8094 replies to this topic

[easy]

The rules are clear....

No genitals male for female alowed 

If you want to start a "hunky fireman" or "well built pilots" thread then you are sad but able to do so 

I recall there was a pic of a naked woman on one of the threads a couple of weeks ago. Think it was posted about 8am and took a few hours to be deleted. Had that been a naked man, the whole thread probably would have been deleted in mins.

You gotta admit, its double standards.

No it's not.

Do you want help picking up the toys???

I know your right.

I'm just too soft to admit it

Oh, and if seeing as we all know 'the rules' can you not possibly add one to the effect of:

No 'turn a blind eye' treatment to the Female forum members?

Well I'm pleased we agree at last

[ElizP987]

Your so not funny

[Mackem]

Stupid/smug messages on the spare wheel covers of off-roaders. Saw one this morning on an L-reg Discovery with the legend "My Other Toy Has T1ts!" on it. Now what exactly am I supposed to make of that? He is a misogynist? He has a girlfriend/wife? He has a blow up doll? He is a tw@t?

[JimH]

I recall there was a pic of a naked woman on one of the threads a couple of weeks ago. Think it was posted about 8am and took a few hours to be deleted. Had that been a naked man, the whole thread probably would have been deleted in mins.

What are you suggesting? That the mods left the bare lady picture for a few hours before deleting it so it could be "used" by the males on the forum? Surely if there were double standards then pictures of bare ladies would be left for alway. I recall being the one that deleted two bare lady pictures which had been posted in the middle of the bloody night. What would you like, a 24 hour watch?

Perhaps we ought to have a new rule. All bare lady and bare man pictures should be deleted within 5 minutes. If this is breached then a moderator could be taken out and shot in the back of the head as an example to everyone else.

[ajussi]

you're being all pissy and over the top now. taken out back and beaten with a leather cosh would suffice. drama queen.

[JimH]

While I'm in moaning mood. p*ss poor page filling internet security stories on the BBC. Security experts are concerned that Valentines day will bring a spate of rogue emails to tempt people to dating websites where they will try to get credit card and personal details. Is that the best you can do? Why don't you just have a headline, "One Born Every Minute"? If some twat is so thick that they think (i) someone somewhere finds them remotely attractive and (ii) if they were then it would require your credit card details to get their message then frankly I'm glad someone is going to steal your money. You're far too stupid to do anything sensible with it so the world is better off with you poor. And don't even start about when they put Microsoft releases new bit of software on the ticker. The BBC giving free adverting to some of the biggest corporations in the world with your money.

[LazyDonkey]

If some twat is so thick that they think (i) someone somewhere finds them remotely attractive and (ii) if they were then it would require your credit card details to get their message then frankly I'm glad someone is going to steal your money. You're far too stupid to do anything sensible with it so the world is better off with you poor.

But its a nanny state. These people NEED protection from the bad men. Being stupid is a defence, and companies shouldn't be allowed to prey on these unfortunate individuals.

I refer you to every issue of the "The Judge" in the Sunday Mail

ie. I signed up for this great car, didn't look at the APR, assumed they were descent cos they advertise on Living TV. Paid £600 a month for 4 years and was shocked to find i STILL OWED MONEY.

[Ash]

If some twat is so thick that they think (i) someone somewhere finds them remotely attractive and (ii) if they were then it would require your credit card details to get their message then frankly I'm glad someone is going to steal your money. You're far too stupid to do anything sensible with it so the world is better off with you poor.

But its a nanny state. These people NEED protection from the bad men. Being stupid is a defence, and companies shouldn't be allowed to prey on these unfortunate individuals.

I refer you to every issue of the "The Judge" in the Sunday Mail

ie. I signed up for this great car, didn't look at the APR, assumed they were descent cos they advertise on Living TV. Paid £600 a month for 4 years and was shocked to find i STILL OWED MONEY.

Wise words LD, couldn't agree more.

Ash

[VX_beastie]

ie. I signed up for this great car, didn't look at the APR, assumed they were descent cos they advertise on Living TV. Paid £600 a month for 4 years and was shocked to find i STILL OWED MONEY.

Hear hear !!!

It's amazing isn't it... you pay 100 payments of £100 for a £30k car..... is that okay mr customer? Yeah that's great cos then i get a 30k car for 10k... this garage is great....


MORONS!!!!!!!!!

sorry, i work in finance

[ElizP987]

What are you suggesting? That the mods left the bare lady picture for a few hours before deleting it so it could be "used" by the males on the forum? Surely if there were double standards then pictures of bare ladies would be left for alway. I recall being the one that deleted two bare lady pictures which had been posted in the middle of the bloody night. What would you like, a 24 hour watch?

