
As Promised - Spax Group Buy
#261
Posted 27 March 2006 - 09:47 AM
#262
Posted 30 March 2006 - 09:53 AM


#263
Posted 30 March 2006 - 10:19 PM

#264
Posted 31 March 2006 - 08:48 AM
#265
Posted 31 March 2006 - 09:08 AM

#266
Posted 31 March 2006 - 09:21 AM
#267
Posted 31 March 2006 - 11:11 AM

#268
Posted 02 April 2006 - 04:59 PM
#269
Posted 03 April 2006 - 07:42 PM
















Edited by SteveM, 03 April 2006 - 07:43 PM.
#270
Posted 04 April 2006 - 11:19 AM
#271
Posted 04 April 2006 - 11:45 AM
A word of advice (i've learned the hard way)Whilst sitting reading your post Steve I was thinking about the decision / risk I (and the rest of us) had made by going for what is generally seen as the cheap option when compared to Ohlins and Nitrons.
I was definately in two minds about the Spax right up until the same moment you have just experienced, which was the ride home.
It's still to be seen how these kits last over time as opinions here state the build quality shouldn't be as good as the competition. At the moment though, I can't see any reason how I could have justified spending the extra on the other two.
I feel I have achieved what I set out to do which was to primarily lower the car, second, not to mess up what was a pretty comfortable ride, and finally to make the handling much more positive.
I would recommend these to anyone who was in the same situation.

Had my spax on now for almost 3 years and no problems until now. They still perform OK but the adjuster rings and the shocker stiffness adjusters are stuck solid on all 4 corners(despite giving them an annual soaking of WD40 etc).
I last adjusted them last summer so my advice is make sure you move all adjustable parts on a regular basis to avoid this.
I'm not too bothered about this since i got them at a good price like yourselves but perhaps this is why Spax are cheaper than Nitrons etc.
Would be nice to know if Nitrons suffer from similar problems

Edited by PaulCP, 04 April 2006 - 11:47 AM.
#272
Posted 04 April 2006 - 02:12 PM
My sentiments exactlyWhilst sitting reading your post Steve I was thinking about the decision / risk I (and the rest of us) had made by going for what is generally seen as the cheap option when compared to Ohlins and Nitrons.
I was definately in two minds about the Spax right up until the same moment you have just experienced, which was the ride home.
It's still to be seen how these kits last over time as opinions here state the build quality shouldn't be as good as the competition. At the moment though, I can't see any reason how I could have justified spending the extra on the other two.
I feel I have achieved what I set out to do which was to primarily lower the car, second, not to mess up what was a pretty comfortable ride, and finally to make the handling much more positive.
I would recommend these to anyone who was in the same situation.

Now recommended without hesitation, but I will admit being slightly hesitant because of the "bad press" the Spax have had compared with the other (more expensive) makes. They have achieved exactly what I wanted at about half the price of what I was about to spend.
PaulCP, your comments are duly noted


The moral to the story is you pay your money and you take your choice. Nitrons are undoubtedly better quality than Spax, but Ohlins are better quality than Nitrons - where do you stop. Each to their own, but I for one am happy with my purchase.
Steve
#273
Posted 04 April 2006 - 04:54 PM
Totally agree, that was the sentiment in my postPaulCP, your comments are duly noted
, but even if you went to the extreme and binned them after 3 or 4 years due to total neglect, you could buy another set and get them professionally setup again for the same money as one set of Nitrons for example. However, I will try not to let that happen
.
The moral to the story is you pay your money and you take your choice. Nitrons are undoubtedly better quality than Spax, but Ohlins are better quality than Nitrons - where do you stop. Each to their own, but I for one am happy with my purchase.
Steve

2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users