@ badcop; any price indication of a Delphi E39A ecu with your stand-alone software?
and you run this now with the stock (K04?) turbo, or an uprated one?
Edited by Exmantaa, 17 May 2016 - 02:07 PM.
Posted 17 May 2016 - 02:06 PM
@ badcop; any price indication of a Delphi E39A ecu with your stand-alone software?
and you run this now with the stock (K04?) turbo, or an uprated one?
Edited by Exmantaa, 17 May 2016 - 02:07 PM.
Posted 17 May 2016 - 04:48 PM
Don't want to hijack Ed's thread with details of my car
http://www.vx220.org...ndalone-a20nft/
Yes still the stock turbo - twin scroll Stainless K04 - really nice quick spool.
Posted 17 May 2016 - 05:33 PM
Posted 18 May 2016 - 06:24 AM
Posted 18 May 2016 - 06:26 AM
and an overview of 'progress' at the end of last night
Posted 18 May 2016 - 08:57 AM
*facepalm*
Posted 18 May 2016 - 09:47 AM
Didn't know you'd been scavenging things from the bottom of the sea.
Posted 18 May 2016 - 11:31 AM
Looks like you are making good progress, but that bearing is going to need some oil to ease it up again
I think a lot of us are watching your progress with the engine and gearbox install very closely. My car is sitting with an empty engine bay at the moment, with a Z20LET that needs a rebuild/refresh before re-installing and no gearbox.
PS. Is that a turbo you are using as a donor vehicle? If you are looking to sell on some of the engine bits to fund your build bear me in mind. I need to source an ECU, engine loom and a few other bits and pieces to get my engine running again.
Posted 18 May 2016 - 03:43 PM
Edited by ed.oates, 18 May 2016 - 03:45 PM.
Posted 21 May 2016 - 10:41 AM
Posted 22 May 2016 - 05:05 AM
Posted 22 May 2016 - 11:54 AM
Good to see steady progress.
Posted 25 May 2016 - 10:21 PM
Posted 25 May 2016 - 11:01 PM
Had a similar thing done at MBR the other week to gain extra camber
Posted 27 May 2016 - 04:14 PM
been stewing on the best compromise, setting up the W2A lines.
so far ive got the following bits:
PWR 6" barrel with 19mm fittings
PWR heat exchanger (only about 35x300x350mm) with 19mm fittings
EWP115 nylon pump with 38mm fittings
I figure a lot of the circuit resistance comes from the long runs front-to-back, so maximising flow here seems to be worth the effort (and theres space for good chunks of pipe), and after doing the maths and seeing whats available in terms of off -the-shelf tubing, I think ive settled on the following:
- lightweight 32x1.6mm HDPE pipe for the long runs front to back, including formed hardpipe radius bends, and proper diameter transitions. so basically that's a 29mm ID for 50-75% of the circuit length in smooth-walled, constant-diameter hardpipe, which doesn't weigh that much.
whats im a bit undecided on is whether to step down to 19mm ID from the 29 hard pipe (as that's the size of the core and exchanger fittings, and would be simpler) or wether I should bite the inconvenience and step down to a bigger 25mm hose, with a simple 25-19 reducer immediately at the fittings.
Either way the 32mm HDPE pipe is a fixed variable.
Im tempted to try the 19mm ID hose, and just get good hose to avoid diameter loss around bends etc. if its not good enough, ive got both the exchanger core size which could be an issue, plus I can upgrade the 19 to 25mm hose if required.
the 19mm is certainly easier to handle
Posted 29 May 2016 - 08:30 AM
Posted 29 May 2016 - 02:09 PM
I used to use 10.9 HCBs too but had one snap on me (possibly due to a bad pothole, but it's hard to be sure). I now use 12.9 bolts and really torque them up (to about 50 or 60 ft/lb) and they have been fine for at least 3 years (with very wide tyres and lots of torque), hence I'd recommend them in a car that will likely see some abuse.
Edited by Nev, 29 May 2016 - 02:11 PM.
Posted 30 May 2016 - 02:52 PM
bolts arent simple things
basically, high tensile bolts do what the name would suggest - they can withstand higher tensile loads before stretch, or deformity + failure. this allows a higher tensile bolt to be tourqued higher, increasing the clamping force between the two things being bolted. this reduces slip movement and lift between the assembled parts, which could lead to failure of the assembly (the perfect example is high tensile bolts, made from ARP unobtainium, for head bolts + studs, and conrods etc).
Im not sold on the need to put super high tensile bolts in the hub carriers. do they really need to be torqued up so hard? is the problem that the hub isnt held in the upright, and increasing the clamping load of the hub fixes something?
bolts snapping often has nothing to do with the tensile strength of the bolt, per se, rather they almost always fail at the junction of the thread and bolt shoulder (as most normal bolts have cut threads = grain structure interrupted). if you wanted to guard against bolt snappage, best to use fasteners with rolled thread. bolts with a cut thread, if shock loaded hard enough, will fail regardless of tensile strength.
Posted 30 May 2016 - 03:32 PM
lol, i just googled this topic. much paranoia and misinformation within lotus circles about bolts. 12.9 bolts are brittle and will explode? the bolts are in shear? really? ok...
the only rational argument against 12.9 is a- overkill, and b- corrosion
Edited by ed.oates, 30 May 2016 - 03:35 PM.
Posted 30 May 2016 - 04:48 PM
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users