Well I'm pleased we agree at lastI know your right.
No it's not.
I recall there was a pic of a naked woman on one of the threads a couple of weeks ago. Think it was posted about 8am and took a few hours to be deleted. Had that been a naked man, the whole thread probably would have been deleted in mins.The rules are clear....
No genitals male for female alowedÂÂ
If you want to start a "hunky fireman" or "well built pilots" thread then you are sad but able to do soÂÂ
You gotta admit, its double standards.
Do you want help picking up the toys???
I'm just too soft to admit it
Oh, and if seeing as we all know 'the rules' can you not possibly add one to the effect of:
No 'turn a blind eye' treatment to the Female forum members?
What Gets On Your Tits?
#501
Posted 14 February 2006 - 12:14 AM
#502
Posted 14 February 2006 - 12:15 AM
#503
Posted 14 February 2006 - 09:33 AM
#504
Posted 14 February 2006 - 09:50 AM
What are you suggesting? That the mods left the bare lady picture for a few hours before deleting it so it could be "used" by the males on the forum? Surely if there were double standards then pictures of bare ladies would be left for alway. I recall being the one that deleted two bare lady pictures which had been posted in the middle of the bloody night. What would you like, a 24 hour watch?I recall there was a pic of a naked woman on one of the threads a couple of weeks ago. Think it was posted about 8am and took a few hours to be deleted. Had that been a naked man, the whole thread probably would have been deleted in mins.
Perhaps we ought to have a new rule. All bare lady and bare man pictures should be deleted within 5 minutes. If this is breached then a moderator could be taken out and shot in the back of the head as an example to everyone else.
#505
Posted 14 February 2006 - 09:59 AM
#506
Posted 14 February 2006 - 10:05 AM
#507
Posted 14 February 2006 - 10:19 AM
But its a nanny state. These people NEED protection from the bad men. Being stupid is a defence, and companies shouldn't be allowed to prey on these unfortunate individuals.If some twat is so thick that they think (i) someone somewhere finds them remotely attractive and (ii) if they were then it would require your credit card details to get their message then frankly I'm glad someone is going to steal your money. You're far too stupid to do anything sensible with it so the world is better off with you poor.
I refer you to every issue of the "The Judge" in the Sunday Mail
ie. I signed up for this great car, didn't look at the APR, assumed they were descent cos they advertise on Living TV. Paid £600 a month for 4 years and was shocked to find i STILL OWED MONEY.
#508
Posted 14 February 2006 - 11:37 AM
Wise words LD, couldn't agree more.But its a nanny state. These people NEED protection from the bad men. Being stupid is a defence, and companies shouldn't be allowed to prey on these unfortunate individuals.If some twat is so thick that they think (i) someone somewhere finds them remotely attractive and (ii) if they were then it would require your credit card details to get their message then frankly I'm glad someone is going to steal your money. You're far too stupid to do anything sensible with it so the world is better off with you poor.
I refer you to every issue of the "The Judge" in the Sunday Mail
ie. I signed up for this great car, didn't look at the APR, assumed they were descent cos they advertise on Living TV. Paid £600 a month for 4 years and was shocked to find i STILL OWED MONEY.
Ash
#509
Posted 14 February 2006 - 01:17 PM
Hear hear !!!ie. I signed up for this great car, didn't look at the APR, assumed they were descent cos they advertise on Living TV. Paid £600 a month for 4 years and was shocked to find i STILL OWED MONEY.
It's amazing isn't it... you pay 100 payments of £100 for a £30k car..... is that okay mr customer? Yeah that's great cos then i get a 30k car for 10k... this garage is great....
MORONS!!!!!!!!!
sorry, i work in finance
#510
Posted 14 February 2006 - 01:17 PM
I dont meam that at all, all I meant is that the 'rules' seem to be more laxed towards blokes. When its the other way around, your on it straightaway.What are you suggesting? That the mods left the bare lady picture for a few hours before deleting it so it could be "used" by the males on the forum? Surely if there were double standards then pictures of bare ladies would be left for alway. I recall being the one that deleted two bare lady pictures which had been posted in the middle of the bloody night. What would you like, a 24 hour watch?
Perhaps we ought to have a new rule. All bare lady and bare man pictures should be deleted within 5 minutes. If this is breached then a moderator could be taken out and shot in the back of the head as an example to everyone else.
You lot get away with things that we dont/would'nt.
You know I didnt mean that at all but you had to go OTT just to try and make a point. Now stop being a miserable old fart
#511
Posted 14 February 2006 - 01:32 PM
I still don't understand. How can not getting round to delete a picture for a bit be considered a relaxation of the rules?I dont meam that at all, all I meant is that the 'rules' seem to be more laxed towards blokes. When its the other way around, your on it straightaway.
Also my own personal score is:
Bare ladies deleted - 3
Bare men deleted - 0
#512
Posted 14 February 2006 - 03:26 PM
#513
Posted 15 February 2006 - 09:34 AM
My point on the rules seem to be relaxed towards the blokes go like this:I still don't understand. How can not getting round to delete a picture for a bit be considered a relaxation of the rules?
Also my own personal score is:
Bare ladies deleted - 3
Bare men deleted - 0
There was a thread on here asking how men preferred 'tits', which had a poll in it asking how you liked them. Not sure if this has been deleted now, but did have at least 6 or 7 pages on it so went on for a while.
We opened a thread, specifically in response to the threads that some men open on here. Cant remember what the tiltle was called but, it was basically asking how women prefer dicks. Must have had about 2 or 3 replies, and the penis pictures, and the whole thread was deleted, and not just the 2 pics. Now doesnt that say double standards
I'm trying to on or anything but I'm just trying to proove to you the difference.
#514 Guest_AntB (Guest)
Posted 15 February 2006 - 09:54 AM
chests and genitalia are different.There was a thread on here asking how men preferred 'tits', which had a poll in it asking how you liked them. Not sure if this has been deleted now, but did have at least 6 or 7 pages on it so went on for a while.
We opened a thread.... it was basically asking how women prefer dicks. Must have had about 2 or 3 replies, and the penis pictures, and the whole thread was deleted, and not just the 2 pics. Now doesnt that say double standards
I'm trying to on or anything but I'm just trying to proove to you the difference.
HTH
Edited by AntB, 15 February 2006 - 09:56 AM.
#515
Posted 15 February 2006 - 10:04 AM
Edited by ElizP987, 15 February 2006 - 10:06 AM.
#516
Posted 15 February 2006 - 10:47 AM
#517
Posted 15 February 2006 - 11:09 AM
Edited by ElizP987, 15 February 2006 - 11:18 AM.
#518
Posted 15 February 2006 - 11:16 AM
Edited by chuno, 15 February 2006 - 11:17 AM.
#519 Guest_AntB (Guest)
Posted 15 February 2006 - 11:19 AM
*ding*Liz, that thread you are reffering to, i totally agree myself, I thought it was completely out of order and not something we all needed to know about. A couple of times I nearly had had a bit of a at the author, but I decided against it.
I really wanted to do this after reading some of his later replies in the thread as well. It just seemed to me that the whole point of the thread was that he wanted to brag that he's 'had loads of women in his vx and he's got this reputation for being a stud etc etc',and seemed intent on giving us all of the details. Not something I particualrly wanted to read
#520
Posted 15 February 2006 - 11:24 AM
Maybe the mods should open a new SMUT-Enter at your own risk. catergory!
This is something R1CHY has mentioned a few times incidentaly! He would love to see more male nudity! (its a S Wales thing!)
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users