Now THATS a good idea! cheers cheersCan't we make the RR somewhere else so we can get independent results from cars that have been tuned by AMD?
Na Tuning Results
#121
Posted 15 February 2004 - 04:37 PM
#122
Posted 15 February 2004 - 05:17 PM
On the other hand - it would be a good chance for us all to see exactly what the AMD kits do and what they offer....180bhp NACan't we make the RR somewhere else so we can get independent results from cars that have been tuned by AMD?
G-Force for example.
#123
Posted 16 February 2004 - 07:44 AM
Totally agree! DAZ even seem to have less power than the original "Speedster" tested by the german Speedster forum which had 119/151 whp/lbft, probably due to the testing conditions and variation between vehicles.But Daz, your figures dont add up to it being at the wheels, the torque figure is a bit too low. Horsepower = torque x rpm / 5252. If you do the maths with what you've got you end up with about 120whp which would seem more likely.
If I shall go all the way to Great Britain to tune my car , from Sweden I have to know that it is worth the trip. Generally 10-12 % are lost in the transmission but people here quote up to 27 %, giving the a phenomenal crank figure in the calculations. I do not want to spend £700 on a trip and £300 on the remap and find that it was all a hoax.
.. or as Mani put it when someone pointed out that a real effect ca be felt from placebo (tuning) " Clearly placebo tuning doesnt work with everybody!!"
Edited by clipping_point, 16 February 2004 - 08:04 AM.
#124
Posted 16 February 2004 - 09:29 AM
#125
Posted 16 February 2004 - 10:31 AM
Attached Files
#126
Posted 20 February 2004 - 01:23 PM
Attached Files
Edited by rubber, 23 February 2004 - 11:11 PM.
#127
Posted 20 February 2004 - 08:36 PM
Edited by P11 COV, 20 February 2004 - 08:47 PM.
#128
Posted 21 February 2004 - 07:07 AM
#129
Posted 21 February 2004 - 09:46 AM
Yes I will, once I realize what I do wrong. It seems when I place the pics from my company browser they end up in this strange way! Also the window is really WIIIIDEEE when I look at it at my work. Is it the settings on my company computer?Can we re-size these pictures down to a reasonable size please.
#130
Posted 21 February 2004 - 11:32 AM
#131
Posted 21 February 2004 - 01:04 PM
Edited by P11 COV, 21 February 2004 - 01:05 PM.
#132
Posted 21 February 2004 - 02:56 PM
Attached Files
Edited by rubber, 23 February 2004 - 11:11 PM.
#133
Posted 21 February 2004 - 03:00 PM
#134
Posted 23 February 2004 - 11:24 AM
#135
Posted 23 February 2004 - 01:54 PM
Is it this ? :
#136
Posted 23 February 2004 - 05:40 PM
#137
Posted 23 February 2004 - 05:41 PM
#138
Posted 23 February 2004 - 05:48 PM
#139
Posted 23 February 2004 - 11:13 PM
#140
Posted 24 February 2004 - 03:16 PM
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users