Jump to content


Photo

Project 'once'

saab b207 supercharged m62 ats dtc composite worx re-spray coupe

  • Please log in to reply
1145 replies to this topic

#741 smiley

smiley

    Thetan level 15

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,427 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 08 July 2015 - 07:56 AM

imagine what a harrop with a 2.8 pully on a 2.4 could do :tt:



#742 Graeme Lambert

Graeme Lambert

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,543 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Steeple Claydon, Buckinghamshire

Posted 08 July 2015 - 09:28 AM

Graph is in...

 

I'll await the comments 

 

Posted Image

 

Sam did mention he had some wheelspin at the top-end, and that their dyno doesn't read as high as the other one Matt uses (Which I take to be 1320 MINI)



#743 Rosssco

Rosssco

    Scary Internerd

  • 4,181 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Aberdeen

Posted 08 July 2015 - 09:34 AM

340 lb/ft seems very high / impressive, especially for a 2.0

 

340 Nm = 250 lb/ft, which seems more realistic given the spec?



#744 techieboy

techieboy

    Supercharger of Doom

  • 22,914 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bedford

Posted 08 July 2015 - 09:42 AM

Torque line doesn't follow the "usual" SC flat line. Weird. :unsure:

#745 Graeme Lambert

Graeme Lambert

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,543 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Steeple Claydon, Buckinghamshire

Posted 08 July 2015 - 09:46 AM

Torque line doesn't follow the "usual" SC flat line. Weird. :unsure:

Wasn't just me that thought that then. To my (untrained) eyes it looks more like a turbo graph with the torque plot like that?

#746 CocoPops

CocoPops

    SuperCharged Karting Super Hero

  • 17,180 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thatcham, Berks

Posted 08 July 2015 - 09:54 AM

Does seem quite a drop off in torque, I was trying to find some other graphs to compare. But your sig link demonstrates other curves Matt.

#747 techieboy

techieboy

    Supercharger of Doom

  • 22,914 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bedford

Posted 08 July 2015 - 09:57 AM

I think this was Nick's original Harrop dyno run at Courtenay's before they de-tuned it and shows the more classic torque line that we're used to and a ~40ftlb loss from peak across the range

Posted Image

Did you end up using that shonky Lotus specific Harrop? Wonder if there is any difference there? What needed to be done to get it to fit your engine/inlet?

#748 leevx2.2

leevx2.2

    Turbo's are for girls and throttle bodies are too slow

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,830 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bedford
  • Interests:Taking apart vx220s for fun
    getting p!!sed
    genraly playing with large power tools

Posted 08 July 2015 - 10:05 AM

I wouldn't say that was a supercharged graph doesn't look right to me

#749 Graeme Lambert

Graeme Lambert

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,543 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Steeple Claydon, Buckinghamshire

Posted 08 July 2015 - 10:10 AM

Cam timing issue? And yes Matt it's the lotus harrop. There was problems with the actuator being a bit on/off

#750 siztenboots

siztenboots

    RaceMode

  • 26,611 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Surrey
  • Interests:french maids

Posted 08 July 2015 - 10:18 AM

seems to reach its peak breathing, then efficiency drops off, looks fine

 

what camshaft spec / SC pulley?

 

got at least 40 / 50 torque better than Nick's



#751 Graeme Lambert

Graeme Lambert

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,543 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Steeple Claydon, Buckinghamshire

Posted 08 July 2015 - 10:19 AM

Zzp stg2 cams and a 2.9/2.95 pulley

#752 techieboy

techieboy

    Supercharger of Doom

  • 22,914 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bedford

Posted 08 July 2015 - 10:24 AM

I wouldn't say that was a supercharged graph doesn't look right to me

Yeah, the more I look at it, the odder it looks. Ross is right, that's mega torque but neither the bhp or torque lines follow the usual SC pattern in that graph. I guess if the tyres did start slipping at ~5700rpm and he backed off, that would bugger the usual continually increasing bhp line to the rev limit and make the top end numbers worthless.

#753 CocoPops

CocoPops

    SuperCharged Karting Super Hero

  • 17,180 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thatcham, Berks

Posted 08 July 2015 - 10:26 AM

Even if you ignore 5,700+ figures, the torque still has too much of a curve though?

#754 NickB787

NickB787

    Gone but not forgotten

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,813 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bedford

Posted 08 July 2015 - 10:26 AM

Must admit does look a bit unusual for a Harrow s/c graph, are they adjustable cams or Luger cams

#755 techieboy

techieboy

    Supercharger of Doom

  • 22,914 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bedford

Posted 08 July 2015 - 10:28 AM

Even if you ignore 5,700+ figures, the torque still has too much of a curve though?

Agreed. Need one of the Dutch or German guys with a Harroped 2.0 litre to post up a graph or two.

#756 NickB787

NickB787

    Gone but not forgotten

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,813 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bedford

Posted 08 July 2015 - 10:40 AM

I was looking for my z20let ecu dyno run, seem to remember it looked not too dissimilar.

#757 CocoPops

CocoPops

    SuperCharged Karting Super Hero

  • 17,180 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thatcham, Berks

Posted 08 July 2015 - 10:41 AM

http://www.vx220.org...ions/?p=1618207
Posted Image

#758 Nev

Nev

    Nipper's Minion

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,587 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bristol
  • Interests:Rock climbing, skiing, kayaking, surfing, mountaineering, budgies, chess, practical mechanics.

Posted 08 July 2015 - 11:00 AM

Your torque curve is dropping off due to VE % dropping off. This is most likely due to a flow restriction of either the inlet charge or the exhaust gas. Anything from poorly flowing head, poor swirl, poor scavenging, CC causing turbulence etc etc. Quite hard to pin down most probably, as it could be loads of things. The easier things to eliminate might be to do the follow, do a dyno pull and see if the problem is alleviated: 1. Remove exhaust + manifold. 2. Remove airbox + inlet pipework. 3. Remove the laminovas or whatever CC restriction you have.

Edited by Nev, 08 July 2015 - 11:03 AM.


#759 siztenboots

siztenboots

    RaceMode

  • 26,611 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Surrey
  • Interests:french maids

Posted 08 July 2015 - 11:06 AM

or air filter choking



#760 Rosssco

Rosssco

    Scary Internerd

  • 4,181 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Aberdeen

Posted 08 July 2015 - 11:17 AM

Your torque curve is dropping off due to VE % dropping off. This is most likely due to a flow restriction of either the inlet charge or the exhaust gas. Anything from poorly flowing head, poor swirl, poor scavenging, CC causing turbulence etc etc. Quite hard to pin down most probably, as it could be loads of things. The easier things to eliminate might be to do the follow, do a dyno pull and see if the problem is alleviated: 1. Remove exhaust + manifold. 2. Remove airbox + inlet pipework. 3. Remove the laminovas or whatever CC restriction you have.

 

Out with practical considerations, won't removing the exhaust manifold have a detrimental effect on engine efficiency? Plus, where do you mount any lambda sensors?

 

Removing laminovas would result in the whole thing becoming completely heatsoaked in short order. Those that have run without them only temporarily have reported this.







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: saab, b207, supercharged, m62, ats dtc, composite worx, re-spray, coupe

3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users