Project 'once'
#1001
Posted 14 August 2015 - 06:18 PM
#1002
Posted 14 August 2015 - 06:22 PM
Are you happy with the results G?
Raw numbers are the same as the one he posted a few weeks back, so while the graphs are more defined, there's a clear issue above 5.5k
#1003
Posted 14 August 2015 - 06:26 PM
#1004
Posted 14 August 2015 - 06:28 PM
The weird thing is, it's such a clean graph that it reminds me of any ECU limited power curve, as if it were limiting fuelling or ignition.
#1005
Posted 15 August 2015 - 05:26 PM
I made 335pk with the same pulley and 395nm torque. That was with a blowing exhaust which was throwing the lambda's out. Peak power was at 6600rpm.
As we know, your spec is probably the closest to mine - save for exhaust and ECU etc really (plus my sandwich plate) so will be interested to see what your new figure is when exhaust not blowing etc.
#1006
Posted 15 August 2015 - 07:27 PM
You need to find out if your compression ratio changed with the forged pistons Matt fitted. That will have a direct effect on your power as less compression will lower the figures but with less heat as a bonus. Tullets exhaust repacking system decided to undo itself and slide apart on track. Not having much luck with my exhaust systems. currently being re packed and upgraded while I sun myself on the old honeymoon. Not long now Graeme for you.As we know, your spec is probably the closest to mine - save for exhaust and ECU etc really (plus my sandwich plate) so will be interested to see what your new figure is when exhaust not blowing etc.I made 335pk with the same pulley and 395nm torque. That was with a blowing exhaust which was throwing the lambda's out. Peak power was at 6600rpm.
#1007
Posted 24 August 2015 - 12:43 PM
Does the lambda change above 5500 rpm?
If not, i'd want to fit a different charger without the sandwich plate.
why?
Chill got his 2.5" exhaust system above 300 (just), so I don't think the 2.5" manifold is to blame. The rest of the exhaust is unknown. As is your combination of charger and plate. My bias says it's the plate, because I don't think making the inlet manifold any more restrictive is a good idea.
also, is it painted yet?
Not sure about Lambda changing above 5,500rpm. All I know is my AFR at WOT was 12.3. according to Sam who mapped it.
Are you happy with the results G?
After the original map, with the turbo-like torque delivery, I said to Matt I'd be happy with the peak numbers (320bhp) as long as the curve evened out ab it more and looked more traditionally supercharged. Until I actually drive it (and it has some on the road mapping) I can't really comment on whether I'm happy or not though.
Are you happy with the results G?
Raw numbers are the same as the one he posted a few weeks back, so while the graphs are more defined, there's a clear issue above 5.5k
Yes numbers are the same, but less boost with larger pulley this time. When the new pulley was attached it was still running rather rich and made less, so this graph is when the fuelling has been tweaked. Matt is confident it will make more power when a smaller pulley is used. We'll have to wait and see I guess.
Regarding the sandwich plate, Lee used one also and I don't think he found it to be causing a restriction?
You need to find out if your compression ratio changed with the forged pistons Matt fitted. That will have a direct effect on your power as less compression will lower the figures but with less heat as a bonus.
I made 335pk with the same pulley and 395nm torque. That was with a blowing exhaust which was throwing the lambda's out. Peak power was at 6600rpm.
As we know, your spec is probably the closest to mine - save for exhaust and ECU etc really (plus my sandwich plate) so will be interested to see what your new figure is when exhaust not blowing etc.
Tullets exhaust repacking system decided to undo itself and slide apart on track. Not having much luck with my exhaust systems. currently being re packed and upgraded while I sun myself on the old honeymoon.
Not long now Graeme for you.
Indeed. I don't know what compression the engine is running at. We really need Matt to come on here and comment to confirm. Keep enjoying the honeymoon - I'm just at the point of enjoying hating paying the balance of all the bills.... (for the wedding, not the car!)
#1008
Posted 24 August 2015 - 01:47 PM
Does the lambda change above 5500 rpm?
If not, i'd want to fit a different charger without the sandwich plate.
why?
Chill got his 2.5" exhaust system above 300 (just), so I don't think the 2.5" manifold is to blame. The rest of the exhaust is unknown. As is your combination of charger and plate. My bias says it's the plate, because I don't think making the inlet manifold any more restrictive is a good idea.
also, is it painted yet?
Not sure about Lambda changing above 5,500rpm. All I know is my AFR at WOT was 12.3. according to Sam who mapped it.
