
Hitec Tuning Kit Supercharged
#141
Posted 26 January 2005 - 01:55 PM
#142
Posted 26 January 2005 - 03:48 PM
Hi all, had a great time over at Hitec with Hartmut and Alfred. The stage 2 is taking a little more work as it has become apparent that whist the OE front pipe including cats was fine at 215 bhp, the standard main cat (the precat has since been removed) becomes a restriction over 230bhp as does the standard airbox. This will not be a problem in the UK as we don’t have any issues with using a 200CPI cat. In Germany things are different. For their market they are looking to an alternative cat solution. Something like a high flow 300.What you can see is that the chipped turbos have a higher torque, while the drivability of the sc is better as a result of the smooth curve. The power distribution is closer to that one of 3.5L NA. ANother important thing is that the torques does not drop of at 6000 revs, but is limited by the rev limiter in the 5th gear, in lower gears you can keeo the torque up to 6500. Without the rev limit even higher... Easy riding. I am eager to hear about Jon´s impressions.
#2177
The graph Alex has posted was done on Monday just after I had been out in the car. The final figures will be ready at the end of the week.
What does the car go like?
Well this morning I plotted this torque curve over the delta supercharger torque curve. The 2.2 torque dip at around 3000 rpm which was still evident in the delta kit (as it was still on the OE plastic manifold) has completely gone.
At 3000 rpm the delta car has 173.3 lb ft (235Nm) Alex's car has 217 lbs ft (295 Nm) that’s a 43.7 lbs ft (59.3Nm) increase.

At 2000 rpm delta have 147.5 (200Nm). Alex's car has 194 lbs ft (264Nm) an increase 46.5 (63.1Nm)

This also compares very favourably to the VXT's 184 lbft (250 Nm) at 1950 !

This trend continues right across the rev range, which is why it pulls so hard.
Further more, for me a very important aspect is its road manners around town etc. This is what will make or break a conversion for any owner once the honeymoon period of the power is over. The car drives like standard at slow & cruise speeds, by this I mean cleanly without hesitation. 1000 rpm 3rd gear it pulls smoothly no jerking; it is very quick to give full boost and pulls VERY hard right through the rev range to 6500. The posted graph shows 174.6 kilo watt (238.1 bhp) at 6210. You can see that Alfred has just lifted off at this point and that the power has not yet peaked and started to drop! In short it is fantastic and combined with the 2.2 shorter ratio gearbox its punch is nothing short of tremendous.
.
Alex you will simply love it.

The parts for my car are on the way.


#143
Posted 26 January 2005 - 05:50 PM
If I was in the UK, I'd be next in the order book! Those numbers are hardcore automobile pornographyThe parts for my car are on the way.
I cannot wait.




I thought the Delta-Motor SC drove like a meaty 3+litre N/A – the Hitec one sounds more like 5litres *swoon*
Precat is an absolute requirement in Switz. too (of course

Alex, bring it to our Hockenheim event! See my signature below

#144
Posted 26 January 2005 - 07:33 PM
#145
Posted 26 January 2005 - 09:28 PM
What is the mpg?
You mean gpm?

#146
Posted 26 January 2005 - 09:40 PM

#147
Posted 26 January 2005 - 10:04 PM

#148
Posted 27 January 2005 - 08:08 AM
#149
Posted 27 January 2005 - 08:32 AM


#150
Posted 27 January 2005 - 09:21 AM

#151
Posted 27 January 2005 - 01:01 PM


#152
Posted 27 January 2005 - 02:26 PM

#153
Posted 27 January 2005 - 05:31 PM
#154
Posted 27 January 2005 - 05:34 PM
With belt failure, other than loss of drive to the SC and subsequent power loss, would there be any problems – nothing would be wrecked would it? Would the car be able to limp home or would it be "dead"?The SC is lubricated by its own oil reservoir. Belt durability was considered during development. At the start of the project a gates belt was used whilst a belt with superior load characteristics was sourced. This was installed on Monday whilst Jon was there and it was interesting to note that the gates belt had already started to glaze. Regarding durability it is suggested to check the belt as part of the servicing routine at each service and replace when required.
#155
Posted 27 January 2005 - 06:58 PM







#156
Posted 27 January 2005 - 09:13 PM
The car would be in perfect condition unless you request more than 150BHP from it, so as along as you would not go on full throttle, no real issue.With belt failure, other than loss of drive to the SC and subsequent power loss, would there be any problems – nothing would be wrecked would it? Would the car be able to limp home or would it be "dead"?The SC is lubricated by its own oil reservoir. Belt durability was considered during development. At the start of the project a gates belt was used whilst a belt with superior load characteristics was sourced. This was installed on Monday whilst Jon was there and it was interesting to note that the gates belt had already started to glaze. Regarding durability it is suggested to check the belt as part of the servicing routine at each service and replace when required.
#2177
#157
Posted 27 January 2005 - 10:53 PM
GreatThe car would be in perfect condition unless you request more than 150BHP from it, so as along as you would not go on full throttle, no real issue.

I thought having a (out of action) SC on the inlet side might mess up the breathing.
Sounds heavenly!

#158
Posted 28 January 2005 - 12:07 AM


#159
Posted 28 January 2005 - 08:01 AM
#160
Posted 28 January 2005 - 09:21 AM


3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users