Shouldn't it also provide better top end flow => power. Maybe the exhaust manifold is too restrictive? What kind of manifold does Rubber have?i certainly think that the headwork has helped with midrange torque on mine...
Na Tuning Results
#81
Posted 12 February 2004 - 11:55 AM
#82
Posted 12 February 2004 - 12:15 PM
I don't know if there is room for bigger valves but that is another option to be considered.
For me, I'd like to see the end game for me being:
- Gas flowed, big valve head
- Race cams
- Direct to head throttle bodies
- 4:1 exhaust manifold
- Race cat and sports exhaust
- Lightened flywheel
With all of that, I'd be hopeful to get about 100 bhp/litre out of the car. It's a similar spec to the Elise Sport 190, but probably with a bit milder cams to retain a bit of low down torque.
Paul
#83
Posted 12 February 2004 - 02:19 PM
#84
Posted 12 February 2004 - 02:27 PM
How do you know???The Regal one (manifold) is not much better than standard?
#85
Posted 12 February 2004 - 03:04 PM
#86
Posted 12 February 2004 - 03:30 PM
Edited by garyk220, 12 February 2004 - 03:32 PM.
#87
Posted 12 February 2004 - 03:36 PM
#88
Posted 12 February 2004 - 08:02 PM
#89
Posted 12 February 2004 - 08:12 PM
#90
Posted 12 February 2004 - 10:01 PM
#91
Posted 12 February 2004 - 10:33 PM
What? 144 WHP meaning around 180 HP at the crank?I have k&n in/kit and had it RR just befor the bala meet I had 144 bhp@ 6120 rpm and 138 lbft @4500 rpm at the wheels I think this is prity good.
Bad news for Rubber I´d say....... all that money...
#92
Posted 12 February 2004 - 10:43 PM
Edited by DAZ, 12 February 2004 - 10:48 PM.
#93
Posted 12 February 2004 - 10:52 PM
no way, aint going to happen. BHP yes!!I have k&n in/kit and had it RR just befor the bala meet I had 144 bhp@ 6120 rpm and 138 lbft @4500 rpm at the wheels I think this is prity good.
Ian
#94
Posted 12 February 2004 - 10:57 PM
#95
Posted 12 February 2004 - 10:58 PM
#96
Posted 12 February 2004 - 11:00 PM
#97
Posted 12 February 2004 - 11:10 PM
No need to shoutWHAT AINT GOING TO HAPPEN M8
#98
Posted 12 February 2004 - 11:13 PM
#99
Posted 12 February 2004 - 11:35 PM
#100
Posted 12 February 2004 - 11:40 PM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users