Edited by 1cobrav8, 13 January 2018 - 10:13 AM.

2Nd Time Round! - Twincharge
#1
Posted 13 January 2018 - 10:09 AM
#2
Posted 13 January 2018 - 10:23 AM
Sounds interesting.....should be a doddle after the last one
#3
Posted 13 January 2018 - 10:25 AM

#4
Posted 13 January 2018 - 11:54 AM
Welcome back, they are irritatingly difficult to get rid off entirely. Though it does sound a lot of repitition work to get it as nice as the last one you sold?!?
#5
Posted 13 January 2018 - 12:38 PM
For twincharging with a turbo, that Harrop will be a bit of a waste... You can perfecty use the M62 to fill the low end and then turbo all the way to 500++
It's done before on US LSJ engines.
(Ow, and an LS4 TB can be a bit twitchy. On an M62 charger I would not go bigger than the original 68mm version.)
#7
Posted 13 January 2018 - 01:07 PM
don't do the coupe back. doesn't look right.
#8
Posted 13 January 2018 - 05:12 PM
The crazy guy is back
#9
Posted 13 January 2018 - 05:26 PM
#10
Posted 13 January 2018 - 06:05 PM
Depends on the coupe back. The German one with the slats is cool. Good luck with this mental build! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalkdon't do the coupe back. doesn't look right.
#11
Posted 13 January 2018 - 07:00 PM
What you should try to do is to fit a clutch to the S/C so you can gear it to it's max rpm right after the turbo kicks in and then de-clutch. This would make proper use of the S/C with reduced internal leak at low rpm and use of its full potential and low parasitic losses when the turbo kicks in. On top of that the turbo should spool earlier and the torque curve will be more even in the transition.
#12
Posted 13 January 2018 - 07:09 PM
What you should try to do is to fit a clutch to the S/C so you can gear it to it's max rpm right after the turbo kicks in and then de-clutch. This would make proper use of the S/C with reduced internal leak at low rpm and use of its full potential and low parasitic losses when the turbo kicks in. On top of that the turbo should spool earlier and the torque curve will be more even in the transition.
or the electric volvo/audi forced induction
expect 48 volt systems in cars to be standard soon
#13
Posted 13 January 2018 - 07:36 PM
#14
Posted 13 January 2018 - 07:42 PM
#15
Posted 13 January 2018 - 07:48 PM
#16
Posted 13 January 2018 - 07:52 PM
I'm surprised thet don't use the air compressor cylinder Volvo use in some of there diesel designs
The problem with powerpulse is that it's limited in how many times it can be used in a certain timeframe (tank size/compressor), ie it would be useless in a trackcar.
#17
Posted 13 January 2018 - 07:56 PM
I've also wondered why no body has developed a none combustion air pump engine which is 2 stroke and purely works on compressed air rather than combustion of fuel
Don't remember which but one oem did a KERS system based on compressed air instead of regenerating braking to charging batteries.
#18
Posted 13 January 2018 - 08:13 PM
What you should try to do is to fit a clutch to the S/C so you can gear it to it's max rpm right after the turbo kicks in and then de-clutch. This would make proper use of the S/C with reduced internal leak at low rpm and use of its full potential and low parasitic losses when the turbo kicks in. On top of that the turbo should spool earlier and the torque curve will be more even in the transition.
or the electric volvo/audi forced induction
expect 48 volt systems in cars to be standard soon
It sure will, it's forced in by new emission legislations and high tax for CO2.
#19
Posted 14 January 2018 - 11:31 AM
#20
Posted 18 January 2018 - 07:56 PM
Ha ha, I thought you wern't going to go mad on this car?!
GL with twin charging, looking fwd to seeing how you set it up.
Did you not of just using a twin scroll turbo instead of the Garret - probably loads of torque by 3500 RPM I would imagine, if you extend the RPM range to say 8000 that gives you a viable 4000 RPM gear change range which is plenty (way more than more street cars anyway).
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users