Jump to content


Photo

Na Tuning Results


  • Please log in to reply
278 replies to this topic

#201 ShinyAndy

ShinyAndy

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,345 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Marbella, Spain
  • Interests:Putting the world to rights on forums and teaching people how to drive properly

Posted 02 September 2004 - 04:34 PM

It may well be quicker to stretch the lower gear, rather than have to change up and get the power on again.

Not if you're sat with no power for 1000rpm it won't be, far better off changing gear and being in the power band, maybe the turbot is different but if I change gear at peak power I'm straight back into the powerband in the next gear too

#202 UKspeedster

UKspeedster

    Need to get Out More

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 885 posts
  • Location:US of A

Posted 02 September 2004 - 05:12 PM

It may well be quicker to stretch the lower gear, rather than have to change up and get the power on again.

Not if you're sat with no power for 1000rpm it won't be, far better off changing gear and being in the power band, maybe the turbot is different but if I change gear at peak power I'm straight back into the powerband in the next gear too

No definitive proof either way, but I would argue that there could potentially be situations where having the additional flexibility is beneficial.

It would be churlish of me to suggest it is always better changing up at the higher rev limiter, but you have to admit it's not unusual to occasionally bounce off a rev limiter set only a little beyond 6000rpm (even without the high lift cams), as power drop off is only slight at that stage? :)

#203 clipping_point

clipping_point

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,908 posts
  • Location:Linköping, Sweden

Posted 03 September 2004 - 06:58 AM

I think you can see in the power graphs that the power dies at 6500 rpm, so I would go for the cams AND an improved intake. It is clear from observing the dyno results of Dudes engine that to shift the power curve towards higher revs, you need to improve the flow. And the same applies for racier cams. To benefit from them you need to eliminate the restrictions. Once that is done increasing the revs will make enormous difference!!!!!!!!!!

#204 VIX

VIX

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,497 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milton Keynes

Posted 20 September 2004 - 05:16 PM

Here's my results from 14 September at about 9000 miles. Initial bhp of 141.7 is disappointing but 11.4 bhp hike as a result of Stage 2 seems to be the norm. It'd be interesting to know why the power is down though. :(

#205 damontite

damontite

    Member

  • Pip
  • 177 posts
  • Location:derby
  • Interests:racing, racing, track days, more track days and sex. sadly not at the same time tho...

Posted 20 September 2004 - 05:43 PM

I assume you had a re-map, removed the pre-cat and had a cam kit, and a full exhaust? I had stage 2 and my vx went to 167bhp. Cheers Damon Tite

#206 Jim_Cross

Jim_Cross

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,539 posts
  • Location:Essex

Posted 20 September 2004 - 05:45 PM

Stage 2 doesn't include cams - that sounds more like stage 2.5 (I think stage 3 includes headwork as well) 11bhp doesn't sound right for a stage 2 though - I thought the Milltek alone should give 9-11bhp, so I would expect more like 20bhp including the remap :unsure:

#207 VIX

VIX

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,497 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milton Keynes

Posted 20 September 2004 - 06:01 PM

Thanks for the responses. I had the standard AmD stage 2 - full exhaust, Viper and remap. Graphs show: Before 141.7 bhp @ 5876 and 148.3 lb/ft @ 4174 After 153.1 bhp@ 5752 and 155.1 lb/ft @ 3998 Any ideas why this could be below the average? chinky chinky

Edited by VIX, 20 September 2004 - 06:03 PM.


