Jump to content


Photo

Smart Roadster


  • Please log in to reply
51 replies to this topic

#1 TurboTomato

TurboTomato

    K-Series Detonator

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,881 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tunbridge Wells

Posted 22 August 2005 - 02:46 PM

I know that one or two people on here have them What are they like to own/run? How often do they need servicing?

#2 MikeGF

MikeGF

    Member

  • Pip
  • 74 posts

Posted 22 August 2005 - 03:47 PM

thumbsup Cracking little cars, go like stink (no, really!) have launch control, flappy paddles, easy to get the tail out, use virtually no petrol, convertible, decent sized boot in the front, turbo sounds like tweety, they can embaress many cars ;) Roof electrically rolls back into the boot. A real laugh, I had one for 4 Months - I had the Roadster, not the coupe, it was a hoot. I think servicing is every 6k miles.. Very plasticy though, however would recomend one.. Cheers MikeGF

#3 TurboTomato

TurboTomato

    K-Series Detonator

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,881 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tunbridge Wells

Posted 23 August 2005 - 08:04 AM

How much for a service? 6k miles is a bit of a pita, I do about 15k a year What are the residuals like? Say if I payed £10k for a 54 plate one how much would it be worth a year later with say 20k on the clock?

#4 JimH

JimH

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,074 posts
  • Location:Pitgober
  • Interests:yachting, diving, steam waggons, cars that don't break down, giving up on the output of any car builder from Norfolk.

Posted 23 August 2005 - 08:13 AM

Two months ago it was a TVR. Now its a Smart Roadster. Let's take a journey forward in time to answer the next question before it has even been asked. Yes, TT, I think that secondhand Peruda Nippa would be a great car to have. It's done all it's depreciating and it'll give you thousands of miles of great motoring. Oh and don't marry her. You've only just met the girl and I don't think she's right for you.

#5 TurboTomato

TurboTomato

    K-Series Detonator

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,881 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tunbridge Wells

Posted 23 August 2005 - 09:14 AM

Oh and don't marry her. You've only just met the girl and I don't think she's right for you.

:grouphug:

#6 MikeGF

MikeGF

    Member

  • Pip
  • 74 posts

Posted 23 August 2005 - 09:14 AM

I lost £2k in 4 months, however, they have now stopped making them, so depreciation should level out a bit. Up to 60 they were great fun, over that, well.. It runs out of puff really, 80 was top top wack. I never took it on the motorway as it was too small and the slightes breeze sent you flying across the lanes. Stick with the VX ;)

#7 TurboTomato

TurboTomato

    K-Series Detonator

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,881 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tunbridge Wells

Posted 23 August 2005 - 09:21 AM

Two months ago it was a TVR. Now its a Smart Roadster. Let's take a journey forward in time to answer the next question before it has even been asked.

Unfortunately that's the difference between living in a shared house, and living in a nice flat in a nice place on your own....... something has to give

I'm fed up with the turbot loosing money hand over fist at the moment :beat: It's got enough miles on it now and I'll be doing more now that I've moved

I'd rather put my money into something that will at least hold it's value not too badly over a year, pay off some debts and then look to get one in a year or so again

So it's not a girl :P

#8 ad172

ad172

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,054 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cardiff
  • Interests:Motorsport, Driving

Posted 23 August 2005 - 10:01 AM

Paul I feel for you mate. :( I'm in exactly the same boat as you. Thinking of getting my own place but wondering if I would need to pimp out my A-hole to R1CHY in order to afford the VX!!!

#9 JG

JG

    Newbie

  • 13,612 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Berks

Posted 23 August 2005 - 10:16 AM

I love the smart roadster, the gearbox will irritate you no end when you first have a go, but stick with it and after a while you get used to it ( a slight lift of the throttle when you change will help) . I recon its the closest car to the vx/elise in terms of ideology. The vx is a million times better at most things, but the smart can be rewarding in the same way. If you are worried about resuduals though, i would go for an older (than 54) one, such as an 03 or 52 which will be coming to the end of its depreciation and will probably lose the least amount of cash whether you add 10k to it or not. Actually the best thing you can do, is return to the NA world...

#10 TurboTomato

TurboTomato

    K-Series Detonator

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,881 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tunbridge Wells

Posted 23 August 2005 - 03:11 PM

Yeah I've been a friend's standard (for2) smart and the gearchange was really laggy on that Oh I can't decide..... :( :beat:

#11 JG

JG

    Newbie

  • 13,612 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Berks

Posted 23 August 2005 - 03:16 PM

i recon (IMO of course :unsure: not knowing circumptances etc) that you should hold onto the vx for a little longer, it is possible that residuals will improve or at least level out. thumbsup if not as i said get an upgrade: na vx :P :lol:

#12 JG

JG

    Newbie

  • 13,612 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Berks

Posted 23 August 2005 - 03:17 PM

oh and roadster gear change is only slightly better than for2. :(

#13 robfenn

robfenn

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,955 posts
  • Location:Kent
  • Interests:Sports, Photography, Travelling, Racing Cars.

