![Photo](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/uploads/av-404.jpg?_r=0)
Na Tuning Results
#21
Posted 25 January 2004 - 08:10 AM
#22
Posted 25 January 2004 - 10:54 AM
Attached Files
#23
Posted 25 January 2004 - 11:47 AM
#24
Posted 25 January 2004 - 11:51 AM
#25
Posted 25 January 2004 - 02:35 PM
Attached Files
#26
Posted 25 January 2004 - 02:41 PM
#27
Posted 25 January 2004 - 06:26 PM
#28
Posted 26 January 2004 - 08:08 AM
#29
Posted 26 January 2004 - 09:35 AM
#30
Posted 26 January 2004 - 10:28 AM
#31
Posted 26 January 2004 - 12:05 PM
![:D](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.png)
#32
Posted 26 January 2004 - 12:12 PM
#33
Posted 26 January 2004 - 01:50 PM
...and ask AmD how the hell you can have the same power at the wheels and -7 Bhp at your crankshaftCP you can put me as 10K miles on the clock. If there's space under backox would it be better to show what flavour ie; Regal, rather than an X? Just a thought. cheers
![:blink:](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/blink.png)
#34
Posted 26 January 2004 - 03:38 PM
...and ask AmD how the hell you can have the same power at the wheels and -7 Bhp at your crankshaft
![:unsure:](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/unsure.png)
![:)](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png)
I am a bit curious as to why my graphs HERE are the way they are compared to back in August. It's the same rolling road, both times I was using Optimax fuel, the car is 5k miles more run in and it was a hot day in August. On the surface you would expect better results not worse
![:(](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/sad.png)
![:blink:](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/blink.png)
#35
Posted 26 January 2004 - 03:58 PM
I meant compared to Vortex who had 175,7 bhp at the crank and the same reading 134,5 on the wheels[Sorry I don't understand what you mean. (Please bear with me
) My reading at the wheels was 134.5 Bhp.
![:drink:](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/062802drink_prv.gif)
#36
Posted 26 January 2004 - 04:02 PM
Ahhh I get you nowI meant compared to Vortex who had 175,7 bhp at the crank and the same reading 134,5 on the wheels[Sorry I don't understand what you mean. (Please bear with me
) My reading at the wheels was 134.5 Bhp.
![]()
![:rolleyes:](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)
![:beat:](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/062802beat_prv.gif)
#37
Posted 26 January 2004 - 04:10 PM
Yep !! you've got it - different days, different conditions = different readingsIt's the same rolling road, both times I was using Optimax fuel, the car is 5k miles more run in and it was a hot day in August. On the surface you would expect better results not worse
That's rolling roads for you I suppose
Paul
#38
Posted 26 January 2004 - 05:58 PM
![:lol:](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.png)
![:lol:](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.png)
![:lol:](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.png)
![:lol:](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.png)
Attached Files
#39
Posted 26 January 2004 - 10:20 PM
![:groupjump:](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/jump.gif)
![:rolleyes:](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)
![:P](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/tongue.png)
![:P](http://www.vx220.org.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/tongue.png)
#40
Posted 27 January 2004 - 08:01 AM
Attached Files
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users