
Water Injection
#421
Posted 29 September 2016 - 07:28 PM
#422
Posted 29 September 2016 - 07:32 PM
I will try and get data with it on and off But really need to get this knock sorted first if weather permits I'm sure i will get it reduced then it will be used I don't like leaning on the safety I prefer not to have it to start of withI'm happy with everything below 50*C on track. Now it gets above 80 if pushed on track... :-/
#423
Posted 30 September 2016 - 06:33 AM
#424
Posted 30 September 2016 - 07:10 AM
The reason for the water injection is to reduce the iat Knock was not a issue before Because the burn rate has changed ( slower ) then the ignition of the fuel at the right time has now changed I'm hoping it's just a case of finding the correct point to start the ignition of the cooler mixture, This was no different from what was required when we do are ignition on a no water ignition situationWhy are you getting knock with the extra cooling of the charge? Isn't avoiding knock the whole point of adding WI in the first place? (Not being critical just interested to know what's happening)
#425
Posted 30 September 2016 - 07:31 AM
iirc your map had an extremely good flatline on the knock (ie 0.5 max everywhere)
Where did the knock start appearing? On all rpm's? Big spikes, or just above 1?
#426
Posted 30 September 2016 - 07:38 AM
#427
Posted 30 September 2016 - 07:57 AM
#428
Posted 30 September 2016 - 07:59 AM
Edited by CHILL Gone DUTCH, 30 September 2016 - 08:00 AM.
#429
Posted 30 September 2016 - 08:02 AM
The reason for the water injection is to reduce the iat Knock was not a issue before Because the burn rate has changed ( slower ) then the ignition of the fuel at the right time has now changed I'm hoping it's just a case of finding the correct point to start the ignition of the cooler mixture, This was no different from what was required when we do are ignition on a no water ignition situationWhy are you getting knock with the extra cooling of the charge? Isn't avoiding knock the whole point of adding WI in the first place? (Not being critical just interested to know what's happening)
Why do you need to reduce iat? I assumed it was to stop the ecu retarding the ignition to protect the engine from knock at high iat (and hence reducing power).
#430
Posted 30 September 2016 - 08:02 AM
I'm seeing highs of 5s now smiley Which I'm not comfortable with
Outch, that's bad.
#431
Posted 30 September 2016 - 08:10 AM
#432
Posted 30 September 2016 - 08:18 AM
Here is some data for you smiley
yesterday i managed to reduce the knock between 4500 rpm and 5500 rpm but the higher up rev range the same amount of ignition had very little effect on the knock, but this is where the water rate increases with the fuel injector cycle
and this is only the WOT areas there is still the low load stuff
Edited by CHILL Gone DUTCH, 30 September 2016 - 08:20 AM.
#433
Posted 30 September 2016 - 08:29 AM
Will you be getting an even spread of water in each cylinder injecting at each side?
#434
Posted 30 September 2016 - 08:32 AM
Will you be getting an even spread of water in each cylinder injecting at each side?
in my logs the you can monitor each cylinder for knock and its consistent over all the cylinders so at the moment im going to say yes but i have had this in the back of my mind
and monitoring accordingly
#437
Posted 30 September 2016 - 10:03 AM
#438
Posted 30 September 2016 - 10:06 AM
#439
Posted 30 September 2016 - 12:31 PM
Curious to see where it ends up.
(For the 2.0 engine the optimum ignitioon is somewhere around 24 degrees (on E85...) before it doesn't make any more power, but will check that number)
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users