Project 'once'
#721
Posted 07 July 2015 - 08:52 PM
#722
Posted 07 July 2015 - 09:02 PM
I'm going with the word conservative Joe Looking at earlier posts (was it smiley) it seems in line with what can be expected from the 2-litreHmm is this with a 2.9" pulley? If so is this not a little low or am I wrong?
#723
Posted 07 July 2015 - 09:05 PM
Edited by Nev, 07 July 2015 - 09:06 PM.
#724
Posted 07 July 2015 - 09:07 PM
#725
Posted 07 July 2015 - 09:10 PM
I'm going with the word conservative Joe Looking at earlier posts (was it smiley) it seems in line with what can be expected from the 2-litre
Depends slightly on the cut off of course.
Let's wait for the graph. That should show it.
#726
Posted 07 July 2015 - 09:12 PM
#727
Posted 07 July 2015 - 09:13 PM
#728
Posted 07 July 2015 - 09:13 PM
#729
Posted 07 July 2015 - 09:16 PM
Edited by Graeme Lambert, 07 July 2015 - 09:18 PM.
#730
Posted 07 July 2015 - 09:18 PM
To be fair this isnt the complete development on the car and map, but for now it allows me to move on and progress with the rest of the project. Maybe next year, once I've had a summers worth of use I'll go for moreStick a 2.8 pulley on
#731
Posted 07 July 2015 - 09:20 PM
#732
Posted 07 July 2015 - 09:22 PM
#733
Posted 07 July 2015 - 09:24 PM
#734
Posted 07 July 2015 - 09:28 PM
Yeah not sure if bills was on this dyno (jamsport) or the one he used to use (1320 mini) And yes, I'm soooooooo looking forward to driving the thing. Realise that'll be a whole off yet. I'm budgeting 2 months for paint and 1 month to finish interior trim. I'm hoping I'm being generous... Just in time for my wedding, and to put it away for winter. Spring next year should be funYes it's running on the standalone That needs to be applauded Bills ran on a RR that MB uses
#735
Posted 07 July 2015 - 09:30 PM
I think he uses two different places.Bills ran on a RR that MB uses
#736
Posted 07 July 2015 - 09:36 PM
#737
Posted 07 July 2015 - 09:37 PM
#738
Posted 07 July 2015 - 09:42 PM
#739
Posted 08 July 2015 - 06:31 AM
it's basic maths, well probably
the 2.0 is roughly a 9% smaller engine then the 2.2, so as a very rough guide you should expect 9% less power. The 2.2 Harrop with similar parts would be roughly 350 bhp, take away 9% and you get 325 bhp
Yes I know that is total crap way of working it out, but I did say it's a very rough guide
#740
Posted 08 July 2015 - 06:51 AM
350 x 0.91 = 318.5bhp I think it was insider knowledgeit's basic maths, well probably the 2.0 is roughly a 9% smaller engine then the 2.2, so as a very rough guide you should expect 9% less power. The 2.2 Harrop with similar parts would be roughly 350 bhp, take away 9% and you get 325 bhp Yes I know that is total crap way of working it out, but I did say it's a very rough guide
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: saab, b207, supercharged, m62, ats dtc, composite worx, re-spray, coupe
The Market Place →
Car Parts For Sale →
Piper 2.5” Manifold And Miltek Mid Section For Z22seStarted by F757lkk@gmail.com , 30 Jun 2024 exhaust, manifold, z22se, na and 2 more... |
|
|
||
General Discussion →
Tuning & Modifications →
Supercharged Exhaust AdviceStarted by Donmizzi , 28 Jan 2021 exhaust, supercharged |
|
|
||
General Discussion →
VX220 Discussion →
Looking To Join The Sc Club - Advice Please...Started by JamieShand , 06 Sep 2019 sc, 2.2, supercharged, stage 2 |
|
|
||
General Discussion →
VX220 Discussion →
Ebay Coupe Rear KitStarted by gazbucko , 23 Apr 2019 ebay, coupe, rear, kit |
|
|
||
The Market Place →
Car Parts Wanted →
Coupe Rear Kit Wanted!Started by gazbucko , 23 Apr 2019 coupe, rear, kit |
|
|
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users