...... Lobbing Cheese ...........it makes a plesant change to find him doing that rather than "reading" MaxPower in the toilet

Hitec Tuning Kit Supercharged
#261
Posted 16 March 2005 - 01:00 PM
#262
Posted 16 March 2005 - 01:11 PM
Stage 1 increases the power to 210-215 BHP on a standard car with a standard exhaust. The cost is £4750 fitted including vat.
Stage 2 increases the power to 240+ BHP and consists of higher flow injectors and smaller diameter alloy supercharger pulley and a different map. The cost for this is £5175 including vat and fitting.
Hmmmm... *strokes chin* I was planning on buying a house next year, I wonder if I could live in a superhcarged VX?

#263
Posted 16 March 2005 - 01:13 PM
No, but you could live in a tent. I here there is a sale on in the local camping shop.Stage 1 increases the power to 210-215 BHP on a standard car with a standard exhaust. The cost is £4750 fitted including vat.
Stage 2 increases the power to 240+ BHP and consists of higher flow injectors and smaller diameter alloy supercharger pulley and a different map. The cost for this is £5175 including vat and fitting.
Hmmmm... *strokes chin* I was planning on buying a house next year, I wonder if I could live in a superhcarged VX?![]()

#264
Posted 16 March 2005 - 01:22 PM
Free tent* with every Supercharger Conversion.No, but you could live in a tent. I here there is a sale on in the local camping shop.


* Of our choosing. Please refer to terms and conditions. The management's decision is final.

#265
Posted 17 March 2005 - 10:18 AM
I bet you make that offer to all the girls you meet on Friday & Saturday evenings don't you Mark?Free tent*
Edited by cheese-lobber, 17 March 2005 - 10:19 AM.
#266
Posted 17 March 2005 - 11:41 AM


#267
Posted 17 March 2005 - 01:20 PM
Alot of this torque improvement has come from getting rid of the plastic inlet manifold, you can see on the old conversion graph that even with the superchager you get that "2.2" torque bump. However the new conversion has a new alloy inlet manifold with integral charge cooler, which has removed it.
Just out of interest, why do you need a charge cooler on an SC engine?; i was under the impression that you need one on a turbo because of the proximity of the exhaust to the inlet which heats the incoming air, but with an SC its just as normal?
I'm guessing its because the air gets compressed as it gets sucked in by the SC, but how much does it increase temp by?
And another thing

Sorry for all the questions, but i'm feeling quizical, today

Cheers, Paul.
#268
Posted 17 March 2005 - 05:16 PM
Hi Paul,Alot of this torque improvement has come from getting rid of the plastic inlet manifold, you can see on the old conversion graph that even with the superchager you get that "2.2" torque bump. However the new conversion has a new alloy inlet manifold with integral charge cooler, which has removed it.
Just out of interest, why do you need a charge cooler on an SC engine?; i was under the impression that you need one on a turbo because of the proximity of the exhaust to the inlet which heats the incoming air, but with an SC its just as normal?
I'm guessing its because the air gets compressed as it gets sucked in by the SC, but how much does it increase temp by?
And another thingthose big turbo ears on the VXT, how come you don't need them on the SC conversion?
Sorry for all the questions, but i'm feeling quizical, today![]()
Cheers, Paul.
a charge cooler is not vital on a S/C engine however when you compress air, that in its self generates heat. On the old super charger conversion we could see inlet air temps, climbing under hard use to 60 degrees. At this time nothing over 30 degrees has been seen on the dyno.
We do not need the big ears, as the supercharger does not generate the same heat that a turbo will, it actually gets no hotter than your cam cover.

#269
Posted 17 March 2005 - 10:47 PM
Hi Paul,
a charge cooler is not vital on a S/C engine however when you compress air, that in its self generates heat. On the old super charger conversion we could see inlet air temps, climbing under hard use to 60 degrees. At this time nothing over 30 degrees has been seen on the dyno.
Awesome, getting more and more tempted by this day by day...

