Jump to content


Photo

Dutch Z22Se Ecu Software Now Available.

obdtuner remap z22se ecu

  • Please log in to reply
2116 replies to this topic

#61 alexb

alexb

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 367 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the Netherlands

Posted 18 January 2013 - 01:58 PM

Just so that everybody understands. Once you have OBD Tuner and the base map, you can do (and are supposed to do) a learning session which means you put the ECU in learn mode and try to hit as much cells in a table of RPM vs manifold pressure (SC) as possible. All by driving around at different rpm, accelarating etc. Takes about 45 minutes to an hour to hit most cells. Inter- and extrapolation and smoothening takes care of cells that you missed or that do not have enough measurement points. The result is a map that improves on the base map and should reflect whatever you have done to the engine. It may sound elaborate, but in practice it's not difficult to do. The only thing that hurts is driving at max rpm in first or second gear without shifting. It's just not natural.

#62 siztenboots

siztenboots

    RaceMode

  • 26,611 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Surrey
  • Interests:french maids

Posted 18 January 2013 - 02:02 PM

Here is the original file 2.2 16V 147hp Z22SE petrol/gasoline engine Delco GMPT E15 link - https://dl.dropbox.c...Sw 12210633.ORI

#63 techieboy

techieboy

    Supercharger of Doom

  • 22,914 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bedford

Posted 18 January 2013 - 02:03 PM

(I still keep my LSJ ecu, as for a B207/LSJ engine with 58-2 crank trigger (YH) and Saab head that is plug & play with the direct coil ignition. The LSJ/HPT program is very flexible with combined MAF + MAP/rpm mapping and more parameters with a very powerfull HPT scanner tool.)
Edit; and it's cheaper... :happy:


Still the route for me. Though I'm kind of already financially well committed to going down that route for the physical engine benefits, whatever.

If I were keeping the Z22SE as is, I'd have had this done the soon as it was compatible with the SC conversions (even if that meant driving to Holland), just to sort out the stupid overfuelling that we have to endure.

#64 VIX

VIX

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,497 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milton Keynes

Posted 18 January 2013 - 02:03 PM

Just so that everybody understands. Once you have OBD Tuner and the base map, you can do (and are supposed to do) a learning session which means you put the ECU in learn mode and try to hit as much cells in a table of RPM vs manifold pressure (SC) as possible. All by driving around at different rpm, accelarating etc. Takes about 45 minutes to an hour to hit most cells. Inter- and extrapolation and smoothening takes care of cells that you missed or that do not have enough measurement points. The result is a map that improves on the base map and should reflect whatever you have done to the engine. It may sound elaborate, but in practice it's not difficult to do. The only thing that hurts is driving at max rpm in first or second gear without shifting. It's just not natural.



I'd have thought a well planned hour or so round Bruntingthorpe or similar could tick the boxes and the map could be offered to others. :unsure:

Edited by VIX, 18 January 2013 - 02:03 PM.


#65 techieboy

techieboy

    Supercharger of Doom

  • 22,914 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bedford

Posted 18 January 2013 - 02:07 PM

I'd have thought a well planned hour or so round Bruntingthorpe or similar could tick the boxes and the map could be offered to others. :unsure:


Maybe a decent starting point but why wouldn't you just do the same learning process yourself and know that it was spot on for your own individual car and setup?

#66 oakmere

oakmere

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,143 posts

Posted 18 January 2013 - 02:09 PM

Same as cs, just no more overfuel and hickups.
Only buy this for control, not performance.


This is why I went for this option. I had spent a lot of time and effort rebuilding the engine so wanted the mapping to be correct for all driving conditions not just flat out and also to upgrade the TB and injectors.

Mapping the upper rpm in learn mode did make me cringe.

#67 NickB787

NickB787

    Gone but not forgotten

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,813 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bedford

Posted 18 January 2013 - 02:10 PM


Mapping the upper rpm in learn mode did make me cringe.


:lol:

#68 Baron Von Scubadaddy

Baron Von Scubadaddy

    STAGE 3.333333333333333333333333333333

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,644 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North London
  • Interests:Girls, Cars,..... ! spending time asking questions about why my car won't work

Posted 18 January 2013 - 02:21 PM

would it be worth doing this at a rolling road Could you then build different maps on the rolling road?

Edited by Baron Von Scubadaddy, 18 January 2013 - 02:22 PM.