Mine was never RR tested but when running back to back with more powerful cars it was comparable so im confident it was running 305 HP + and had a larger 3.1 pulley and had a AFR of 11.8 with a M62 charger
#1009
Posted 24 August 2015 - 03:32 PM
And we all know that different rolling roads give different numbers too... For now I think we need to move onto the next stage and sort bodyworkMine was never RR tested but when running back to back with more powerful cars it was comparable so im confident it was running 305 HP + and had a larger 3.1 pulley and had a AFR of 11.8 with a M62 charger
Not sure about Lambda changing above 5,500rpm. All I know is my AFR at WOT was 12.3. according to Sam who mapped it.Does the lambda change above 5500 rpm? If not, i'd want to fit a different charger without the sandwich plate. why? Chill got his 2.5" exhaust system above 300 (just), so I don't think the 2.5" manifold is to blame. The rest of the exhaust is unknown. As is your combination of charger and plate. My bias says it's the plate, because I don't think making the inlet manifold any more restrictive is a good idea. also, is it painted yet?
#1010
Posted 24 August 2015 - 03:57 PM
Yep get driving it and then take it from thereAnd we all know that different rolling roads give different numbers too... For now I think we need to move onto the next stage and sort bodyworkMine was never RR tested but when running back to back with more powerful cars it was comparable so im confident it was running 305 HP + and had a larger 3.1 pulley and had a AFR of 11.8 with a M62 charger
Not sure about Lambda changing above 5,500rpm. All I know is my AFR at WOT was 12.3. according to Sam who mapped it.Does the lambda change above 5500 rpm? If not, i'd want to fit a different charger without the sandwich plate. why? Chill got his 2.5" exhaust system above 300 (just), so I don't think the 2.5" manifold is to blame. The rest of the exhaust is unknown. As is your combination of charger and plate. My bias says it's the plate, because I don't think making the inlet manifold any more restrictive is a good idea. also, is it painted yet?
#1011
Posted 24 August 2015 - 03:58 PM
Well that won't be until 2016 as it doesn't make any sense to do anything with it earlier - especially in terms of insurance.Yep get driving it and then take it from thereAnd we all know that different rolling roads give different numbers too... For now I think we need to move onto the next stage and sort bodyworkMine was never RR tested but when running back to back with more powerful cars it was comparable so im confident it was running 305 HP + and had a larger 3.1 pulley and had a AFR of 11.8 with a M62 charger
Not sure about Lambda changing above 5,500rpm. All I know is my AFR at WOT was 12.3. according to Sam who mapped it.Does the lambda change above 5500 rpm? If not, i'd want to fit a different charger without the sandwich plate. why? Chill got his 2.5" exhaust system above 300 (just), so I don't think the 2.5" manifold is to blame. The rest of the exhaust is unknown. As is your combination of charger and plate. My bias says it's the plate, because I don't think making the inlet manifold any more restrictive is a good idea. also, is it painted yet?
#1012
Posted 16 November 2015 - 06:26 PM
#1013
Posted 16 November 2015 - 09:46 PM
#1014
Posted 16 November 2015 - 09:50 PM
#1015
Posted 16 November 2015 - 09:58 PM
Sadly, there are mechanical and installation issues that need rectifying first. Therefore bodywork only progressing in background.That was from ages ago!
#1016
Posted 16 November 2015 - 09:58 PM
#1017
Posted 16 November 2015 - 09:59 PM
Wouldn't yet be fair to discuss on an open forumOoo what issues?
#1018
Posted 21 January 2016 - 07:14 AM
#1019
Posted 21 January 2016 - 07:19 AM
I hope this project isn't going to fade away, so much effort in it, keep going G
#1020
Posted 21 January 2016 - 08:24 AM
I hope this project isn't going to fade away, so much effort in it, keep going G
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: saab, b207, supercharged, m62, ats dtc, composite worx, re-spray, coupe
The Market Place →
Car Parts For Sale →
Piper 2.5” Manifold And Miltek Mid Section For Z22seStarted by F757lkk@gmail.com , 30 Jun 2024 exhaust, manifold, z22se, na and 2 more... |
|
|
||
General Discussion →
Tuning & Modifications →
Supercharged Exhaust AdviceStarted by Donmizzi , 28 Jan 2021 exhaust, supercharged |
|
|
||
General Discussion →
VX220 Discussion →
Looking To Join The Sc Club - Advice Please...Started by JamieShand , 06 Sep 2019 sc, 2.2, supercharged, stage 2 |
|
|
||
General Discussion →
VX220 Discussion →
Ebay Coupe Rear KitStarted by gazbucko , 23 Apr 2019 ebay, coupe, rear, kit |
|
|
||
The Market Place →
Car Parts Wanted →
Coupe Rear Kit Wanted!Started by gazbucko , 23 Apr 2019 coupe, rear, kit |
|
|
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users