
To All Members...
#61
Posted 12 November 2007 - 10:58 PM
#62
Posted 13 November 2007 - 12:02 AM
... Baby Of The Year competition
...The winner gets £1000,
...Texts cost 50p plus standard network charge
...To text please send the word GE BABY followed by ... 65100
The number also ends up sending you occasional SMS from a media company of which you will NOT be charged for receiving and text STOP at any time.

#63
Posted 13 November 2007 - 08:09 AM
Found this elsewhere
... Baby Of The Year competition
...The winner gets £1000,
...Texts cost 50p plus standard network charge
...To text please send the word GE BABY followed by ... 65100
The number also ends up sending you occasional SMS from a media company of which you will NOT be charged for receiving and text STOP at any time.
Maybe it is a load of shite then.

#64
Posted 13 November 2007 - 09:59 AM

#65
Posted 13 November 2007 - 10:11 AM
Found this elsewhere
... Baby Of The Year competition
...The winner gets £1000,
...Texts cost 50p plus standard network charge
...To text please send the word GE BABY followed by ... 65100
The number also ends up sending you occasional SMS from a media company of which you will NOT be charged for receiving and text STOP at any time.
Someone somewhere will be making a nice tidy profit out of running that then

#66
Posted 13 November 2007 - 10:57 AM
Maybe??!?
Found this elsewhere
... Baby Of The Year competition
...The winner gets £1000,
...Texts cost 50p plus standard network charge
...To text please send the word GE BABY followed by ... 65100
The number also ends up sending you occasional SMS from a media company of which you will NOT be charged for receiving and text STOP at any time.
Maybe it is a load of shite then.

#67
Posted 13 November 2007 - 01:40 PM




Edited by trescoman, 13 November 2007 - 01:40 PM.
#68
Posted 17 November 2009 - 12:54 PM

#69
Posted 17 November 2009 - 07:53 PM

#70
Posted 17 November 2009 - 08:06 PM

#71
Posted 18 November 2009 - 04:00 PM
My vote goes to Alfie Buckland..........
![]()
![]()
Alfie Buckland Seconded![]()
With eyes that small you'd think he's related to Julian Barrett

JJ
#72
Posted 18 November 2009 - 04:10 PM
she only seems to come on so spam us with somet form of crap or another.... like a day out at Alton towers (while using a photo from Thorpe Park etc lol), a scanveger hunt that im 99% sure no one on here would consider going on.
hence a valid p*ss take
amen
always suspect PP was an attention whore
now I'm sure
please don't pass this failing onto the child
#73
Posted 18 November 2009 - 04:10 PM
My vote goes to Alfie Buckland..........
![]()
![]()
Alfie Buckland Seconded![]()
With eyes that small you'd think he's related to Julian Barrett![]()
JJ

Squint off.
So...who won this then?
#74
Posted 19 November 2009 - 11:08 AM
I have seen both sides...
I know of a child that was left alone from the start, not stimulated, not taught, not helped. They are now just about to start school and can't read, write or even finish a simple jigsaw. The parents are oblivious to this.
Conversely, my niece who is 3 has started to read and write, can do jigsaws, use a computer (yes, really), etc. etc. She was stimulated from day one. Brain development starts when a baby recognises faces and expressions, detects movement, etc. Her parents learned of this and put it into practice and the difference between the two children is incredible.
You talk about people trying to be something they arent, how parents think their little angel is the best in the world and then big up your neice so everyone thinks she is some amazing child protege

I also note your comment on the poor child that is just "about to start school" and cant read - would that be in 10 months time?

By the sound of it you dont even have children?
Anyway, i feel its a bit of fun (not my thing) and i am sure for plenty of people when life is so drudgingly hard, hand to mouth, their child is the shining diamond in their life, its one thing that brings a smile to their and their families faces. And her pics on the net? So what? 95% of abuse occurs from people you know and trust not randon nutters on the web
Edited by cheeky_chops, 19 November 2009 - 11:10 AM.
#75
Posted 19 November 2009 - 11:12 AM

#76
Posted 19 November 2009 - 11:13 AM
Can i just add, i hate kids.
Thankyou.

#77
Posted 19 November 2009 - 11:16 AM

#78
Posted 19 November 2009 - 11:23 AM



Edited by SteveA, 19 November 2009 - 11:23 AM.
#79
Posted 19 November 2009 - 01:09 PM
#80
Posted 19 November 2009 - 01:27 PM
Oh dear, I wish I'd never resurrected this
The pictures, and the initial few light-hearted posts, amused me. It wasn't to have a(nother) dig at PP

4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users