#69 Exmantaa

Exmantaa

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,982 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 18 January 2013 - 02:38 PM


Same as cs, just no more overfuel and hickups.
Only buy this for control, not performance.


This is why I went for this option. I had spent a lot of time and effort rebuilding the engine so wanted the mapping to be correct for all driving conditions not just flat out and also to upgrade the TB and injectors.

Mapping the upper rpm in learn mode did make me cringe.


And in addition to that; learning mode in OBD tuner is done in full Closed Loop mode with the narrowband sensor, so around 14.7AFR...
Take care with boosted engines that you only do short WOT runs and let it cool in between!
On higlly boosted engines I would stick with a safer Open Loop fuel enrichment logging with safer Wideband feedback ~11.8AFR. (Think Peter now made a signal logging possible through the redundant EGR wiring.)

And with the LSJ/HPTuners I went through the same process of logging 7000+rpm ranges in the lower gears. Or high load 5th gear bogging down with handbrake on. Fun. :happy:

#70 slindborg

slindborg

    The Bishop of Stortford

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,602 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:.

Posted 18 January 2013 - 02:39 PM

Alright, I want a VX again :lol:

#71 techieboy

techieboy

    Supercharger of Doom

  • 22,914 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bedford

Posted 18 January 2013 - 03:06 PM

:lol:

#72 JG

JG

    Newbie

  • 13,612 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Berks

Posted 18 January 2013 - 03:16 PM

I don't mind buying one, but i fear there is a whole lot of learning (for me) to do.

#73 JohnTurbo

JohnTurbo

    SuperScruff

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,635 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:wigan
  • Interests:Performance cars!

Posted 18 January 2013 - 03:20 PM

I need to do something soon for my SC conversion. I hate running too rich- but £750 is a lot of cash.

#74 Bargi

Bargi

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,483 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 18 January 2013 - 03:26 PM

I need to do something soon for my SC conversion.

I hate running too rich- but £750 is a lot of cash.


I think it's a bargain for what it gives you, You'll spend at least half that doing it the CS way.
£250 for base map/license
£90/hr RR
£XX fuel to get there
~£50 B&B for the night
£XX hours of your time to go up there on a workday
ability to adjust fueling whenever you make change and the geek factor of doing your own mapping... priceless :D

Like you ff you haven't already paid the £250 for the basemap it's more compelling

#75 LY_Scott

LY_Scott

    Formerly LY055SCO

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,221 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Burntisland, Fife
  • Interests:Stock Car Racing. Sailing, Good Food and Drink! Celtic, Scottish National Team. Bands

Posted 18 January 2013 - 03:28 PM

I don't mind buying one, but i fear there is a whole lot of learning (for me) to do.


Visit Stu with it :lol:

#76 JohnTurbo

JohnTurbo

    SuperScruff

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,635 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:wigan
  • Interests:Performance cars!

Posted 18 January 2013 - 03:31 PM

Drive away solution has its own appeal. Even at £650 I'd possibly go for it, but I cant stomach spending that amount on software, no matter how awesome it is.

#77 techieboy

techieboy

    Supercharger of Doom

  • 22,914 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bedford

Posted 18 January 2013 - 03:32 PM

I think it's a bargain for what it gives you,

But, only if it works as well as we all hope and if it actually improves anything.

#78 FLD

FLD

    WANNABE MY LOVER

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,717 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near nantwich
  • Interests:Tugging my todger.

Posted 18 January 2013 - 03:33 PM

Drive away solution has its own appeal.

Even at £650 I'd possibly go for it, but I cant stomach spending that amount on software, no matter how awesome it is.


How long before someone figures out how to copy it. Slindymaps coming soon?

#79 techieboy

techieboy

    Supercharger of Doom

  • 22,914 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bedford

Posted 18 January 2013 - 03:35 PM


Drive away solution has its own appeal.

Even at £650 I'd possibly go for it, but I cant stomach spending that amount on software, no matter how awesome it is.


How long before someone figures out how to copy it. Slindymaps coming soon?


He spent 3 years working out how to encrypt and protect it and a year working out how to make it work. :P

#80 Exmantaa

Exmantaa

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,982 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 18 January 2013 - 03:38 PM

Given the expertise Peter has with this, he for sure made some strong protection in it.
But then again, nothing that can't be hacked...





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: obdtuner, remap, z22se, ecu

5 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users