

Quantum Zero Dampers
#21
Posted 20 April 2013 - 08:45 PM

#22
Posted 20 April 2013 - 09:08 PM
#23
Posted 20 April 2013 - 09:15 PM

#24
Posted 20 April 2013 - 09:17 PM
#25
Posted 20 April 2013 - 09:25 PM
Different ball game compare to sach to be honest specially if you drive with a spirited mind and had mine 6 years on the car btwCompared to the Sachs? Much difference in road use, as I find mine are fantastic.
I have 3 sach in good condition if you ever need spares :-)
#26
Posted 20 April 2013 - 09:26 PM
Sorry bob did my best as I am tired todayA good french write up there :D/>
Anyway if some don,t like my writing they can go to hell. Lol
Don,t forget the fab,s sock. For a good cause
Edited by Fab VX, 20 April 2013 - 09:26 PM.
#27
Posted 20 April 2013 - 09:27 PM
#28
Posted 20 April 2013 - 09:29 PM


#29
Posted 20 April 2013 - 09:30 PM
Well that's good to know tbh. It was like night and day when I fitted mine and went on track.
Ill be in the market next year for a more track focused set up and will bare quantum in mind.
The biggest problem with Sachs is you can,t service them
I had mine checked at a cost of £120.00 to find out one was gone
So quantum was my best solution after cliffy supplied me a good set
#30
Posted 20 April 2013 - 09:35 PM
Well that's good to know tbh. It was like night and day when I fitted mine and went on track.
Ill be in the market next year for a more track focused set up and will bare quantum in mind.
The biggest problem with Sachs is you can,t service them
I had mine checked at a cost of £120.00 to find out one was gone
So quantum was my best solution after cliffy supplied me a good set
Touch wood, rob999 looked after them well with little track use.
If they last me this track season, then ill be happy. The lack of serviceability is their down fall, however the progressive springs and valving is perfect for a learning track driver (like myself).

#31
Posted 21 April 2013 - 10:31 AM

#32
Posted 21 April 2013 - 11:42 AM
#33
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:01 PM
Trying to learn. When someone says that Nitrons do not have enough droop, what does that mean? And before I'm shot down, yes, I read some books (and they were even some amongst them about suspension :happy:/> ). As far as I understand total travel of a damper (or better, wheel, but we're talking dampers here and they determine the travel of the wheel) is droop + bump. Droop is the total downward movement available from static rideheight and bump the total upward movement. How much droop and bump you actually have depends on the rideheight, which depends on -among others- spring rate, spring pre-tension and damper length. Does the remark about not enough droop then refer to the Nitrons not having enough travel in general? Or to the inability to set ride height in combination with a preferred spring rate such that enough droop is still available?
something i posted elsewhere...
Just to illustrate the point, this is Syd's car with his new Quantum Blacks installed at sensible (road) ride heights (~125).
left is at ride hight, right is at full droop:


As you probably can't read the tape, it's showing some ~80mm of droop at the back wheels, whilst at the same time having plenty of bump travel available (even when using relatively soft springs).
As a comparison, this is his old Nitron 1 ways lined up against the new Quantum Blacks:


As you can see, they are not only longer fully open, but have way more 'travel' so that the closed lengths are not compromised (and actually marginally shorter than the Nitrons above).
here's a short video clip showing the level of droop:
http://vimeo.com/38482904
and looking from the back, this is the point where the wheel is still just in contact with the ground:

Obviously when cornering, the 'loaded' side would be down more, but you see the point, with less droop you would quickly get to the point where the unloaded wheel is off the ground, at which point it's doing nothing useful (and when people then complain they need an LSD)
#34
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:30 PM
#35
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:41 PM
#36
Posted 21 April 2013 - 01:19 PM
noSo, with all of this extra droop/travel/length/whatever, any danger of interference and subsequent damage with the subframe on the rear upper wishbones, like the standard Bilsteins and Nitrons?
why would you think that?
#37
Posted 21 April 2013 - 01:31 PM
#38
Posted 21 April 2013 - 01:50 PM
Edited by Mangham54, 21 April 2013 - 01:50 PM.
#39
Posted 21 April 2013 - 02:06 PM
ah, ok...Just that everything else seems to have had problems on the VX at some point in their development cycle with denting upper wishbones on bump. I assume there's some presumption that if it works on an Elise/Exige then it'll do exactly the same on the VX without further adjustment and that they've never actually seen the more heavily recessed upper wishbone mounts on the VX's subframe.
know what you mean, although ideal damper lengths between VX and Elise are the same.
if you ghetto the point of wishbone contact, the campers are too short and should have bumped out before then, also, to get to that point, the car is being run too low for the spring and damping rates chosen.
#40
Posted 21 April 2013 - 02:16 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users