Jump to content


Photo

Throttle Bodies


  • Please log in to reply
766 replies to this topic

#741 vocky

vocky

    Moderator

  • 11,969 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

Posted 13 March 2012 - 02:27 PM

My personal opinion would be that my own Phase 3 ITB is far better than a Basic Stage 2 SC, however the cost difference between the two is worlds apart. It costs roughly £7500 to convert a standard NA to a 300bhp SC and that is roughly the same as my ITB Phase 3 :rolleyes: So which would I prefer to own; a 300bhp SC or my Phase 3 ITB Throttle bodies everytime :wub:

#742 siztenboots

siztenboots

    RaceMode

  • 26,613 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Surrey
  • Interests:french maids

Posted 13 March 2012 - 02:32 PM

My personal opinion would be that my own Phase 3 ITB is far better than a Basic Stage 2 SC, however the cost difference between the two is worlds apart.

It costs roughly £7500 to convert a standard NA to a 300bhp SC and that is roughly the same as my ITB Phase 3 :rolleyes:

So which would I prefer to own;

a 300bhp SC or my Phase 3 ITB

Throttle bodies everytime :wub:


you should charge more,

sbd have their kit on the 2L XE engine
Taper Throttle & Engine Kit 290+bhp £13,057.97

#743 vocky

vocky

    Moderator

  • 11,969 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

Posted 13 March 2012 - 02:36 PM

£13k :mellow: my £7.5k included a £2k 6 speed gearbox conversion :D

#744 JG

JG

    Newbie

  • 13,612 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Berks

Posted 13 March 2012 - 02:44 PM

when are you building me a gearbox Neil? :D

#745 slindborg

slindborg

    The Bishop of Stortford

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,602 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:.

Posted 13 March 2012 - 02:47 PM

:lol: @ SBD prices

#746 CocoPops

CocoPops

    SuperCharged Karting Super Hero

  • 17,181 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thatcham, Berks

Posted 13 March 2012 - 02:50 PM

when are you building me a gearbox Neil? :D


Thought your were spending no more money! :lol:

#747 JG

JG

    Newbie

  • 13,612 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Berks

Posted 13 March 2012 - 02:51 PM

oh yeah. well erm, you know Gearboxes are a consumable. thumbsup

#748 Mike (Cliffie)

Mike (Cliffie)

    Back in a VX

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,353 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Yorkshire
  • Interests:Weaving weasels woolly hats.

Posted 13 March 2012 - 07:52 PM



It costs roughly £7500 to convert a standard NA to a 300bhp SC and that is roughly the same as my ITB Phase 3 :rolleyes:



I reckon nearer £6,000 for the Stage 3 SC 300 BHP, £1,500 less and 50 BHP more.

I love the sound of the throttle bodies but it is a labour of love to get them to 240 BHP.

The SC route, stage 2 is £4,200 with exhaust and 250 BHP bang. That saves £3,300 over the same powered ITBs. I wonder why Webber are not selling loads???

#749 badgerade

badgerade

    Need to get Out More

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,173 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Reading

Posted 13 March 2012 - 07:57 PM

Are those prices based on new parts? (Not trying to stir things up, genuinely interested!) I see quite a lot of the S/C conversions are done with second hand bits, whereas the TB's are normally new. Although I guess a large chunk of the cost comes from the exhaust/manifold.

#750 slindborg

slindborg

    The Bishop of Stortford

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,602 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:.

Posted 13 March 2012 - 07:59 PM

Most of the tb route would be engine work that you simply cannot buy "off the shelf" so to speak.

#751 Noodle1791

Noodle1791

    Super Duper Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 520 posts

Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:04 PM

So which is better, the SC or the ITB?

Interesting reading the ITB claims and comparisons now the SC is a proven bolt on 250BHP on standard Z22SE internals.


im for ITBs just based on sound alone!
No denying though the SC option is better bang for buck.

#752 Mike (Cliffie)

Mike (Cliffie)

    Back in a VX

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,353 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Yorkshire
  • Interests:Weaving weasels woolly hats.

Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:07 PM


So which is better, the SC or the ITB?

Interesting reading the ITB claims and comparisons now the SC is a proven bolt on 250BHP on standard Z22SE internals.


im for ITBs just based on sound alone!
No denying though the SC option is better bang for buck.


I have to agree, the ITBs sound like a real car should sound, much better than the SC. In fact I had the ITB conversion on order for over a year before I gave up waiting and fitted the SC.

#753 Mike (Cliffie)

Mike (Cliffie)

    Back in a VX

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,353 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Yorkshire
  • Interests:Weaving weasels woolly hats.

Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:08 PM



So which is better, the SC or the ITB?

Interesting reading the ITB claims and comparisons now the SC is a proven bolt on 250BHP on standard Z22SE internals.


im for ITBs just based on sound alone!
No denying though the SC option is better bang for buck.


I have to agree, the ITBs sound like a real car should sound, much better than the SC. In fact I had the ITB conversion on order for over a year before I gave up waiting and fitted the SC.


I must add, I am so pleased I did the SC and not the ITB BTW. I love the power.

#754 JG

JG

    Newbie

  • 13,612 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Berks

Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:14 PM

SC is more OEM because the LSJ was always the intension rather than the crappy LET. :D I bumped this for information rather than reignite the debate :lol: To be honest i'd be happy with either, its all about the journey to get there rather than the result.

#755 slindborg

slindborg

    The Bishop of Stortford

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,602 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:.

Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:18 PM

20xe with the sbd Ali block and then built for 230is bhp on jenveys...... Mmmmmmm, I've actually got a lob on thinking about it lol

#756 Noodle1791

Noodle1791

    Super Duper Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 520 posts

Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:19 PM

So shall we leave the debate there....till next time.lol i love our little cars!!

#757 Mike (Cliffie)

Mike (Cliffie)

    Back in a VX

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,353 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Yorkshire
  • Interests:Weaving weasels woolly hats.

Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:38 PM

SC is more OEM because the LSJ was always the intension rather than the crappy LET. :D

I bumped this for information rather than reignite the debate :lol:

To be honest i'd be happy with either, its all about the journey to get there rather than the result.


But I missed it first time round and now we all have a degree in hindsight on this subject, it is funny as fcuk reading it now.

"No, no, no, the ITB's will give more power than the SC which will all blow up anyway."

#758 Goosenka

Goosenka

    Jeep Driving jolly nice chap

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,716 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Anywhere near water
  • Interests:Fried breakfasts, coffee and dogs

Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:40 PM


To be honest i'd be happy with either, its all about the journey to get there rather than the result.


thumbsup

#759 hughcam

hughcam

    Super Duper Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 730 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hemsworth, West Yorkshire
  • Interests:driving, motorcycling, snowboarding, v12 lawn mowers

Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:44 PM

£13k :mellow:

my £7.5k included a £2k 6 speed gearbox conversion :D


Does the £7,500 include a exhaust aswell? I am seriously considering just getting the ITB kit for my standard N/A then doing the rest over the next couple of years.....

#760 ChrisS1

ChrisS1

    Club OEM

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,360 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Walers

Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:45 PM


To be honest i'd be happy with either


If only...




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users