Posted 23 August 2005 - 03:23 PM

You get used to the gearchange. It's not as bad as what the magazines endlessly moan about. My major worry would be that Smart might not be around for much longer limping along with its pruned (not selling Roadster/Coupes anymore are they?), over expensive range. My dad has a normal Smart, its fun and all but for what it is the price is a joke, ultimately you can get better for the money. I think you'd have to like the quirkyness of it to bother. You can spend more money on a Roadster than my Mini Cooper which is about 100 times better. -Rob

#14 JJEuropa

JJEuropa

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 310 posts
  • Location:Cornwall
  • Interests:I've got a Sports Boat and enjoy using that. Have also joined the Cornwall Sports Car Club which is great as we have a good mix of cars and people and the social side is good.<br><br>Also enjoy Australian wine and eating out.

Posted 23 August 2005 - 04:28 PM

I test drove one a few months ago when the wife was looking around but I felt it red lined to quickly. Apart from that I was well impressed. JJ

#15 NOEXCESSBAGGAGE

NOEXCESSBAGGAGE

    Super Duper Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 690 posts
  • Location:Burma

Posted 23 August 2005 - 05:08 PM

Roadster. Bird at work has one. She's had endless problems with it, it's virtually lived at the dealer's for half of the past six months, and she's not impressed. At present, she's rather angry - so, I'm steering clear of her till she sorts it all out with them.

#16 Carl220

Carl220

    Member

  • Pip
  • 21 posts
  • Location:West Midlands, near cannock

Posted 23 August 2005 - 06:41 PM

Smart Roadster 0-62.5mph 10.9 sec 80 bhp Ok, so they have great fuel consumption and will probably take you to Australia and back on a full tank but these things just don't compare to the VX. I've never driven one of these so my opinion is only based on looks (which I think are awful! Too much plastic!) and technical data, personally the car just doesn't appeal to me? Keep the VX! :D

#17 Mike9009

Mike9009

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 359 posts
  • Location:Isle of Wight

Posted 23 August 2005 - 06:50 PM

TT Hopefully try to answer some of your questions. Servicing is every 7500 miles (dependent upon dash lights though) and costs for an 'A' service about £150 from Smart, although SmartArse Design can do it for £120. Regularly get 50+ mpg and never below 40mpg so it is easy on the fuel. Insurance group 9. Handling is fun, although on the limit it can be a little 'snappy' (definitely not VX standards but certainly mk1 MX5s). Just turn off the intrusive traction control. :D The 'manual' automatic box is not bad ... only thing is when the box is protecting the clutch at launch from standstill. Tends to slow traffic light grand prixs down :rolleyes: Once moving it is a surprisingly quick change ... don't know why all the journalists moaned so much??? I moved from an NA VX to the Roadster Coupe. Therefore quoted 0-62 times should be ignored due to the protection of clutch. I have since had the car remapped and new airfilter boosting the power to a mighty 92bhp. Others have remapped to 110bhp but I was a little worried about the longevity of the engine at this level of tune. (Standard is 80bhp) Touch wood, I have had no problems with mine in the first six months. Many stories about leaking roofs (but you bought a VX??), but mine is watertight. Try a test drive. Not sure about the long term residuals of these cars ... but UK was the biggest market for them and all the run-out models are coming this way. Smart reckon they have enough new stocks to meet demand until Spring 2006. Lots of dealers are not good (surprise, surprise !)... search out a good one (or specialist) on funkysmart.co.uk. Mike

#18 Pidgeon

Pidgeon

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,254 posts

Posted 24 August 2005 - 06:13 AM

all the run-out models are coming this way


And why is that - because only the Brits have been dumb enough to buy them. Smart is in limbo awaiting a German with big enough balls to axe the loss making operation.

The roadster/coupe is drastically overpriced and the main reason Smart have enough stock to last (probably five cars) is very few buyers are gullible enough to pay the asking price.

The cars will only be shifted by heavy discounting which can only lead to poor residuals.

TT, you will have taken the hit on the VX, by the time you factor in the 'cost to change,' I think you need to keep it. thumbsup

#19 NOEXCESSBAGGAGE

NOEXCESSBAGGAGE

    Super Duper Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 690 posts
  • Location:Burma

Posted 24 August 2005 - 09:19 AM

CAR magazine.

Pub Fact....
"Brabus version defines poor value for money"

#20 Mike9009

Mike9009

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 359 posts
  • Location:Isle of Wight

Posted 24 August 2005 - 10:53 AM

all the run-out models are coming this way



The roadster/coupe is drastically overpriced and the main reason Smart have enough stock to last (probably five cars) is very few buyers are gullible enough to pay the asking price.

The cars will only be shifted by heavy discounting which can only lead to poor residuals.



Precisely, if you do buy make sure you get a decent discount. The list price is way too high. What other roadster can you get new for about £11,000( after negotiation :D ), with electric soft-top, air con, heated leather seats, electric windows etc etc etc....
Brabus editions are a complete joke! (£17,000 iirc)

I seem to remember the N/A VXes being discounted in the end ... new ones for about £19,000???

Long term no one knows what will happen to residuals... but with oil prices going through the roof, a small engined, fuel efficient roadster is not necesarily a bad place to put your money? Does this make me dumb for buying one??

I love a good discussion :poke:

Mike




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users