Project 'cash In The Attic' - Sc Conversion
#101
Posted 04 February 2014 - 04:43 PM
#102
Posted 04 February 2014 - 04:48 PM
Having experienced both ECUs first hand (admittedly not owned a CS mapped one), I'm surprised anyone opts to go for a CS map with this as an option.
If you want someone to look over it I may be able to help.
#103
Posted 04 February 2014 - 05:13 PM
unfortunately for me, the CS map is paid for and I cant bring myself to change ECU... "just because"
#104
Posted 04 February 2014 - 07:41 PM
#105
Posted 04 February 2014 - 07:43 PM
unfortunately for me, the CS map is paid for and I cant bring myself to change ECU... "just because"
Completely agree. If I already had a CS mad I would stick with it, but starting again it makes sense to go for the OBDtuner. It produces a much better map.
#106
Posted 10 February 2014 - 02:40 PM
Can anyone confirm whether this bosch water pump will do the job for the Charge cooler:-
http://www.ebay.co.u...=item43c5836ca5
I'm sure I've seen others use this type of pump in other SC builds.
#107
Posted 10 February 2014 - 02:42 PM
#108
Posted 10 February 2014 - 03:11 PM
In terms of performance it looks like it has a brushless motor giving 900l/hr and a pressure of 0.1 bar. The one that people usually go for seems to have a flow rate of 1200l/hr with a pressure of 0.3bar.
From the bosch website(page 122/123 http://www.ipar.nl/a...ktromotoren.pdf );
Edited by Captain Vimes, 10 February 2014 - 03:12 PM.
#109
Posted 10 February 2014 - 03:20 PM
Should do, however most applications are front engined so the charger cooler circuit has much less head pressure
#110
Posted 10 February 2014 - 05:47 PM
If I'm not mistaken there are 2 Bosch PAD pumps . A smaller one and the correct size with 19mm connections. This looks like the small one.
#111
Posted 10 February 2014 - 07:31 PM
Thanks - just checked with the seller and he's confirmed that the inlet/outlet is 19mm.
Think I'm going to go for this one. I like the fact it's brushless and therefore more reliable plus I'm going to be running a slightly smaller rad than the pro-alloy one so water capacity (head pressure?) will be a little lower than some other setups anyway.
#112
Posted 10 February 2014 - 07:55 PM
Just noticed the link above doesn't work, for future reference here it is again:
http://www.ipar.nl/a...ktromotoren.pdf
Part number I'm looking at is: 0 392 023 004 on page 123.
And a previous post from Bargi has all the details for the connector (thanks):-
If you've brought Bosch Additional Water Pump 0 392 023 004 here or similar the VW connector with code 1J0 973 702 does NOT fit
Spec of plug here
Plug is Tyco Timer Connector Housing 2.8mm, JPT here
Connector and seal can be brought from www.polevolt.co.uk
[font="arial, sans-serif;"]3-8270 J.P.T. female terminals [/font][font="arial, sans-serif;"]1-2.5mm[/font]
[font="arial, sans-serif;"]10658 J.P.T. wire seals. White.[/font][font="arial, sans-serif;"] 1-2.5mm[/font]
For future reference to anyone who hasn't brought their pump yet is don't get hung up on looking for the exact Bosch pump, any decent one will do and as Lee mentions their plenty cheap on fleabay
#113
Posted 10 February 2014 - 07:56 PM
Doesn't work like that, if anything the head pressure will be higher as the resistance (number of pathways in the radiator) is reduced.
That said, we all know the charge cooling setup is generally an overkill for these cars, so i doubt you'll have a problem. Just a shame the seller with the 15 L/min units has doubled the price - i got mine for £60
#114
Posted 20 April 2014 - 04:43 PM
#115
Posted 20 April 2014 - 04:48 PM
#116
Posted 20 April 2014 - 04:52 PM
you will not need bigger injectors or a 68mm TB for 170bhp, not worth doing until SC
#117
Posted 20 April 2014 - 05:09 PM
As long as they don't reduce the power I may as well fit them as they're sitting in the garage doing nothing. It'll give me a chance to test they work and play with the software..you will not need bigger injectors or a 68mm TB for 170bhp, not worth doing until SC
#118
Posted 20 April 2014 - 05:13 PM
#119
Posted 20 April 2014 - 05:34 PM
#120
Posted 20 April 2014 - 06:26 PM
Hi Captain, I would be interested to see how you get on with this step two! I'm thinking of doing the same thing as well maybe getting the Dutch software as a step 1 Would be interested to hear what gains you can get of a map! If I did go SC I would only go to stage one for reliability.... Contrary to popular belief I've seen quite a few failures of stage two cars. I think if you really use them hard on track they are not quite as reliable as some believe. I would rather sacrifice some power for overall reliability..... Firthy
I'll keep the thread updated with all progress. Ideally I'd do one thing at a time and test the difference that each makes. I expect the map will make a reasonable difference but don't really expect the injectors or TB to do anything - maybe a couple of bhp right at the VERY top of the rev range.
Mark Verboom's site is good for this if you hadn't already found it - https://www.verboom....ster/index.html Mark got 4bhp from the TB when combined with some other mods:
https://www.verboom....0606/index.html
With regard to reliability - like you I am a little nervous of what it's like with hard track use. What failures have you seen? My gut feel is that the issue is less to do with the amount of power and more to do with the high intake temps from the SC on extended track sessions - the Laminova's are not up to the task. My current thoughts are to either-
- Stage 1.5 - change for a larger pulley and aim for 220bhp but still running a chargecooler with dual pass mod. This should bring the charger back into it's efficiency range and allow the laminova's to keep it cool.
- Stage 2 (250 bhp) and add some extra cooling - either Lee's additional cooler or water injection - plus keep the max revs down to something sensible (6500rpm?)
I'm also going to run the vxr injectors to ensure that the injectors are not at full duty cycle which should allow some headroom to add more fuel and keep detonation under control.
Edited by Captain Vimes, 20 April 2014 - 06:28 PM.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users