I'd have to agree with that. Its much easier for the unemployed and won't work bunch to have kids than those in work. We're not breeding a good society if the majority of our next generation is brought up by doleys.
Unfortunately the proof is out there, despite what the Rowntree Foundation say. The kids that enter my classroom are worse than the previous year, every year (on average, as there are exceptions). I seem to remember a discussion with an Ofsted Inspector for FE the other week 'agreeing wholeheartedly' when I said that the kids entering FE each year are more 'damaged' than their predecessors.
I don't agree with retrospectively cutting back social support, but do feel that new claimants should find it harder. As a sideline, Mel has been out of 'permanent' work for the last 2yrs following her completing a 3yr teaching degree. She has taken all and any work she can get her hands on... yet throughout the whole period we have been eligible for zero support. Prior to Uni she over payed her NIC when both self-employed and as a Teaching Assisstant. We have also been advised that we would not be eligible for state maternity pay. So our child, if we were to have one would suffer tighter financial effects than in a jobless family, with free housing, reduced council tax and financial support on top.