:59 PM
Posted 13 April 2012 - 10:00 PM
'jules_s', on 13 Apr 2012 - 9:54 PM, said:
'joe_589', on 13 Apr 2012 - 9:40 PM, said:
i dont think they are that badis there actually a fault?
Knowing jack squat about failures i thought the same.
I sort of thought the narrowing of the cam was the issue; not some scoring on something that goes up/down circa 100 times a second
Why would that shag the whole engine anyways?
Meh, I'll learn about engines one day
You're right, narrowing of the cam (this can usually been seen comparing the side taper to the taper on the side of the cam tip, they are the same when new, but cam tip wears flat so no taper - this results in a loss of power, but no real engine issues.
The pitting is a mode of failure though - the material that's removed from the cam or tappet circulate around the engine as a 3rd body abrasive, causing liner scoring, further cam/tappet wear, blocking oil channels or the oil pickup, increasing filter pressure. wear metals also act as deposit seeding points which causes piston deposits.
Posted 13 April 2012 - 10:01 PM
'joe_589', on 13 Apr 2012 - 9:59 PM, said:
I defiantly wouldn't change an engine because of that!
I reckon he is looking for an excuse to dump a b207 in
Although be warned its not straight forward
Posted 14 April 2012 - 05:38 AM
Posted 14 April 2012 - 05:56 AM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users