
Which Arb?
#281
Posted 19 March 2013 - 05:09 PM
#282
Posted 19 March 2013 - 05:27 PM
#283
Posted 19 March 2013 - 05:41 PM
Have to agree with Scuffers here. It just sounds like you are trying to get your NA done up for free Robin. I'm not sure what it will prove to anyone else or that anyone else is that bothered about your challenge.
:lol:/> I would pay for it if I wanted it.
I'm saying this is what need to be done if he wants the credibility he's asking for. Afterwards he could put it back how it was to be honest. I am very happy with it as is and do not feel the need for any of these bits. I was offering him the opportunity of the use of the car and an independant driver to add weight to his claims. I have no interest in keeping the parts.
:)/>
So whats the point in directing this at scuffers? I could make your car handle better.. His credability wont change as its such an easy task to complete..
What will give him credability is the following.
Mikes results from this years time attack, i have all the data from last year and the only thing thats changed this year is all the stuff scuffers has put on and setup.. If the car is faster than last year it gives scuffers some credability.
Well, I'm sure Scuffers will make Mike's car quicker by a big margin (i'll happily put money on it) Mike's car has had considerable upgrades such as a huge wing, big brakes, brake bias, big calipers all round, lighter discs, GThubs front & rear, wishbone mods, new arb, even more weight reduction, up-rated bushes, steering arms, aggressive Geo with big camber changes (-5?-6?) lower COG & probably a lot more besides. NO other VX will be quicker around a track IMO. I'm sure several will try though!
Mikes an excellent driver, but I'm sure he'll agree that Scuffers will drive his car even quicker around a track than himself, due to his experience.
#284
Posted 19 March 2013 - 05:42 PM
#285
Posted 19 March 2013 - 05:45 PM
#286
Posted 19 March 2013 - 06:06 PM
Edited by Bumblebee, 19 March 2013 - 06:26 PM.
#287
Posted 19 March 2013 - 06:22 PM

#288
Posted 19 March 2013 - 06:27 PM
I guess the next question is what has your car got on it now? (in suspension terms), what wheels/tyres do you run, etc.?
I have spent quite a bit of dosh on getting increasing the cars power and making it that power reasonably well delivered (for a 300bhp turbo) but the suspension needs an overhall as it has had 5 years of pounding on track and has done 60,000 miles. I just thought whilst it was all being done it might be an idea to upgrade the ARB as it wouldn't cost much overall.
I have some old nitrons. Not sure on spring rate they were on the car when i got it. They were refurbed a few years ago but may need re doing.
Wheels - 16 inch 17 inch combo. Toyo 888's for track and Khumo 39 for road.
Matt Bentley is going to give it a full refresh in terms of bushes etc and probably a replacement steering rack.
So...what arb for fast track work with some road driving....but 3rd car so not used on a daily basis.
#289
Posted 19 March 2013 - 06:27 PM
Thread going even further off topic .... thumbsdown/>
How's the Porsche?

#290
Posted 19 March 2013 - 06:31 PM

#291
Posted 19 March 2013 - 07:05 PM
that being the case, 1" no question, if your priority is track.I have some old nitrons. Not sure on spring rate they were on the car when i got it. They were refurbed a few years ago but may need re doing.
Wheels - 16 inch 17 inch combo. Toyo 888's for track and Khumo 39 for road.
Matt Bentley is going to give it a full refresh in terms of bushes etc and probably a replacement steering rack.
So...what arb for fast track work with some road driving....but 3rd car so not used on a daily basis.
Nitron wise, if they have been over 18 months or so, then yes, they are likely to have the gas charge depleted by now..
Also, I would advise replacing the R888's with Kuhmo V70's, they really are night and day better, my view is that they are at the moment, the best R spec tyre I have ever driven on, and size for size, very close to the performance of slicks, back to back, on a technical cct with a good mix of corners, I could get the V70's to 1 sec of the time I did on slicks (same car, same day etc), although over 10+ laps I could not maintain that pace on the V70's without letting them 'rest' again.
what else does your car have non-standard?
#292
Posted 19 March 2013 - 07:22 PM
#293
Posted 19 March 2013 - 07:28 PM
.
what else does your car have non-standard?
All the other mods are engine based. Charge cooled 300hhp.
Oh...forgot. Front AP 4 pot brakes with Performance Friction pads.
#294
Posted 19 March 2013 - 07:50 PM
What kind of mileage are we talking?Im coming away drom V70's now. They are brilliant tyres but the wear rate is unacceptable for me. I think i went through three full sets last year and seen as my car spends most of its time in pieces its not good. I normally go through 2 sets of rear R888's and one set of fronts a year but the kumhos seem to wear the fronts nearly as quickly as the rears. If your not bothered about lap times and your not loaded then i would stick to R888's.
I have been impressed at how low the wear rate is (Relatively So long as we are not talking the softs).
Kind of thinking your suspension/setup is too aggressive on them?
#295
Posted 19 March 2013 - 07:59 PM
#296
Posted 19 March 2013 - 08:24 PM
#297
Posted 20 March 2013 - 08:52 AM
quick look back, was it really 2008

#298
Posted 20 March 2013 - 09:16 AM
Nevs car never gets close to a track and he has a ridiculous amount of power to put through his rear wheels yet his fronts still wore nearly as quick as the rears.
The V70s do wear out bloody fast. I'd recommend using hard compound on the rears if you have decent power or they wont last long at all. I just use mine on the road and the rears only lasted about 3 or 4 thousand miles. The V70s don't need as much warming up as the R888s so are better for the road in that respect. Also their sidewall profile is very different to the R888s, without the buldge that help add a considerable element of softness/compliance to bumps. I feel the carcass of the V70s isn't strong enough as the centre line of my rears was worn 2 or 3 mm more than the outside edges. This is usually a sign of the centre line deflecting outwards due to centifugal forces, or perhaps they simply don't like running at around 26 PSI. My old R888s did not do this.
HTH.
Edited by Nev, 20 March 2013 - 09:18 AM.
#299
Posted 20 March 2013 - 09:26 AM
#300
Posted 20 March 2013 - 09:46 AM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users