Dies a bit early, not?
Project Chill 1
#2541
Posted 06 March 2016 - 09:12 PM
#2542
Posted 06 March 2016 - 09:27 PM
This was my 2.0 B207/LSJ Harrop on the Maha rollers last year with the 80mm pulley and 2.5 exhaust system.
I was also a bit rich till 6000rpm and not sure on the max torque figures, but you clearly see the different torque shape of you 2.2 volume engine:
#2543
Posted 06 March 2016 - 09:28 PM
Thats 339hp at the fly,correct? Should be more I guess when looking at your fuelsetup. 630cc@1.4~ish bar of boost (correct?) =~768cc flow. 768cc@85% DC should be in the 380bhp (330ish whp) range according calculations (http://www.witchhunt...jectorcalc1.php ).
A calculaton is just what it is, but when running almost full puff on 630's then 339hp seems a bit low
Interested what the logs say.
Edited by TFD, 06 March 2016 - 09:31 PM.
#2544
Posted 06 March 2016 - 09:30 PM
Don't forget the power needed to turn that big Harrop SC...
#2546
Posted 06 March 2016 - 09:35 PM
Don't forget the power needed to turn that big Harrop SC...
how much is that
#2547
Posted 06 March 2016 - 09:38 PM
Thats 339hp at the fly,correct? Should be more I guess when looking at your fuelsetup. 630cc@1.4~ish bar of boost (correct?) =~768cc flow. 768cc@85% DC should be in the 380bhp (330ish whp) range according calculations (http://www.witchhunt...jectorcalc1.php ).
A calculaton is just what it is, but when running almost full puff on 630's then 339hp seems a bit low
Interested what the logs say.
Anything particular you want me to check and share
#2548
Posted 06 March 2016 - 09:45 PM
Thats 339hp at the fly,correct? Should be more I guess when looking at your fuelsetup. 630cc@1.4~ish bar of boost (correct?) =~768cc flow. 768cc@85% DC should be in the 380bhp (330ish whp) range according calculations (http://www.witchhunt...jectorcalc1.php ).
A calculaton is just what it is, but when running almost full puff on 630's then 339hp seems a bit low
Interested what the logs say.
16 psi / 1.1 bar
and only 80% duty cycle today
Edited by CHILL Gone DUTCH, 06 March 2016 - 09:49 PM.
#2549
Posted 06 March 2016 - 10:59 PM
1. Vimes 318.1bhp (wheels)
2. Chill 340BHP wheels
3. Smiley 326 bhp wheels
4. Batman 331bhp
5. Haggie 364.7 bhp
6.TFD 330 whp
7. Oakmere 338.7 bhp
8. Lee2.2 327.8 bhp
looks like the Captain was closest
and haggie was miles out
lol
Edited by CHILL Gone DUTCH, 06 March 2016 - 11:04 PM.
#2550
Posted 06 March 2016 - 11:45 PM
Thats 339hp at the fly,correct? Should be more I guess when looking at your fuelsetup. 630cc@1.4~ish bar of boost (correct?) =~768cc flow. 768cc@85% DC should be in the 380bhp (330ish whp) range according calculations (http://www.witchhunt...jectorcalc1.php ).
A calculaton is just what it is, but when running almost full puff on 630's then 339hp seems a bit low
Interested what the logs say.
16 psi / 1.1 bar
and only 80% duty cycle today
That 1.1 bar is a "mild" boost pressure for the Harrop and you could do with a bit smaller pulley? But then low SC boost is good for your IAT on track.
(There are on-line calculators that estimate HP from the injector duty cycle. This one f.i.=> http://www.witchhunt...ectorcalc1.php)
#2551
Posted 07 March 2016 - 12:00 AM
1. Vimes 318.1bhp (wheels) 2. Chill 340BHP wheels 3. Smiley 326 bhp wheels 4. Batman 331bhp 5. Haggie 364.7 bhp 6.TFD 330 whp 7. Oakmere 338.7 bhp 8. Lee2.2 327.8 bhp
looks like the Captain was closest
and haggie was miles out
lol
A hollow victory - lower result than we all expected.
Taking a step back, you have power comparable to the Exige S and Lotus needed a 3.5 v6 and a supercharger to get the same power. Overall a pretty impressive power/torque graph.
#2552
Posted 07 March 2016 - 12:09 AM
#2553
Posted 07 March 2016 - 07:53 AM
That is a very good pointA hollow victory - lower result than we all expected. Taking a step back, you have power comparable to the Exige S and Lotus needed a 3.5 v6 and a supercharger to get the same power. Overall a pretty impressive power/torque graph.
looks like the Captain was closest and haggie was miles out lol1. Vimes 318.1bhp (wheels) 2. Chill 340BHP wheels 3. Smiley 326 bhp wheels 4. Batman 331bhp 5. Haggie 364.7 bhp 6.TFD 330 whp 7. Oakmere 338.7 bhp 8. Lee2.2 327.8 bhp
#2554
Posted 07 March 2016 - 08:08 AM
#2556
Posted 07 March 2016 - 11:19 AM
well how accurate is the dutch software reading #
#2557
Posted 07 March 2016 - 11:19 AM
ive now just got to find the lost horses
#2558
Posted 07 March 2016 - 11:32 AM
That is pretty good!
As we've seen more here. power numbers match but often the max torque values differ quite a bit
(299lb.ft = ~405Nm)
Can you show up a MAP log to check if you maybe had belt slip?
#2559
Posted 07 March 2016 - 11:39 AM
Your previous peak was 382 in cold weather right? (which was extremely high for a 3.1/80mm pully)
That's a lot to loose without any changes.
WTF?
Edited by smiley, 07 March 2016 - 11:40 AM.
#2560
Posted 07 March 2016 - 12:02 PM
im not sure whats been happening to be honest but im now on it
i had i miisfire this morning which was strange, which seemed to clear its self up after changing my transient setting back to what they were before i changed them at the beginning of the month
im actually going to go out and do a full fuel learn and take it from there
if this is whayt he power is then so be it, has peter changed the callabration in the new software ??
as it could be this
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users