

Posted 13 March 2012 - 02:27 PM
Posted 13 March 2012 - 02:32 PM
My personal opinion would be that my own Phase 3 ITB is far better than a Basic Stage 2 SC, however the cost difference between the two is worlds apart.
It costs roughly £7500 to convert a standard NA to a 300bhp SC and that is roughly the same as my ITB Phase 3
So which would I prefer to own;
a 300bhp SC or my Phase 3 ITB
Throttle bodies everytime
Posted 13 March 2012 - 02:36 PM
Posted 13 March 2012 - 02:44 PM
Posted 13 March 2012 - 02:47 PM
Posted 13 March 2012 - 02:50 PM
when are you building me a gearbox Neil?
Posted 13 March 2012 - 02:51 PM
Posted 13 March 2012 - 07:52 PM
It costs roughly £7500 to convert a standard NA to a 300bhp SC and that is roughly the same as my ITB Phase 3
Posted 13 March 2012 - 07:57 PM
Posted 13 March 2012 - 07:59 PM
Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:04 PM
So which is better, the SC or the ITB?
Interesting reading the ITB claims and comparisons now the SC is a proven bolt on 250BHP on standard Z22SE internals.
Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:07 PM
So which is better, the SC or the ITB?
Interesting reading the ITB claims and comparisons now the SC is a proven bolt on 250BHP on standard Z22SE internals.
im for ITBs just based on sound alone!
No denying though the SC option is better bang for buck.
Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:08 PM
So which is better, the SC or the ITB?
Interesting reading the ITB claims and comparisons now the SC is a proven bolt on 250BHP on standard Z22SE internals.
im for ITBs just based on sound alone!
No denying though the SC option is better bang for buck.
I have to agree, the ITBs sound like a real car should sound, much better than the SC. In fact I had the ITB conversion on order for over a year before I gave up waiting and fitted the SC.
Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:14 PM
Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:18 PM
Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:19 PM
Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:38 PM
SC is more OEM because the LSJ was always the intension rather than the crappy LET.
I bumped this for information rather than reignite the debate
To be honest i'd be happy with either, its all about the journey to get there rather than the result.
Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:40 PM
To be honest i'd be happy with either, its all about the journey to get there rather than the result.
Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:44 PM
£13k
my £7.5k included a £2k 6 speed gearbox conversion
Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:45 PM
To be honest i'd be happy with either
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users