Jump to content


Photo

0-60 & 0-100 Times


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#1 Oli

Oli

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 250 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 July 2008 - 12:24 PM

Was just wondering what the 0-60 and 0-100 times would be for my stage 2 tubby? anybody done any timed runs? I know its not only what the car is about but im just interested to know. cheers chinky chinky

#2 Jive

Jive

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 361 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Devon

Posted 25 July 2008 - 12:55 PM

We will probably struggle to match the quoted figures as with all manufactures they have no problems keeping their foot flat on the floor and thumping it through the gears, without the use of the clutch. Watched the making of the elise video and they destroyed a few transmissions getting their time. Having used that method in a couple company/hire cars it works well but i aint brave enough to do in it the vx.

#3 'Buchos'

'Buchos'

    Need to get Out More

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 792 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:N.Ireland

Posted 25 July 2008 - 02:23 PM

I'm getting 4.56secs 0-60 on the GtechPro. Thats with TC on and 227bhp, rolling roaded 12th July. (The RR figure may be low as we didn't have a fan on the intercooler so the boost tailed off quickly.)

#4 dw1

dw1

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,043 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 July 2008 - 03:06 PM

If you get one of these: www.perfomancebox.co.uk they're good to keep track of any of the changes you make to your car and they're also useful for track and generally a bit of a gadget :) It also shows the real world is a far cry from manufacturers stats. A friend of mine used it to try it on his Litchfield STi mega scooby and in three attempts the best he could get was 5.6 seconds - he was applying some mechanical sympathy and the car kept bogging down. I did it in my Stage 2 and launching from 2500 rpm got 5.2. In gear times give a better picture. Theoretical times for the Stage 2 in ideal conditions with semi slicks would be about 4.2 and 11. But that is purely pub talk.

#5 SteveA

SteveA

    .

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,156 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North East UK

Posted 25 July 2008 - 03:14 PM

Fastest I managed was 5.1 in my stage 2 using an ELM327 and OBDII software to monitor. That was without a full launch and before I got sticky tyres. Will have to do it again to see the difference.

#6 'Buchos'

'Buchos'

    Need to get Out More

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 792 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:N.Ireland

Posted 25 July 2008 - 03:43 PM

If you get one of these: www.perfomancebox.co.uk
.......


I'm using this >CLICKY< which is a bit cheaper than the P'Box, but has good reports for accuracy. 4.56 best and usually around the 4.9sec mark 0-60.

I feel I could pull that down if I didn't care about my clutch and gearbox (or could drive worth a toss :D ).

Edited by P40LVX, 25 July 2008 - 03:44 PM.


#7 Simply the Best

Simply the Best

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,660 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Living Hell
  • Interests:Time for it and everything associated to go.

Posted 25 July 2008 - 03:54 PM

Does it really matter how fast your car does these times in?

I mean would it really offend your ego so much - to know that you are already faster than most other cars on the road - that you want figures as well?

No offence - but if you're bothered, find out for yourself and either fit the bits to do the timing for you or dyno your car. Every car is going to be different so asking others what they get is a little vague. But I would like to think that Vaux didn't lie to us about top speed so why would they lie about 0 - 60 etc?

I'm in a very bad mood so please excuse me for my little grump.

:angry:

Edited by namaah_220, 25 July 2008 - 03:54 PM.


#8 covert ops

covert ops

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,265 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 July 2008 - 04:36 PM

Does it really matter how fast your car does these times in?

I mean would it really offend your ego so much - to know that you are already faster than most other cars on the road - that you want figures as well?

No offence - but if you're bothered, find out for yourself and either fit the bits to do the timing for you or dyno your car. Every car is going to be different so asking others what they get is a little vague. But I would like to think that Vaux didn't lie to us about top speed so why would they lie about 0 - 60 etc?

I'm in a very bad mood so please excuse me for my little grump.

:angry:



LOL Naamah!!!

(Any criminals out and about today.....you have been warned!!)

Andy chinky chinky

#9 drpau

drpau

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,899 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Northallerton

Posted 25 July 2008 - 05:37 PM

Does it really matter how fast your car does these times in?

I mean would it really offend your ego so much - to know that you are already faster than most other cars on the road - that you want figures as well?

