
Oh My God!
#21
Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:36 PM
#22
Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:43 PM
#23
Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:48 PM

#24
Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:50 PM
#25
Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:56 PM
#26
Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:57 PM
thats much more down to the driver
Yeah true, will still add to the debate though.
Edited by J4EY D, 05 June 2012 - 02:57 PM.
#27
Posted 05 June 2012 - 03:02 PM
a stage four breezes past a harrop
It will at the moment because the Harrop is sat on the drive waiting to be finished
#28
Posted 05 June 2012 - 03:05 PM
#29
Posted 05 June 2012 - 06:17 PM
#30
Posted 05 June 2012 - 06:26 PM
#31
Posted 05 June 2012 - 06:42 PM
my na at abbeville against a couple of stage 4's.
exactly...
down to the driver and the track.
So the stage 4s won, then?
#32
Posted 05 June 2012 - 06:49 PM
#33
Posted 05 June 2012 - 06:59 PM
Dont you mean 262lbft so only 100lbft plus the extra weight of the tubby.
Would a stage 4 tubby be as quick as a stage 3 supercharged or about the same. Since having my stage 3 ive got use to it and it don't feel as quick now. so wondering if its because its a turbo its feels more brutal then a sc one.
Put it this way 300bhp supercharged 200lbft?
300bhp turbo 360lbft ......... +160lbft
Hmmmmm whats going to be quicker, let me think..... hmmmmmm
Chrisuk did a few 0-60 times of a 300bhp sc vx and was under 4 seconds, so would like to see a tubby achieve that.
Edited by haggi961, 05 June 2012 - 07:11 PM.
#34
Posted 05 June 2012 - 07:04 PM
Supercharger...thats the thing off a 1930 Bentley isnt it?
Just shows you that quality stuff of a sc has been around for years.
#35
Posted 05 June 2012 - 07:07 PM
#36
Posted 05 June 2012 - 07:10 PM

#37
Posted 05 June 2012 - 07:13 PM
#38
Posted 05 June 2012 - 07:14 PM
#39
Posted 05 June 2012 - 07:29 PM
#40
Posted 05 June 2012 - 07:49 PM
223.8 whp and 344nm from 2800 rpm

I no it wasn't safe for his engine but just shows you what the vx sc can do.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users