Cheers Martin Are you going to peaks meet on 7 thExcellent work there chill the graph looks really good now. Might have to do a fuel learn on mine as I have only done it once!
Project Chill 1
#481
Posted 30 June 2013 - 08:01 AM
#482
Posted 30 June 2013 - 08:03 AM
#483
Posted 30 June 2013 - 09:11 AM
I put a Tullett 2.5" with their full system Big gain .I did have to put the uprated fuel pump on, as it ran quite lean at the top end.
#484
Posted 30 June 2013 - 09:14 AM
#485
Posted 30 June 2013 - 09:17 AM
I've uprated fuel pump to 255 Walbro And I have Tullett 2.5" back box just need manifold but on the other hand I don't want to go over 260bhp because of engine internals are standard and will be staying that way
My 2.2 NA engine is standard just make it a lot freer with the Tullett manifold
#486
Posted 30 June 2013 - 10:02 AM
Unfortunately not we have guests next weekend.Cheers Martin Are you going to peaks meet on 7 thExcellent work there chill the graph looks really good now. Might have to do a fuel learn on mine as I have only done it once!
#487
Posted 30 June 2013 - 10:06 AM
Ok we will have to get you out and about soon,Unfortunately not we have guests next weekend.Cheers Martin Are you going to peaks meet on 7 thExcellent work there chill the graph looks really good now. Might have to do a fuel learn on mine as I have only done it once!
#488
Posted 30 June 2013 - 11:58 AM
Wow, 320 ft/lb of torque - am I reading that graph right? That's a lot more than I would have guessed, how much torque does an OEM mapped ECU make for a stage 2 for comparison please? Seems like the power figure is low though, even accounting for power drain due to winding up the supercharger. Surely at 7000 RPM you'd expect something in the region of 7000/5252 * torque ?
Edited by Nev, 30 June 2013 - 12:02 PM.
#489
Posted 30 June 2013 - 12:00 PM
Come on Nev, look again. It's a supercharged car for Christ sake.Wow, 320 ft/lb of torque - am I reading that graph right? A lot more than I would have guessed, how much torque does an OEM mapped ECU make for a stage 2 for comparison please?
#490
Posted 30 June 2013 - 12:02 PM
Come on Nev, look again. It's a supercharged car for Christ sake.Wow, 320 ft/lb of torque - am I reading that graph right? A lot more than I would have guessed, how much torque does an OEM mapped ECU make for a stage 2 for comparison please?
I don't understand, what have I missed (hence the question) ?
#491
Posted 30 June 2013 - 12:06 PM
#492
Posted 30 June 2013 - 12:06 PM
Ah, yes, I just read back several pages and realised my mistake.
#493
Posted 30 June 2013 - 12:09 PM
#494
Posted 30 June 2013 - 12:12 PM
#495
Posted 01 July 2013 - 12:07 PM
Ok ive had a interesting morning
after i had been playing with all the ignition settings over the last week or so i have seen some good improvements (see above graphs) however i have noticed the exhaust has started to get sooty.
so i wanted to prove my theory that the fueling is now running rich after the ignition changes, so i did a other fuel learn session thinking that the fuel must not be right after the ignition changes,
whilst doing the fuel changes the exhausts have now gone back to the way they were,(NO SOOT)
and here are the results..
red line is average after a run in each direction
#497
Posted 01 July 2013 - 12:12 PM
The problem i have now im convinced i will get more from playing with the ignition again
SO TO ANSWER THE QUESTION WHAT CAME FIRST CHICKEN OR EGG?
You cant have one without the other.
so the more you work on the maps the more you will get.
but you cant have 1 without the other
Edited by CHILL Gone DUTCH, 01 July 2013 - 12:31 PM.
#498
Posted 01 July 2013 - 12:14 PM
PS
I really need to get a new job before i kill my car
#499
Posted 01 July 2013 - 12:16 PM
Diminishing returns. Yes, more adjustment to timing followed by fueling refinements may help, but since you're limited in power by the con rods what will you do with the gain?
#500
Posted 01 July 2013 - 12:18 PM
Diminishing returns. Yes, more adjustment to timing followed by fueling refinements may help, but since you're limited in power by the con rods what will you do with the gain?
It depends on where the gains are im no confident i can put the power where i want if there is anymore
5 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users