No offence - but if you're bothered, find out for yourself and either fit the bits to do the timing for you or dyno your car. Every car is going to be different so asking others what they get is a little vague. But I would like to think that Vaux didn't lie to us about top speed so why would they lie about 0 - 60 etc?

I'm in a very bad mood so please excuse me for my little grump.

:angry:



Sometimes its just nice to know these things.

If you have a nokia N series phone with GPS you can get a symbian application called "racechrono", it uses the built in GPS and you can use it to calculate acceleration times, and other bits and bobs, you can also upload tracks to it via their website so you can assess laptimes on trackdays. Plus its free!!!!

#10 Initial D

Initial D

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 386 posts

Posted 25 July 2008 - 05:46 PM

My recent sold stage 2 with vxr turbo did it in: 0-60 - 4.47 4.16 4.34 0-100 - 10.2 10.58 10.06 Did this with my mate timing me on a stopwatch, so not 100% accurate, lol. :rolleyes:

Edited by Initial D, 25 July 2008 - 05:47 PM.


#11 Duncan VXR

Duncan VXR

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,282 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lincolnshire
  • Interests:Anything to do with making cars faster and better than the original

Posted 25 July 2008 - 05:51 PM

I feel an event brewing out of this topic ;) be really good to compare specs, but we all know its not all about straight line speed ;) I dont care so much what mine does but nice to know and agree to get the best time you really hurt the car :D My Stage 4 (never been a fan of the who stage 2,3,4 etc just set them up for what you want :D) before my recent mods was 0-113mph in 12.3secs ;) feel a high 11 is possible now :groupjump:

#12 Duncan VXR

Duncan VXR

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,282 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lincolnshire
  • Interests:Anything to do with making cars faster and better than the original

Posted 25 July 2008 - 05:52 PM

over a 1/4 mile that is ;) And the word 'whole' seems to be who lol

#13 'Buchos'

'Buchos'

    Need to get Out More

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 792 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:N.Ireland

Posted 25 July 2008 - 10:31 PM

Does it really matter how fast your car does these times in?
................


No.

What do you want to talk about instead :)

#14 Guy182

Guy182

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,459 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Grimsby

Posted 25 July 2008 - 11:12 PM

Posted Image

#15 EdButler

EdButler

    Super Duper Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 731 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sheffield

Posted 26 July 2008 - 09:24 AM

Guy, they wnted a 0-100, not a 0.160 to 99.520 :P ~9.5 seconds though, wow!

#16 Shamone

Shamone

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 372 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Skegness
  • Interests:Cars-VX220- Focus ST-Mini Cooper S - Bikes-Honda Hornet - Skiing

Posted 26 July 2008 - 02:26 PM

Guy, have you got the Courtney supercharger conversion? Mine's booked in on the 4th August so I hope so :groupjump:

#17 snoopstah

snoopstah

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,056 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver, BC

Posted 26 July 2008 - 04:06 PM

Guy, have you got the Courtney supercharger conversion?

Mine's booked in on the 4th August so I hope so :groupjump:

Stage 4 turbo IIRC.

#18 Shamone

Shamone

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 372 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Skegness
  • Interests:Cars-VX220- Focus ST-Mini Cooper S - Bikes-Honda Hornet - Skiing

Posted 26 July 2008 - 04:49 PM

mmm Wonder how a stage 4 turbo compares with a supercharged NA?

#19 drpau

drpau

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,899 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Northallerton

Posted 26 July 2008 - 04:59 PM

mmm Wonder how a stage 4 turbo compares with a supercharged NA?


Well you are talking 250hp vs about 295 I think. A tubby is approx 930kg and your NA(875kg) with the SC bits bolted on weighs (as a guesstimate) 890 that gives you
0.28bhp per kg and the tubby 0.32bhp per kg (If Ive worked it out right :rolleyes: ). So you have less power per kg.
That doesnt tell the whole story though cos youve got the torque to consider too.

#20 Joe-Turbo

Joe-Turbo

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,176 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rayleigh, Essex.

Posted 26 July 2008 - 07:18 PM

stage 4 tubby is about 320lbft i think?, no idea on the SC




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users