Edited by VXT Tim, 08 October 2011 - 10:30 AM.
Big Power Vxt Project
#841
Posted 08 October 2011 - 10:30 AM
#842
Posted 08 October 2011 - 12:21 PM
#843
Posted 08 October 2011 - 04:18 PM
Damn it, everything has come to a halt because I have foolishly snapped a bolt by over tightening it.
Bolts that snap when tightening up are waaaaay easier to undo than when they snap undoing. Drill and some easy outs or tap it round with a chisel or put a slot in it and screwdriver it.
The machine shop wont have any probs though. Worth getting 6 new bolts if your going to have to get 1 anyway?
#844
Posted 08 October 2011 - 05:01 PM
Bolts that snap when tightening up are waaaaay easier to undo than when they snap undoing. Drill and some easy outs or tap it round with a chisel or put a slot in it and screwdriver it.
The machine shop wont have any probs though. Worth getting 6 new bolts if your going to have to get 1 anyway?
It was heavily torqued up when the head of the bolt sheared off the threaded part. The remaining threaded part is not easy to get at either as it snapped about 7mm down in the hole. It will need drilling out carefully I think.
You are right that I need new bolts all round, they were only grade 8.8 steel, bloody useless. I need to get some 10.8 or better, though they really only need to take 25 NM on a standard clutch. As mine is a heavily beefed up unit, I was applying about 50 NM - hence it broke.
Can anyone confirm if they are 6mm or 7mm - every time I measure them they seem different
Edited by Nev, 08 October 2011 - 05:02 PM.
#845
Posted 08 October 2011 - 05:08 PM
That pressure plate must be mighty as there doesn't look anywhere near enough material to stick 500 odd lbft (or whatever it was)
TBH, it looks jolly similar to the Helix one. I guess the hardening process (which is invisible) must be where the difference lies. The sach fingers seem a little closer together as well, which may help, as there is more material pressing onto the plate.
My engine only pushes out 400 ft/lb anyway, much more than that would require fatter tyres and wheels which I'm not keen on splashing out on, as i need to stop spending money (and time!) on this project. Hopefully this will be the last time I have to do anything on the car for a few thousand miles (or more hopefully).
#846
Posted 08 October 2011 - 05:15 PM
#847
Posted 08 October 2011 - 06:29 PM
Nev, just had a quick read of your last post on the blog. If you suspect that oil is passing up the bolt threads using 243 probably won't fix the problem. As i'm sure you know it's only a threadlock, at work we use a Loctite 577 on threads that are going into oilways etc as it's a sealant.
I'm guessing the flywheel bolts don't already come with threadlock/patchlock on them? Obviously they'd need some applied, might be an idea to put some on them and let it dry overnight. Then add some 577 when you fit the bolts to try and hold back the oil?
The only other one you could look at is Loctite 572 this is a liquid ptfe, but i think the 577 might be a better choice.
Loctite data sheet lists 243 as thread lock and thread sealer.
243 works fine if used in the correct quantity and eveything is cleaned and de-greased(oil removed) with a brake cleaner type product.
Steve
#848
Posted 08 October 2011 - 06:55 PM
Loctite data sheet lists 243 as thread lock and thread sealer.
243 works fine if used in the correct quantity and eveything is cleaned and de-greased(oil removed) with a brake cleaner type product.
Steve
Not sure what data sheet you're reading from fella but 243 is only a threadlock AFAIK
Loctite 243
Loctite 243 medium strength threadlocker, suitable for all metal threaded assemblies, Breakaway torque 26Nm
http://www.loctite.c...D=1000000I81L#a
Not a sealant unlike 577
http://www.loctite.c...UID=1000000IY7U
#849
Posted 08 October 2011 - 07:00 PM
Can anyone confirm if they are 6mm or 7mm - every time I measure them they seem different
Be surprised if they are M7 tbh Nev, most clutch plates are M6.
Normally only find M7 on Jap motorbikes & some French manifold studs oddly.
Although going out to M7 (if you can get the bolts) might give you the oomph needed if you want to torque them down a bit more than standard.
#850
Posted 08 October 2011 - 07:04 PM
#851
Posted 08 October 2011 - 07:06 PM
#852
Posted 09 October 2011 - 07:44 AM
Loctite data sheet lists 243 as thread lock and thread sealer.
243 works fine if used in the correct quantity and eveything is cleaned and de-greased(oil removed) with a brake cleaner type product.
Steve
Not sure what data sheet you're reading from fella but 243 is only a threadlock AFAIK
Loctite 243
Loctite 243 medium strength threadlocker, suitable for all metal threaded assemblies, Breakaway torque 26Nm
http://www.loctite.c...D=1000000I81L#a
Not a sealant unlike 577
http://www.loctite.c...UID=1000000IY7U
If you look at http://www.loctite.c...ocking-4476.htm gives a summary of the product do, under the threadlocking title, Key characteristics of threadlockers, fourth one down 'Locks and seals all threads'.
Also if you phone/e-mail they will confrim.
If you click on 243 it opens to the same page you linked.
Steve
#853
Posted 09 October 2011 - 09:19 AM
Yes 243 is a threadlocker with improved oil tolerance but for Nevs particular application it's obviously not up to the job in hand. By only using threadlock the bolt thread still has a (albeit microscopic) air gap. This is why i'd think a propper sealant is what's needed also, an anaerobic thread sealant which "fills" the gap if you like and cures in the absence of air. Apologies if i sound like i'm trying to make you suck eggs so to speak.
Difference of opinions/understanding maybe mate but if you look:
Loctite 243
Technical Information
Applications Thread Sealing and Threadlocking > Threadlocking
Loctite 577
Technical Information
Applications Thread Sealing and Threadlocking > Thread Sealing
#854
Posted 09 October 2011 - 02:00 PM
If it was a sealant i'd think they'd put it in the Thread Sealing section rather than the Threadlocking.
Yes 243 is a threadlocker with improved oil tolerance but for Nevs particular application it's obviously not up to the job in hand. By only using threadlock the bolt thread still has a (albeit microscopic) air gap. This is why i'd think a propper sealant is what's needed also, an anaerobic thread sealant which "fills" the gap if you like and cures in the absence of air. Apologies if i sound like i'm trying to make you suck eggs so to speak.
Difference of opinions/understanding maybe mate but if you look:
Loctite 243
Technical Information
Applications Thread Sealing and Threadlocking > Threadlocking
Loctite 577
Technical Information
Applications Thread Sealing and Threadlocking > Thread Sealing
We can agree to disagree.
577 is under the sealant section with a low breakaway torque and it's main function is thread sealer.
As it clearly states on their web site that loctite thread lockers seal all types of thread, so it will stop the bolts from comming loose and seal the thread if used correctly.
Loctite reccomend it for thread locking and thread sealing, I asked the direct question as I wanted to find the correct locker/thread sealer fof my fuel pressure regulator.
Vauxhall/GM sell the equivalant 243 (it is blue in colour and smells the same)in their own packaging over the counter at the main dealers, for that very purpose of sealing and locking flywheel and other bolts.
Steve
#855
Posted 09 October 2011 - 04:10 PM
#856
Posted 09 October 2011 - 08:32 PM
#857
Posted 11 October 2011 - 02:29 PM
#858
Posted 11 October 2011 - 04:35 PM
#859
Posted 12 October 2011 - 08:05 PM
#860
Posted 12 October 2011 - 08:12 PM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users