Jump to content


Photo

Rainsport3 Size And Xl Or Not?


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 james4563

james4563

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 268 posts
  • Location:Southampton

Posted 07 November 2016 - 10:08 AM

Going to replace my AD08R with some rainsport3 for the wetter winter months.

I've been really struggling with the AD08R that were fitted to the car when I bought it, a few really nervy experiences in the damp ( not raining ) even when just driving normally. I do wonder if they have had too many heat cycles and become very hard, as I know the car was tracked before I bought it. I have read that the wet performance really drops after a while. even though the tyres appear to have tons of life left in them.

 

 

Anyway, currently I have 205/50/16 F and 225/45/17 R, are those the best sizes to use? I understand 205 is quite a lot wider than the standard fronts? Also does anyone know if I should get the XL marked ones or not? From what I can tell XL are meant for heavier vehicles? Do they have a stronger sidewall?

 

 

Camskill are doing a set of 4 ( rainsport3) for around £240, the AD08R seem so bad I'm willing to give these a try throughout the winter even if they are horrible in the dry and don't last long.



#2 Tony H

Tony H

    Lotus on Crack

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,729 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Medway
  • Interests:Serbian turbo-folk

Posted 07 November 2016 - 11:57 AM

Sidewalls are extremely soft on rainsport, might not be very nice in the dry. Id get the heavy ones.

#3 fiveoclock

fiveoclock

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,453 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ifold, West Sussex

Posted 07 November 2016 - 05:31 PM

Sidewalls are extremely soft on rainsport, might not be very nice in the dry. Id get the heavy ones.

Rainsport 3s are bought for their wet grip capability. One of the features of the tyre and part of the reason they offer such good wet grip are the soft sidewalls. Why would you go against the advice of the manufacturer and fit a tyre not designed for your vehicle which will affect the main benefit of the tyre? As has been said before I use them as a wet race tyre and find the handling in the wet brilliant. I have also used them in the dry on the vx and on Panda 100HP which is similar weight and had no problems with them having softer side walls. 



#4 anz3001

anz3001

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,617 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Leicester

Posted 07 November 2016 - 06:47 PM

Do they have a stronger sidewall?

 

 

 

Nope



#5 james4563

james4563

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 268 posts
  • Location:Southampton

Posted 08 November 2016 - 02:46 PM

Can I run 205/45/16 ( got 205/50 atm ) on the front without the ABS messing up? 225/45/17 at the rear.

 

205/45/16 opens up a few more options such as Eagle F1s Aysm 2 and Michelin Pilot Sport 3

 

 

 



#6 Gopherit

Gopherit

    Member

  • Pip
  • 76 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:East Clandon

Posted 10 November 2016 - 12:16 PM

I've got a set of Rainsport 3s in the XL version. I bought them for use as an everyday road tyre, particularly in the winter and for use on wet trackdays. Before I bought I tried to do a bit of research on the "XL or Standard" version and I read the extremely helpful notes from 5 o'clock and Zoobeef on this forum on wet track experiences. I also found other views that were quite off-putting about lack of straight line stability, loads of understeer etc.

 

I also spoke to a VERY helpful chap in Uniroyal UK called Gwyn Fennell (telephone number if you pm me) who explained about the tyres construction and the difference in XL/Std.

 

Having tried to digest this I finally went for the XL's - cost more than the bandied about figure of £250 once fitted/balanced - more like £310 (205/45 R16 XL and 225/45 R17 XL) but I wanted them fitted by the chap I always use in Guildford 'cos he knows me and takes care.

 

I was only able to put about 70 road miles on before tracking them and naturally it was dry - which I was quite happy with as I wanted to heat cycle them before actually using in the wet. I put them on after a morning's worth of dry tyres and went out expecting possible horrible feel. I was in fact pleasantly surprised. A 20 minute session and took it carefully for about 4 laps, then ramped it up a bit and then cooled down for about 2 laps.

 

Yes they are "squidgy" (very technical!) but no problems at all with straight line stability or braking from high speed. In the corners they were slightly delayed on turn in and then seemed to bite - not what I would call understeer initially although that was there, accentuated on tight corners and lock to lock in the chicane was understeering, but not so's you'd worry about it.

 

Overall very pleasing but of course I have yet to try them in the wet! I am expecting them to be better than my AD08s which have had some ok outings in the wet but recently feel as though they've gone off (or maybe it's the driver).

I'm running 0.6deg negative on the front, Quantums, HR rack and 2.5x A/R bar. I ran the Rainsports at 26/27.5, seemed a good starting point.

 

Here's the note on Rainsports I have in the file:

The "XL" (extra load) tire can be ordered for a vehicle that had a standard load tire as its Original Equipment. This is accomplished in the manufacturing process by adding additional material to the shoulder of a tire for extra strength. These reinforcements (usually accomplished with polyamide belting found where the sidewall and tread meet) are designed to minimize any tire deflection and reduce potential damage due to road impact. These strong tires will be branded with an "XL" or "RF" in their descriptions. Will the XL tire have an effect on my comfort? "The "XL" tire will change the perception and feel of the vehicle. Tires that are engineered with reinforced sidewalls typically fall into the performance tire category. These tires have a rubber compound formulated to accentuate performance but not necessarily detract from the ride quality.  A driver should consider XL tire options when plus sizing any wheel packages or if more feedback from the tire is desired. Drivers seeking a firmer ride and enhanced car control would not need to be concerned with the XL warning when comparing different tires to match their driving expectations. As a matter of fact, this type tire will enhance the overall vehicle stability and handling. Also, the selection of a more aggressive tread compound will increase grip in the wet and dry. For drivers desiring a softer feel and are willing to forgo the car’s stability in cornering, the standard load tire will be a more appropriate choice."

 

 I've also linked to the brochure which explains the weird look you get with the asymmetric tread running backwards on 1 side. Can be worrying if you're not expecting it!

https://drive.google...iew?usp=sharing

I am sure 5 O'clock is correct and the std tyre would out-perform the XL under racing conditions but I hope the XL will allow the typical transition wet/damp/dry to be more enjoyable and on the road I don't really worry.

 



#7 james4563

james4563

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 268 posts
  • Location:Southampton

Posted 10 November 2016 - 01:54 PM

Thank you very much for that info Gopherit!

 

Unfortnatley I'm due to have a set of Eagle F1 Aysm 2 fitted tomorrow.

205/45/16 F

225/45/17 R

 

£340 fitted.

 

I hope I've not made the wrong choice! Given the information you posted above I probably would have gone with the RainSport3, but I placed the Eagle F1 order on Tuesday :(



#8 Rosssco

Rosssco

    Scary Internerd

  • 4,183 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Aberdeen

Posted 10 November 2016 - 04:00 PM

Eagle F1 Asym 2's are a very good road tyre also. I'm sure you won't be disappointed.



#9 anz3001

anz3001

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,617 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Leicester

Posted 10 November 2016 - 04:26 PM

Has anyone ever considered why almost all 225/45X17 tyres on the market are a 91 or 94(XL) load rating....and yet when Lotus/Bridgestone went to the trouble of produced the vx specific tyre they went for a 90 load rating?

 

XL tyres are designed to run at higher pressures, that is the difference between a standard and xl tyre, the pressure they can take NOTHING to do with sidewall stiffness. After all, it's the air inside the tyre that takes the weight/load of a car.

 

Do you think they work optimally well when you stick your 22-24psi in them? 

 

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users