We do not need the big ears, as the supercharger does not generate the same heat that a turbo will, it actually gets no hotter than your cam cover
Ah, so the ears were for cooling

Cheers, Paul.
#270
Posted 17 March 2005 - 10:54 PM
#271
Posted 18 March 2005 - 12:27 AM
i've tried this method, it dont workshut-up, shut-up, I can't hear you...la laaa lelalaaa la lala laaaa

even when i buy lunch i hear " just think!! all this money wasted on such things as food and water!! when you can have a supercharger!!!!!!!"
i feel so ashamed

#272
Posted 18 March 2005 - 04:36 AM
We have run the engine with and without the cooler, because of the medium boost we can get to air temps of close to 100 °C. The cooler reduces that to a level of 30°C or less. It results in a difference of 25Nm or 20Kw (30 bHP) more power. We had checked both situations on the dyno.Hi Paul,Alot of this torque improvement has come from getting rid of the plastic inlet manifold, you can see on the old conversion graph that even with the superchager you get that "2.2" torque bump. However the new conversion has a new alloy inlet manifold with integral charge cooler, which has removed it.
Just out of interest, why do you need a charge cooler on an SC engine?; i was under the impression that you need one on a turbo because of the proximity of the exhaust to the inlet which heats the incoming air, but with an SC its just as normal?
I'm guessing its because the air gets compressed as it gets sucked in by the SC, but how much does it increase temp by?
And another thingthose big turbo ears on the VXT, how come you don't need them on the SC conversion?
Sorry for all the questions, but i'm feeling quizical, today![]()
Cheers, Paul.
a charge cooler is not vital on a S/C engine however when you compress air, that in its self generates heat. On the old super charger conversion we could see inlet air temps, climbing under hard use to 60 degrees. At this time nothing over 30 degrees has been seen on the dyno.
We do not need the big ears, as the supercharger does not generate the same heat that a turbo will, it actually gets no hotter than your cam cover.![]()
#2177
#273
Posted 18 March 2005 - 10:23 AM
Food is for wimps!!!i've tried this method, it dont workshut-up, shut-up, I can't hear you...la laaa lelalaaa la lala laaaa
i am now hearing this everyday in my head!!
even when i buy lunch i hear " just think!! all this money wasted on such things as food and water!! when you can have a supercharger!!!!!!!"
i feel so ashamed


[Homer Simpson]Mmmmm Supercharger....... [/Homer Simpson]
#274
Posted 18 March 2005 - 06:20 PM
#275
Posted 18 March 2005 - 06:31 PM
You'd still need a front pipe (pre-cat removed and sports cat) and the combination of the front pipe and the VSE will be very LOUD and with the VSE may not generate the power. Milltek probably the way to go.Jon, will the stage 2 work with the VSE?
#276
Posted 19 March 2005 - 07:31 PM

#277
Posted 19 March 2005 - 10:29 PM

#278
Posted 20 March 2005 - 05:26 AM
I have made a "Kompressor" logo for it, but you can order your own logo. HITEC just makes a couple of small red HITEC stickers on it!#2177, do you have an SC logo on the back of your car now, like the "turbo" on the VXT? I remember reading something about a logo in that report you wrote...
![]()
Cheers, Paul.
#2177
Attached Files
Edited by rubber, 20 March 2005 - 07:49 AM.
#279
Posted 20 March 2005 - 07:28 AM
I'm sorry, but that's really nasty!I have made a "Kompressor" logo for it, but you can order your own logo.
#280
Posted 20 March 2005 - 10:00 AM
I have made a "Kompressor" logo for it, but you can order your own logo. HITEC just makes a couple of small red HITEC stickers on it!
Cool - I was thinking of just getting SC in the same font as VX220 just underneath it...

Now all I need is a few thousand £!

Cheers, Paul.
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users