From memory I think CS use the 3.1as their standard pulley on a stage 2sc set upAnyone know what boost levels we see with the various pulleys 3.5(?),3.35, 3.1, 2.9? I assume that the standard pulley (3.35") would see the boost sitting in the efficient range for the m62?

Supercharged Intake Temps
#361
Posted 29 June 2014 - 03:59 PM
#362
Posted 29 June 2014 - 04:28 PM
#363
Posted 29 June 2014 - 05:01 PM
From memory I think CS use the 3.1as their standard pulley on a stage 2sc set upAnyone know what boost levels we see with the various pulleys 3.5(?),3.35, 3.1, 2.9? I assume that the standard pulley (3.35") would see the boost sitting in the efficient range for the m62?
The standard pulley size is 3.35" for stage 2, and a mapped for a 7k rm limit by CS. Smaller pulleys such as a 3.1" tend to be mapped with a lower rev limiter, typically 6.5k rpm, as this pulley size can bring some engines into the danger zone of ~270bhp (where rods can part company on a standard Z22SE..)
#364
Posted 01 July 2014 - 09:02 AM
How big is the crank pulley?
6.53"
At 7000rpm the m62 runs at 13644rpm with 3.35" pulley.
#365
Posted 15 July 2014 - 11:10 AM
#366
Posted 15 July 2014 - 11:38 AM
#367
Posted 15 July 2014 - 12:00 PM
has anyone messed around with using a Saab turbo intake manifold, shifting the s/c down lower? and using a good water /air charge cooler? might be a project for winter?
The OEM SC manifold provides for the air intake ducting, the chargecooling and also supercharger mounting/allignment...
Replace for a Saab manifold (it does flow better for higher cfm's) and you will need to solve the other two functions. And I forgot the SC bypass operation. It's not easy...
(Did I mention that available space is very limited?)
- Here insert links to the earlier threads about this...
-
-
-
#368
Posted 15 July 2014 - 01:24 PM
I tried with an M90. I looked at mounting it low by the sump but it was still too tight. I even put a short snout on a later M90 to generate more room but it didn't work. The current system is packaged very well.
#369
Posted 15 July 2014 - 01:41 PM
#370
Posted 15 July 2014 - 02:40 PM
Edited by Exmantaa, 15 July 2014 - 02:41 PM.
#371
Posted 15 July 2014 - 02:50 PM
Admit defeat put a larger pulley on the SC and enjoy driving it. Easier said than done.
This... Stop chasing pub power numbers you fcuk nuggets
#372
Posted 15 July 2014 - 02:52 PM
is it the same as the VXR GTC , I have been looking at the DI head and the twin scroll turbo manifold setup , its the A20NFT (LHU)
It's different I'm afraid. The Saab manifold (B207) has the TB located on top, whereas the later DI engines have the TB on the underside of the manifold. Not sure on relative TB sizes.
The bolt pattern for connection to the head is also different, so it won't bolt straight on without an adaptor plate (which I seen someone in the US has done).
#373
Posted 03 September 2014 - 08:05 PM
#374
Posted 03 September 2014 - 08:08 PM
#376
Posted 04 September 2014 - 09:11 AM
#378
Posted 04 September 2014 - 09:29 AM
unless the rotors are at something mad like 200degC (guess) then I really doubt there would be much transfer to the air.... ok it could soak the manifold and then soak the cooler water circuit but thats a little tenuous imho.
Its simple fizzicks of pushing more air than is needed into the manifold/engine
#379
Posted 04 September 2014 - 10:02 AM
It's going to do F all.
You will heat air that you compress. It's dictated by physics. You can reduce this effect by making the process more efficient, but without moving to a different rotor design then you are stuck with a fixed efficiency.
#380
Posted 04 September 2014 - 10:18 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users