I would have thought that if they were going to let go mine would have gone before now bearing in mind the amount of track work it's been through since the conversion.
Hi Paul! Running since Sep 24 2005 I believe


Posted 25 April 2007 - 01:46 AM
I would have thought that if they were going to let go mine would have gone before now bearing in mind the amount of track work it's been through since the conversion.
Posted 25 April 2007 - 01:11 PM
I would have thought that if they were going to let go mine would have gone before now bearing in mind the amount of track work it's been through since the conversion.
Hi Paul! Running since Sep 24 2005 I believeCan you remind us of the power figures
Posted 25 April 2007 - 04:54 PM
That said, Jon indicates above they had to lower compression to get into the higher HP's. That said the bloke I'm buying the kit off indicated he had stage 2 245+HP running on a standard setup.....
Posted 25 April 2007 - 05:25 PM
Thanks Paul! You went back to the standard exhaust manifold, correct?
That said, Jon indicates above they had to lower compression to get into the higher HP's. That said the bloke I'm buying the kit off indicated he had stage 2 245+HP running on a standard setup.....
The key to this is ignition timing - i don't think the courtney kit has the ability to adjust the ignition timing so they have to lower the static compression ratio. The GM kit comes with a reflash to the stock ECU which would retard the timing a bit on boost, and you can do the same with your mappable ECU
Posted 25 April 2007 - 05:28 PM
Thanks Paul! You went back to the standard exhaust manifold, correct?
Edited by paulf-cam, 25 April 2007 - 05:29 PM.
Posted 25 April 2007 - 07:18 PM
From memory about 220 or so lb ft torque (200Nm is only 148 lb ft) And Yes very flat
I would have thought that if they were going to let go mine would have gone before now bearing in mind the amount of track work it's been through since the conversion.
Hi Paul! Running since Sep 24 2005 I believeCan you remind us of the power figures
I think Pauls car is running at around 243.5bhp from memory
Unsure about the torque figures 200ishNm? and very flat
Posted 26 April 2007 - 06:06 PM
From memory about 220 or so lb ft torque (200Nm is only 148 lb ft) And Yes very flat
I would have thought that if they were going to let go mine would have gone before now bearing in mind the amount of track work it's been through since the conversion.
Hi Paul! Running since Sep 24 2005 I believeCan you remind us of the power figures
I think Pauls car is running at around 243.5bhp from memory
Unsure about the torque figures 200ishNm? and very flat
Posted 02 May 2007 - 12:32 AM
Posted 02 May 2007 - 04:46 PM
Yup, they are at the top end of the manifold... span the full width and lenght.
Posted 02 May 2007 - 07:43 PM
Yup! Am working on the specsAwsome, it is the full fat version then. Just need to connect few pipes, a radiator and a pump and you've got yourself a charge cooler!
Cool and very complete kit, much better for us (ie standalone ECU users) than the official kit
Posted 02 May 2007 - 08:24 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users