
#1
Posted 28 November 2013 - 08:53 AM
#2
Posted 28 November 2013 - 09:11 AM
#3
Posted 28 November 2013 - 09:15 AM
I have driven an Elise on 888 back to back with my VX on 595's so not exactly a like for like, but I would agree with your statement above, that they arent quite as effective on track. Saying that though, everyone who has driven my car on track has commented on how impressed they were with the Federals. A set of 4 595 I think was under £330 when I bought them and thats a huge saving over 888.
I for one will be buying another set of 595, I have been impressed with them in all weathers and seemed to be competent on track, plus good value.
Edited by jamesclarkson, 28 November 2013 - 09:17 AM.
#4
Posted 28 November 2013 - 10:49 AM
#5
Posted 28 November 2013 - 10:53 AM
#6
Posted 28 November 2013 - 12:18 PM
#7
Posted 28 November 2013 - 12:22 PM
having tried the RS-R rear in 225/45/17 and 235/40/17 , the extra width helps stop the rear sliding and makes it much better for longer runs and overall wear. Might try the 255/40/17 next.
available sizes for EU , http://www.federalti...c595RS-R_Eu.pdf
#8
Posted 28 November 2013 - 01:09 PM
Edited by Acidpopstar, 28 November 2013 - 01:09 PM.
#9
Posted 28 November 2013 - 01:14 PM
Out of interest did you get the 235/40/17s on standard size rear wheels?
They are a C*nt to fit on a 7.5" width wheel I'd heard.. 235/45/17 fitted no probs though :-)
#10
Posted 28 November 2013 - 01:20 PM
Out of interest did you get the 235/40/17s on standard size rear wheels?
failed to fit them to TD 1.2 7.5J wheel , but no problems with 9J
#11
Posted 28 November 2013 - 06:28 PM
I'll echo most of the above, I've had several sets of 888's and i'm on my first set of 595's, i've covered about 5k, the rears are on there way to needing replacing and the fronts are still fine.
The 595's are definitely better in standing water, but i'd say on par with the 888's in normal wet conditions.
I paid £328 delivered for 16/17's
One thing add which i don't think has been mentioned, I find the 595's very good when they do let go, and around their/my limits.
#12
Posted 28 November 2013 - 06:37 PM
Out of interest did you get the 235/40/17s on standard size rear wheels?
They are a C*nt to fit on a 7.5" width wheel I'd heard..
Ive heard this few times too, i'd love to try it though, anyone with a worn one they want to send on to me? i'll pay the postage
#13
Posted 29 November 2013 - 09:20 AM
Interesting, thanks all.
Of course the other option is the Kumho V70A which I have seen in action and know its great, but think the softs dont last at all so medium would be the choice. Slightly cheAPer than 888's but still notably more than RSR's.
So far £596 for the V70A'S.
Martin S
#14
Posted 29 November 2013 - 09:29 AM
#15
Posted 29 November 2013 - 09:31 AM
If it comes to grip in the dry I reckon the 888's are better (never had RSR's before but gonna get them for my new ATS wheels).
I think a comparrison to R1R's would be more fair since both tires have threadwear of 140 (softness) but the RSR is still about 30% cheaper in price.
With all the reviews Í've seen the RSR's seems like a no-brainer for daily-to-occasionally track-use cars?!
#16
Posted 29 November 2013 - 09:32 AM
I'll echo most of the above, I've had several sets of 888's and i'm on my first set of 595's, i've covered about 5k, the rears are on there way to needing replacing and the fronts are still fine.
The 595's are definitely better in standing water, but i'd say on par with the 888's in normal wet conditions.
I paid £328 delivered for 16/17's
One thing add which i don't think has been mentioned, I find the 595's very good when they do let go, and around their/my limits.
the RS-R fronts seem very durable
I also never like the R888 front tyre , it felt clumsy and imprecise.
#17
Posted 29 November 2013 - 09:35 AM
On my last Le Mans trackday I switched from half worn down R888 to brand new RSR 595 and was VERY well pleased with them. I liked the extra 'feedback' and 'feel' I got from the 595 compared to R888. Two days later I drove them on Dijon during that massive thunderstorm and as long as they kept temperature performed very well. Only had some issues with the front locking up under hard braking, but never felt 'out of control' when cornering.
If you compare the cost between the two I wont be buying a new set R888 any time soon!
Edited by Denthrax, 29 November 2013 - 09:36 AM.
#18
Posted 29 November 2013 - 10:38 AM
#19
Posted 29 November 2013 - 10:40 AM
Interesting reading The fronts are brilliant especially braking and turn in (595s) but I'm not convinced by rears especially traction
the 225/45 is narrower , if you put them side by side
#20
Posted 29 November 2013 - 10:43 AM
Will check sizes when I get home can't remember, It was a year agothe 225/45 is narrower , if you put them side by sideInteresting reading The fronts are brilliant especially braking and turn in (595s) but I'm not convinced by rears especially traction
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users