Perhaps we ought to have a new rule. All bare lady and bare man pictures should be deleted within 5 minutes. If this is breached then a moderator could be taken out and shot in the back of the head as an example to everyone else.

I dont meam that at all, all I meant is that the 'rules' seem to be more laxed towards blokes. When its the other way around, your on it straightaway.

You lot get away with things that we dont/would'nt.

You know I didnt mean that at all but you had to go OTT just to try and make a point. Now stop being a miserable old fart

[JimH]

I dont meam that at all, all I meant is that the 'rules' seem to be more laxed towards blokes. When its the other way around, your on it straightaway.

I still don't understand. How can not getting round to delete a picture for a bit be considered a relaxation of the rules?

Also my own personal score is:
Bare ladies deleted - 3
Bare men deleted - 0

[jules_s]

Ive been on hold for 12 mins

[ElizP987]

I still don't understand. How can not getting round to delete a picture for a bit be considered a relaxation of the rules?

Also my own personal score is:
Bare ladies deleted - 3
Bare men deleted - 0

My point on the rules seem to be relaxed towards the blokes go like this:

There was a thread on here asking how men preferred 'tits', which had a poll in it asking how you liked them. Not sure if this has been deleted now, but did have at least 6 or 7 pages on it so went on for a while.

We opened a thread, specifically in response to the threads that some men open on here. Cant remember what the tiltle was called but, it was basically asking how women prefer dicks. Must have had about 2 or 3 replies, and the penis pictures, and the whole thread was deleted, and not just the 2 pics. Now doesnt that say double standards
I'm trying to on or anything but I'm just trying to proove to you the difference.

[ElizP987]

so whats the difference in the post where somebody is talking about picking a girl up in his vx when he was in a pizza shop? I believe they where talking about, does she spit, etc and Its ridiculous. At the end of the day both tits and dicks are private parts so should be treated the same. Whats wrong with talking about soemthing if nothing is shown? Quote: hahaha just got back from the airport, to my surprise u lot have written some funny replies, so to answer a few questions, yes it was faces nightclub, yes her lady area swallowed the lot, and yes i had a few drinks non alcoholic of course haha and no the girlfriend doesnt know..... So, we're not allowed to talk about dicks, but you are allowed to talk about items performed on one and what is done with the contents?! yeah, really makes sense to me... Considering this is genatalia that is being discussed, surely the thread should also be deleted

Edited by ElizP987, 15 February 2006 - 10:06 AM.

[iceman]

I am in the minority here liz but i agree with you totally. It's nothing i haven't said before (or won't say again) but your 'normal' man holds no respect for the opposite sex other than that which will get her into bed with him (sorry to say that chaps, just my rather 'damaged' perception of things, no disrespect intended towards anyone.) Men think with what's between their legs (usually) women think with their hearts (usually) Personally i find (and those 'few' that actually know me, know just exactly why!) the posting of smutty disrespectful remarks and pornographic images offensive. It has upset me often in the past with this forum and i'm sure will do again in the future but there's nothing you liz or i can do to change this (i only wish we could)..we can only find a strength, understanding and acceptance in this sort of behaveour by believing/knowing that 'boys will be boys'. This is a predominantly male inhabited forum and as such will always see these 'boys' being 'boys'. It's a tide that we can't swim against and a battle we can not win. You must accept as i have, that this is the way men are!, it's not big and it's not clever, it just 'is'. Take solise in the knowlidge that we are not all the same and grow/glow in the fact that you are a woman. Bless you all

[ElizP987]

Thanks for your support Icey Pesrsonally the majority of the said threads do not offend me whatsoever . It has all started with me making a post on this thread agreeing with Amanda and adding to the remark of it being double standards for men and women. As somebody went OTT trying to argue their point, I am just trying to make and prove my point. I'm not trying to on or anything at all, or been some kind of Miss Prim and Proper as I have said before, I am not offended in any way whatoever on the various related posts that some men put on here. I find them quite funny actually . I just want to say that we should all be treated equally under the same rule.

Edited by ElizP987, 15 February 2006 - 11:18 AM.

[chuno]

Liz, that thread you are reffering to, i totally agree myself, I thought it was completely out of order and not something we all needed to know about. A couple of times I nearly had had a bit of a at the author, but I decided against it. I really wanted to do this after reading some of his later replies in the thread as well. It just seemed to me that the whole point of the thread was that he wanted to brag that he's 'had loads of women in his vx and he's got this reputation for being a stud etc etc',and seemed intent on giving us all of the details. Not something I particualrly wanted to read

Edited by chuno, 15 February 2006 - 11:17 AM.

[djegiant]

Can we please use a less offensive word than DICKS!

Maybe the mods should open a new SMUT-Enter at your own risk. catergory!



This is something R1CHY has mentioned a few times incidentaly! He would love to see more male nudity! (its a S Wales thing!)