Given the shitty rear biased weight distribution, unless of course you want old skool 911 dynamics, weight out of the rear is probably better found than weight out of the front.
Project Fracas - 6Sp A20Nft
#241
Posted 09 May 2016 - 10:02 AM
#242
Posted 09 May 2016 - 10:20 AM
weights going out everywhere
a bit here, a bit there. everything adds up. (need to make up for the 100kg in the drivers seat somehow!)
im trying to bias the weight of added bits to the front* where possible, but doesnt mean im not cutting fat wherever it presents itself
*eg, im rebuilding the firewall and the IC barrel will sit essentially behind the seats on top of the fuel tank
#243
Posted 09 May 2016 - 11:49 AM
VX/Speedster fibreglass/clams are quite 'substantial' compared to the S2 Elise jobbies.
Many parts on the VX/Speedster are double-skinned like the engine cover which makes them nice and rigid, but they do weigh quite a bit..
If you don't mind a little flex here and there (and the GRP really doesn't mind ) then you can cut out quite some reinforcement or second skin pieces from the back side of the various bodypanels and fixings of the OEM clams and various panels.
Bye, Arno.
#244
Posted 09 May 2016 - 01:40 PM
#245
Posted 09 May 2016 - 03:47 PM
#246
Posted 09 May 2016 - 06:11 PM
#247
Posted 09 May 2016 - 06:44 PM
no i hadnt. i have seen GMS's version of the same thing though.
€500 for a single piece from a mould is a bit rich for my blood though
Edited by ed.oates, 09 May 2016 - 06:44 PM.
#248
Posted 09 May 2016 - 10:01 PM
Well, they do, and the bearing sits perfectly, and the sleeve clearance is just fine
#249
Posted 09 May 2016 - 11:13 PM
Also had an unexpectedly badly smashed radiator support box. Didn't look that bad initially, but it was cracked badly in multiple spots, had lots of ripped out holes, and was quite bent/skew. I decided to ditch the wings in favour of splitter support rods, so they went too.
#250
Posted 10 May 2016 - 09:32 AM
#251
Posted 10 May 2016 - 11:09 AM
Looks quite compact.
#252
Posted 10 May 2016 - 11:16 AM
What lump is that again?
#253
Posted 10 May 2016 - 11:45 AM
Edited by CHILL Gone DUTCH, 10 May 2016 - 11:45 AM.
#254
Posted 10 May 2016 - 12:00 PM
Same family. A20NFT
#255
Posted 10 May 2016 - 12:04 PM
What lump is that again?
Its a modernised 2.2 NA engine with a turbo and lots of nice features, essentially. Hence its a bolt in job (more or less)
And 310hp is pessimistic...
#257
Posted 10 May 2016 - 12:25 PM
#258
Posted 10 May 2016 - 02:53 PM
Maybe it looks quite similar, but:
- DI
- VVT
- no sleeves, better heat transfer
- under piston oil cooling
- forged crank and rods
- stainless twin scroll turbo
- dry-sump like behaviour - brilliant oilpan (drove it with 2,4g on the track this weekend - without any issues)
- ethanol compatible
Not only does it have more power and is lighter than a Z22SE - the car even brakes better due to the cam driven vaccum pump for the brake booster.
A totally stock A20NFT has more torque at 1000 RPM (270 Nm) than a Z20LET ever had (250 Nm).
Or in other words: The whole torque curve of the Z20LET is below the Idle torque of A20NFT
And a totally stock A20NFT revs better, quicker and more direct than any tuned Z22SE due to the sophisticated control unit and variable valve timing.
Here's how it sounds like:
Edited by BadCop, 10 May 2016 - 02:54 PM.
#259
Posted 10 May 2016 - 03:10 PM
#260
Posted 11 May 2016 - 09:06 AM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users