Vocky's implication is the failure is peak hp related, and has labeled the pistons 350hp limited.Agreed, but you don't know if the engine failed at peak output. It's certainly looks like a common lspi failure
Project Fracas - 6Sp A20Nft
#441
Posted 13 August 2016 - 07:31 PM
#442
Posted 13 August 2016 - 08:17 PM
Very strange failure in that case. I would expect thermal fatigue which wouldn't originate from the ring packVocky's implication is the failure is peak hp related, and has labeled the pistons 350hp limited.Agreed, but you don't know if the engine failed at peak output. It's certainly looks like a common lspi failure
#443
Posted 13 August 2016 - 08:33 PM
#444
Posted 14 August 2016 - 08:34 AM
just google LNF piston failure, plenty to keep you busy
#445
Posted 14 August 2016 - 08:44 AM
FYI. There are two engines being used as benchmarks for severe LSPI engines; the Ford 2.0 Ecoboot and the GM LNF. LSPI is considered to be caused by ejection of fuel/oil mixture from the top ring crevice into the combustion chamber and as a result, the pre ignition event tends to occur from above the ring zone leading to failures like those. This has been tested with chamfered edge pistons which show negligible LSPI events in comparison.
I'm certain these failures are caused by LSPI. Failures due to high thermal load don't originate from the ring pack. Running an all magesnium containing oil (no calcium) will help mitigate against LSPI, as will running high EGR and running the engine rich.
#446
Posted 14 August 2016 - 10:25 AM
Could it also be the mapping above 350bhp which makes LSPI more likely ?
#447
Posted 14 August 2016 - 10:34 AM
Could it also be the mapping above 350bhp which makes LSPI more likely ?
In short, yes. If it extends the low RPM, high BMEP region. I suspect there's more temptation to use this area when the car has more power as there's less reason to downshift. Ford have developed a shift algorithm to drop down a gear in their automatic boxes when LSPI is detected, however it's so much more powerful that knock (and earlier, often before TDC) that you can still get significant damage.
Biggest recommendation I can make is to use a Dexos1; 2015 lubricant, they're the only oil on the market with LSPI testing (in the LNF) at the moment. When API SP/GF-6 comes out, that will have another (but milder) LSPI test. Nothing else does and typical oils are very prone to it.
#448
Posted 14 August 2016 - 10:58 AM
#449
Posted 14 August 2016 - 11:51 AM
#450
Posted 14 August 2016 - 12:08 PM
Edited by BadCop, 14 August 2016 - 12:09 PM.
#451
Posted 14 August 2016 - 01:41 PM
So vocky... What you've posted is an LNF piston (A20NHH or similar)? Explains why it looks different to the LDU (A20NFT) pistons I've seen.
Feel free to correct me, but I think the LNF pistons et.al. are just regular cast, and the LDU is a hypereutectic (semi forged) piston. LDU / A20NFT pistons look decidedly different
I have never seen a A20NFT (LHU) Piston fail even over 400 bhp in race condition.
8 out of 10 cars finished 24h Nordschleife with Stock A20NFT engine.
None of those Z22SE or Z20 engines would survive 24h full throttle at 400 bhp - not even with uprated internals
The piston vocky posted is the Opel GT / Insignia LNF engine - which is crap.
And has nothing to do with A20NFT.
It has become quite clear to me that you both have not got a clue
Here is the engine code from the Astra J VXR engine, which the damaged piston came out of, quite clearly an A20NFT
I wil leave your thread alone from now on
#452
Posted 14 August 2016 - 01:54 PM
Edited by BadCop, 14 August 2016 - 01:57 PM.
#453
Posted 14 August 2016 - 03:03 PM
#454
Posted 14 August 2016 - 03:32 PM
#455
Posted 14 August 2016 - 06:52 PM
To be fair, I doubt cars in the 24hr are running around at low rpm/high bmep cruise, pinging their tits off with lspi. It's an interesting conundrum the lspi thing throws into the mix, and even oems are really struggling. Certainly makes things you take for granted on modern pfi engines suddenly seem rather important again. For eg I was in 2 minds how I was going to set up my pcv breather system, but PI makes it a no brainer to port. That, and the 5000km oil change is back. Takes me back to the old days when I'd take my first car (carby with mech ign advance) around the back of the local football field carpark, and pour a bottle of redex straight into the intake to 'de-knock' it. Lol. Pity vocky has deleted his pic of the failure.I have never seen a A20NFT (LHU) Piston fail even over 400 bhp in race condition. 8 out of 10 cars finished 24h Nordschleife with Stock A20NFT engine.
#456
Posted 14 August 2016 - 07:11 PM
#457
Posted 14 August 2016 - 08:46 PM
Haven't seen much indication that LSPI will reduce ODI from any of our, industry testing or oem discussions. Adoption of RDR may stall increasing ODIs thoughTo be fair, I doubt cars in the 24hr are running around at low rpm/high bmep cruise, pinging their tits off with lspi. It's an interesting conundrum the lspi thing throws into the mix, and even oems are really struggling. Certainly makes things you take for granted on modern pfi engines suddenly seem rather important again. For eg I was in 2 minds how I was going to set up my pcv breather system, but PI makes it a no brainer to port. That, and the 5000km oil change is back. Takes me back to the old days when I'd take my first car (carby with mech ign advance) around the back of the local football field carpark, and pour a bottle of redex straight into the intake to 'de-knock' it. Lol. Pity vocky has deleted his pic of the failure.I have never seen a A20NFT (LHU) Piston fail even over 400 bhp in race condition. 8 out of 10 cars finished 24h Nordschleife with Stock A20NFT engine.
Edited by fezzasus, 14 August 2016 - 08:49 PM.
#458
Posted 16 August 2016 - 06:57 PM
Anyway, banged in a few of them between renovating stairs and picking up the kids, and got the surge tank and filter/reg kinda sorted out. It's all pretty tight, so tough getting the hoses flowing nicely. Fortunately the 200 nylon hose turns a pretty nice radius. Also, it seems I need a 45 -6 for the reg output hose. No biggie, and nice to see it'll all more or less line up how I'd imagined.
#459
Posted 17 August 2016 - 07:12 AM
Why not use two 90 degree fittings rather than bend the hose?
#460
Posted 17 August 2016 - 07:32 AM
Should that surge tank/pump not be mounted vertical?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users