Jump to content


Photo

Na Tuning Results


  • Please log in to reply
278 replies to this topic

#21 clipping_point

clipping_point

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,908 posts
  • Location:Linköping, Sweden

Posted 25 January 2004 - 08:10 AM

..and here´s the table

Attached Files



#22 clipping_point

clipping_point

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,908 posts
  • Location:Linköping, Sweden

Posted 25 January 2004 - 10:54 AM

Added some old figures for reference.

Attached Files



#23 vortex

vortex

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 337 posts
  • Location:Leics
  • Interests:BIKES, CARS AND KARTING.

Posted 25 January 2004 - 11:47 AM

The car has a totally standard inlet and was tested using optimax. Got some more info for you. Power tested at the wheels 134.9 bhp Min ambient temp 21 deg c max ambient temp 24 deg c Barometric pressure 992 mb Don't know if this is any use to you, cheers Leon

#24 vortex

vortex

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 337 posts
  • Location:Leics
  • Interests:BIKES, CARS AND KARTING.

Posted 25 January 2004 - 11:51 AM

For got to add price ECU remap £250 The whole biil with the full Milltek including fitting and remapcame to the grand total of, £1169.13

#25 clipping_point

clipping_point

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,908 posts
  • Location:Linköping, Sweden

Posted 25 January 2004 - 02:35 PM

How about this?

Attached Files



#26 clipping_point

clipping_point

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,908 posts
  • Location:Linköping, Sweden

Posted 25 January 2004 - 02:41 PM

BTW does anyone have the Bhp at the wheels for the cars tested on the AmD day? Conditions?

#27 PaulCP

PaulCP

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,064 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Suffolk

Posted 25 January 2004 - 06:26 PM

On the RR day i was running software which gave a lean mixture. After the revised software a revisst to AMD gave 173.5 bhp @ 6271rpm & torque of 161.2 @ 2641 Software has been updated since but no readings available other than before & after sessions at Regal who at the time had RR calibration problems Paul

#28 clipping_point

clipping_point

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,908 posts
  • Location:Linköping, Sweden

Posted 26 January 2004 - 08:08 AM

OK, thanks, I´ll revise the information. The equipment used in your car is right I take it then?

#29 iandhd

iandhd

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,756 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Francisco

Posted 26 January 2004 - 09:35 AM

CP you can put me as 10K miles on the clock. If there's space under backox would it be better to show what flavour ie; Regal, rather than an X? Just a thought. cheers

#30 clipping_point

clipping_point

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,908 posts
  • Location:Linköping, Sweden

Posted 26 January 2004 - 10:28 AM

Yeah, I meant to do that, just didn't have the information. The guys who have "full Milltek" maybe should have a "-" rather than a "X" in the bakbox column.

#31 dh_si

dh_si

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 319 posts
  • Location:Milton Keynes

Posted 26 January 2004 - 12:05 PM

its DH_Si not DI, HI or even BI Si!!! I race downhill mtbs hence the DH bit. I am not Welsh nor am i gay!!!!!!!! :D

#32 dh_si

dh_si

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 319 posts
  • Location:Milton Keynes

Posted 26 January 2004 - 12:12 PM

anyway! My results are.. Full Milltek and Viper. 155.3 bhp @5821rpm and 158.1 lbft @4170 after AMD stage1 170.3 bhp @5794 and 169.5 lbft @4170 10000 miles all on BP Ultimate

#33 clipping_point

clipping_point

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,908 posts
  • Location:Linköping, Sweden

Posted 26 January 2004 - 01:50 PM

CP you can put me as 10K miles on the clock. If there's space under backox would it be better to show what flavour ie; Regal, rather than an X? Just a thought. cheers

...and ask AmD how the hell you can have the same power at the wheels and -7 Bhp at your crankshaft :blink:

#34 iandhd

iandhd

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,756 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Francisco

Posted 26 January 2004 - 03:38 PM

...and ask AmD how the hell you can have the same power at the wheels and -7 Bhp at your crankshaft :blink:

:unsure: ?? Sorry I don't understand what you mean. (Please bear with me :) ) My reading at the wheels was 134.5 Bhp. I don't know what you mean by -7bhp?

I am a bit curious as to why my graphs HERE are the way they are compared to back in August. It's the same rolling road, both times I was using Optimax fuel, the car is 5k miles more run in and it was a hot day in August. On the surface you would expect better results not worse :( That's rolling roads for you I suppose :blink:

#35 clipping_point

clipping_point

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,908 posts
  • Location:Linköping, Sweden

Posted 26 January 2004 - 03:58 PM

[Sorry I don't understand what you mean. (Please bear with me :) ) My reading at the wheels was 134.5 Bhp.

I meant compared to Vortex who had 175,7 bhp at the crank and the same reading 134,5 on the wheels :drink:

#36 iandhd

iandhd

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,756 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Francisco

Posted 26 January 2004 - 04:02 PM

[Sorry I don't understand what you mean. (Please bear with me  :) ) My reading at the wheels was 134.5 Bhp.

I meant compared to Vortex who had 175,7 bhp at the crank and the same reading 134,5 on the wheels :drink:

Ahhh I get you now :rolleyes: Yeah I see what you mean. How does that work then? :beat:

#37 PaulCP

PaulCP

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,064 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Suffolk

Posted 26 January 2004 - 04:10 PM

It's the same rolling road, both times I was using Optimax fuel, the car is 5k miles more run in and it was a hot day in August. On the surface you would expect better results not worse :( That's rolling roads for you I suppose :blink:

Yep !! you've got it - different days, different conditions = different readings

Paul

#38 clipping_point

clipping_point

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,908 posts
  • Location:Linköping, Sweden

Posted 26 January 2004 - 05:58 PM

The difference in conditions (134,5/134,5) may be that you bought the backbox from Regal and not the guy who made the BHP calculation, Ian :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Anyhow, here is the result of the Swedish jury:

Attached Files



#39 cheeky_chops

cheeky_chops

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,922 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Solihull
  • Interests:my car, snowboarding and drinking

Posted 26 January 2004 - 10:20 PM

Exellent little sheet :groupjump: My mileage was 23000. temp was 1416c 1000mb power at wheels 138.8bhp@5738rpm Just a "small" point :rolleyes: - surely torque wins races and bhp sells cars?? :P :P

#40 clipping_point

clipping_point

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,908 posts
  • Location:Linköping, Sweden

Posted 27 January 2004 - 08:01 AM

...and I might add that the BHP at the wheels are more helpful in acceleration, than the ones in the calculator! You the leader in that discipline with a massive 4 BHP. Congrats!

Attached Files






3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users