#208 Jim_Cross

Jim_Cross

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,539 posts
  • Location:Essex

Posted 20 September 2004 - 06:05 PM

That sounds well below average - looking at the table, all the other stage 2s are between 167bhp and 175bhp, although some of these were done when AmD's rolling road was overreading. Could be bad petrol, or an ECU problem? Also, the engine is still pretty tight at 9000 miles

#209 VIX

VIX

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,497 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milton Keynes

Posted 20 September 2004 - 06:15 PM

Jim, I had just refilled with Optimax the night before AmD so hopefully it's not fuel although I reckon it's pinking a bit eg pulling away from roundabouts. AmD say this shouldn't be a problem with all the sensors and anti-knock devices. I've done about 300 miles since getting the car back and plan to do Wales/Anglesey and will probably then pop back to AmD and see what they say. (You're not going to Wales or Anglesey are you?) chinky chinky Steve

#210 Jim_Cross

Jim_Cross

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,539 posts
  • Location:Essex

Posted 20 September 2004 - 06:20 PM

I'm not going to Wales no, bit too far for me :( Good luck getting it sorted. Might be worth a trip to Crownhill to get it plugged in to the Tech 2 to see whether there is an ECU problem. However, there is a charge for using the Tech 2

#211 BogBrush

BogBrush

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,997 posts
  • Location:Essex

Posted 20 September 2004 - 06:30 PM

Those figures do look a little weird. Last time I had my vx on a rolling road, it was pushing 155bhp and 160lb Torque. That was only with a K&N filter,Vauxhall Sports exhaust and the pre cat removed.

#212 VIX

VIX

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,497 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milton Keynes

Posted 20 September 2004 - 06:44 PM

Might be worth a trip to Crownhill to get it plugged in to the Tech 2 to see whether there is an ECU problem. However, there is a charge for using the Tech 2

Presumably AmD don't have a Tech 2? Will Crownhill be bothered that I've had a remap?

#213 VIX

VIX

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,497 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milton Keynes

Posted 20 September 2004 - 06:44 PM

Those figures do look a little weird.
Last time I had my vx on a rolling road, it was pushing 155bhp and 160lb Torque.
That was only with a K&N filter,Vauxhall Sports exhaust and the pre cat removed.

:(

#214 clipping_point

clipping_point

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,908 posts
  • Location:Linköping, Sweden

Posted 21 September 2004 - 05:50 AM

Where did you do this test? If the car feels good then there should be no problem. Also it was a very warm day 27 °C. And how are the tyres?

#215 VIX

VIX

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,497 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milton Keynes

Posted 21 September 2004 - 10:52 AM

Where did you do this test? If the car feels good then there should be no problem. Also it was a very warm day 27 °C. And how are the tyres?

The test was done at AmD before and after the Stage 2. Tyres have a couple of thousand miles left on them - or a couple of track days!

I am not sure if the car feels good - sounds daft but it is now so different not least of which is the noise and reverberation and the effect this has on the perception of speed and when to change gear. I I feel as though it is revving less freely but this is just a feeling and I think the proof will be at Anglesey on Monday. Ideally I can get someone with a similar car to drive mine.
chinky chinky

PS. This is not meant to be any criticism of AmD who are happy to investigate any issues I have and I plan to pop back to them Saturday week. There is also the question of whether the car was down on power to start with.

#216 Jase_MK

Jase_MK

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,277 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milton Keynes

Posted 21 September 2004 - 11:18 AM

Vix, I'm quite happy for you to drive mine if you want. Similar spec to yours but no remap, so yours should feel noticeably quicker. Give us a shout if you want to find a quiet road in MK one evening.

#217 Foxy

Foxy

    I love Nev

  • 10,743 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lichfield

Posted 21 September 2004 - 12:49 PM

What does the graph look like VIX? Is it smooth all the way up? Which technician did the work?

#218 VIX

VIX

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,497 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milton Keynes

Posted 21 September 2004 - 02:56 PM

Foxy, Here's the bhp graph. According to the print out Gary did the work. Jase, I'm pm'ing!

#219 Foxy

Foxy

    I love Nev

  • 10,743 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lichfield

Posted 21 September 2004 - 03:14 PM

:unsure: ooh...that's not great below 4k is it?

#220 jules_s

jules_s

    Iceman

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,275 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Porker showroom
  • Interests:Plane spotting

Posted 21 September 2004 - 03:18 PM

Its gotta be cos the thing is hardly run in surely? I mean theres an absolute mile of difference between a 9k VX and a 20k VX thumbsup




7 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users