I'm there on the 25th.I have the pump kit fitted and will know next week what the outcome will be as am at CMS on 24th.

Posted 17 March 2010 - 10:44 AM
I'm there on the 25th.I have the pump kit fitted and will know next week what the outcome will be as am at CMS on 24th.
Posted 17 March 2010 - 10:45 AM
No, I think we settled on them being the same pump but that the 2.2 runs at a higher fuel rail pressure as standard (and they're also a few years older on the NA).did we ever agree about 2.2 fuel pumps being different to LET?
Posted 17 March 2010 - 10:49 AM
No, I think we settled on them being the same pump but that the 2.2 runs at a higher fuel rail pressure as standard (and they're also a few years older on the NA).
did we ever agree about 2.2 fuel pumps being different to LET?
Posted 17 March 2010 - 10:51 AM
Jon's meant to be getting back to me today to let me know when they will be ready, I'll ask him to give you a call if you like.
Oh well, at least there's now a decent solution thanks to Cliffie and Glencoe. Just need ProAlloy to do their bit. I must crack on and get my new pump and fuel lines installed as I'm over at North Walsham next week for a health check on the dyno. Will be good to get my missing rpm's restored one of these days.
Posted 17 March 2010 - 10:53 AM
Posted 17 March 2010 - 10:58 AM
Posted 17 March 2010 - 10:58 AM
Dunno. We're using VXT injectors already which you guys don't max at <=300bhp. Next step up for us is to use the LEH VXR injectors, which is what Nick has with his Harrop (don't know where MaxR's car is at with his 305bhp?).
Edited by siztenboots, 17 March 2010 - 11:01 AM.
Posted 17 March 2010 - 10:59 AM
Don't worry Chris. I've spoken to Jon a couple of times in the last week. I don't think the ProAlloy collar will really be needed but if it does surface at some point in the near future, I'll retrofit it (now I've got easy access to the pump with the tank still in place).Jon's meant to be getting back to me today to let me know when they will be ready, I'll ask him to give you a call if you like.
Posted 17 March 2010 - 11:12 AM
Don't worry Chris. I've spoken to Jon a couple of times in the last week. I don't think the ProAlloy collar will really be needed but if it does surface at some point in the near future, I'll retrofit it (now I've got easy access to the pump with the tank still in place).
Jon's meant to be getting back to me today to let me know when they will be ready, I'll ask him to give you a call if you like.
It will be exactly 12 months since ProAlloy had my car for a few weeks to "solve" the pump issue in the next couple of weeks.![]()
Posted 17 March 2010 - 11:24 AM
The circumference of the OE pump is slightly bigger than the replacement. Or to be exact, the base of the OE pump is wider than rest of the body and fits into the fuel pump canister exactly. The replacement doesn't have this wider bit at the base, so isn't an exact fit. ProAlloy are going to machine a collar that slips over the new pump body which will then make the replacement a tight fit into the canister to stop any movement. It sounds bad from that description but it's not in reality as the replacement pump has a sprung filter basket on the bottom to prevent it sitting on the bottom of the canister and the b*stard convoluted pipes on the top of the new pump stop it moving up and keep it under tension.What is this collar business all about then??
Posted 17 March 2010 - 11:26 AM
The circumference of the OE pump is slightly bigger than the replacement. Or to be exact, the base of the OE pump is wider than rest of the body and fits into the fuel pump canister exactly. The replacement doesn't have this wider bit at the base, so isn't an exact fit. ProAlloy are going to machine a collar that slips over the new pump body which will then make the replacement a tight fit into the canister to stop any movement. It sounds bad from that description but it's not in reality as the replacement pump has a sprung filter basket on the bottom to prevent it sitting on the bottom of the canister and the b*stard convoluted pipes on the top of the new pump stop it moving up and keep it under tension.
What is this collar business all about then??
Posted 17 March 2010 - 11:27 AM
Posted 17 March 2010 - 11:32 AM
Nothing's ever bl**dy easy with these cars!
The circumference of the OE pump is slightly bigger than the replacement. Or to be exact, the base of the OE pump is wider than rest of the body and fits into the fuel pump canister exactly. The replacement doesn't have this wider bit at the base, so isn't an exact fit. ProAlloy are going to machine a collar that slips over the new pump body which will then make the replacement a tight fit into the canister to stop any movement. It sounds bad from that description but it's not in reality as the replacement pump has a sprung filter basket on the bottom to prevent it sitting on the bottom of the canister and the b*stard convoluted pipes on the top of the new pump stop it moving up and keep it under tension.
What is this collar business all about then??
Posted 17 March 2010 - 11:32 AM
So does it actually need this collar or will Pro Alloy be ripping us poor Vx owners off again??
Posted 17 March 2010 - 11:35 AM
So does it actually need this collar or will Pro Alloy be ripping us poor Vx owners off again??
whats with all the negativity on there
Posted 17 March 2010 - 11:36 AM
Posted 17 March 2010 - 11:36 AM
Next step up for us is to use the LEH VXR injectors, which is what Nick has with his Harrop (don't know where MaxR's car is at with his 305bhp?).
Posted 17 March 2010 - 11:37 AM
bit of competition never hurt anyone
So does it actually need this collar or will Pro Alloy be ripping us poor Vx owners off again??
whats with all the negativity on there
i just feel PA take the biscuit with the prices of there work. Nearly £300 for a header thank where as Alloy Racing Fabrication was only £70.
Posted 17 March 2010 - 11:39 AM
Posted 17 March 2010 - 11:42 AM
Personally, I don't think it's necessary.So does it actually need this collar or will Pro Alloy be ripping us poor Vx owners off again??
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users