The VX was purely a marketing tool, lead to the VXR brand which was pretty much all vauxhall wanted out of it.
Does this mean Vx had the VXR range planned back in <1999
No
Posted 21 February 2008 - 12:45 PM
The VX was purely a marketing tool, lead to the VXR brand which was pretty much all vauxhall wanted out of it.
Does this mean Vx had the VXR range planned back in <1999
Posted 21 February 2008 - 03:45 PM
Posted 21 February 2008 - 04:16 PM
Edited by P11 COV, 21 February 2008 - 04:16 PM.
Posted 21 February 2008 - 07:18 PM
Posted 22 February 2008 - 10:43 AM
I seem to recall about 25K for the NA and about 28 for the T.
I think I paid around 22K for my first NA in 2002 on Interest free for 3 years.
Posted 22 February 2008 - 10:45 AM
The contract with Lotus was halted prematurely and GM incurred penalties.
Posted 22 February 2008 - 12:14 PM
Posted 22 February 2008 - 06:04 PM
You can get europas now 2k cheaper than the 2007 registered vx that is on autotrader. I hope the europa's rapid decline doesn't hurt vx residuals.
Posted 23 February 2008 - 12:27 AM
The real reason is that Lotus was always only contracted to Build a certain number, I can't remember how many it was
10/10 to that man for the correct answer!![]()
However I do believe that they never produced the intended number due to lack of sales.
Original contract - 9000 VX/Speedsters in 3 years & at the turbo launch we were told how the contract had been extended in time.
It was supposed to have been 2000 VX220's & 1000 Speedsters/year for 3 years by mid 2002 & the stock piling was pretty bad, an outfit called On Time was storing them all.
Posted 24 February 2008 - 09:40 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users