Z22Se Engine Liners
#21
Posted 09 April 2014 - 10:57 PM
#22
Posted 09 April 2014 - 11:28 PM
#23
Posted 10 April 2014 - 05:46 AM
#24
Posted 10 April 2014 - 05:46 AM
#25
Posted 10 April 2014 - 06:56 AM
#26
Posted 10 April 2014 - 08:12 AM
You're not the first sc owner to not get on with the 4.17 gear ratio.
thats no surprise.
Really Rough rule of thumb:
Revvy (usually N/A engine) = 4+ FD
Less revvy (Usuaully forced induction) = <4 FD
With forced induction you simply do not need the extra leverage the higher FD offers, especially when you are then made to shift regularly.
#27
Posted 10 April 2014 - 09:09 AM
That is a lot of power for your engine specs.
I only know of 1 other Z22SE build that got 400BHP (399.8...) and that was a full blown turbo conversion running 1.63bar boost.
Did you change the 4.17 gearbox ratio's in the OBD power measurement??
#28
Posted 10 April 2014 - 09:26 AM
Edited by haggi961, 10 April 2014 - 09:27 AM.
#29
Posted 10 April 2014 - 09:33 AM
Good point, the 4.17 FD box will definitely skew the numbers. Won't affect the map in any way but will make the power calculation think you've got more power as the car is accelerating quicker than with the standard FD box.
#30
Posted 10 April 2014 - 09:38 AM
#31
Posted 10 April 2014 - 09:44 AM
The OBD power measurement is a measurement of acceleration vs. time, so it will very much skew your numbers if your gearbox ratio is not correct.
It already gives wrong numbers if your tire circumference is deviating...
Edited by Exmantaa, 10 April 2014 - 09:45 AM.
#32
Posted 10 April 2014 - 09:46 AM
#33
Posted 10 April 2014 - 09:48 AM
#34
Posted 10 April 2014 - 09:54 AM
Face it, you haven't got 400bhp.
You could probably get a rough idea if you get a couple of good road speed readings at say 3,000rpm and maybe 4,000rpm in 3rd or 4th gear and calculate back (or compare it to a gear ratio calculator chart).
Still open to some skew depending on exact tyre sizes though.
#35
Posted 10 April 2014 - 09:55 AM
I think the reason I was slower due to my injector leaking as it did feel slow compered to power runs I was doing.
You have a boost leak passed the lower o-ring seal of the 60lb's? Do you have the grey inserts/adapters fitted with the rail raiser blocks? That should cure this definately.
I think the 60's are a tiny bit taller than the original injectors and therefore may stick too far into the head with possible leakage. Might help to simply raise them a bit by fitting some washers under the rail mountiings. (Maybe elongate the mounting holes for better fitment as the injectors are under an angle.)
Edited by Exmantaa, 10 April 2014 - 09:59 AM.
#36
Posted 10 April 2014 - 10:00 AM
#37
Posted 10 April 2014 - 10:04 AM
At any given speed, your engine will be doing more rpm's with the 4.17FD.
#38
Posted 10 April 2014 - 10:05 AM
My injector leaking is because of this so I've spoke to Peter and he says use a couple of washers and raise it buy 2mm, I take its the same thing as the raiser blocks? Do you know where the raiser blocks are for sale so I can buy a set?You have a boost leak passed the lower o-ring seal of the 60lb's? Do you have the grey inserts/adapters fitted with the rail raiser blocks? That should cure this definately. I think the 60's are a tiny bit taller than the original injectors and therefore may stick too far into the head with possible leakage. Might help to simply raise them a bit by fitting some washers under the rail mountiings. (Maybe elongate the mounting holes for better fitment as the injectors are under an angle.)I think the reason I was slower due to my injector leaking as it did feel slow compered to power runs I was doing.
#39
Posted 10 April 2014 - 10:06 AM
#40
Posted 10 April 2014 - 10:07 AM
If anyone is using there vx today could they please tell me what there revs are at say 30mph.At any given speed, your engine will be doing more rpm's with the 4.17FD.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users