Big Power Vxt Project
#1181
Posted 11 September 2012 - 07:15 PM
#1182
Posted 11 September 2012 - 07:22 PM
I didn't bother taking any as I have quite a few now. Though some girl taking pics of him asked me "what it would take to have a ride in him" - as her boyfriend was standing right next to her I didn't reply with what went through my head!
Cool story.
#1183
Posted 12 September 2012 - 05:52 PM
Edited by Nev, 12 September 2012 - 06:17 PM.
#1184
Posted 12 September 2012 - 05:57 PM
#1185
Posted 12 September 2012 - 06:23 PM
#1186
Posted 13 September 2012 - 09:00 AM
#1187
Posted 13 September 2012 - 09:40 AM
#1188
Posted 13 September 2012 - 12:04 PM
Edited by Nev, 13 September 2012 - 12:11 PM.
#1189
Posted 13 September 2012 - 12:44 PM
#1190
Posted 13 September 2012 - 12:51 PM
I have 2.5 on my rears (225's) and i find it doesnt allow the rear to wonder around, its very planted 3 is probably a bit too much tbh, i think mike had that much but reduced it down to something like 2.5.
Do you know your front and rear toe?
Id try keep backs same across the wheels (unless corner weighting)
Front and rear toe ins are setup exactly as I want (approx 340R road spec):
1) Fronts are toeing in by -0.3 mm (i.e. toeing OUT).
2) Rears are toeing in by 1.6 mm (i.e. toeing IN).
I forgot to mention that, on the whole the car seems to be hunting around in the lorry ruts a bit less, though this was only a mild improvement, as the steering wheel still had a life of its own unless gripped moderately firmly!
After all this fiddling about it would be great to drive a completely standard "out of the factory" car, just to see how different they are. I am sure that Nipper has now lost a fair bit of his nimbleness due to the fatter and heavier wheels/tyres, though the improvement in overal traction (particularily on smooth(ish)) "fast" tarmac outweights this factor IMO. Nimbleness on B-type roads doesn't really concern me too much, as my speed on such roads is dictated more by line of sight (which is usually short), so if I want to drive safely it is not the car's limits that hold me back, it's more common sense and ability to stop incase there is a tractor or cylist round the next bend that limits me. If I am going round any corner on a public road I usually do so on the assumption that there is a "notional pedestrian" in the middle of the road, because one day there really might be one for real !!
Edited by Nev, 13 September 2012 - 01:18 PM.
#1191
Posted 14 September 2012 - 09:48 AM
#1192
Posted 14 September 2012 - 09:51 AM
camber on mine f/r -1.5° and -2.5°
Same as mine
#1193
Posted 14 September 2012 - 11:52 AM
Edited by Nev, 14 September 2012 - 12:02 PM.
#1194
Posted 14 September 2012 - 11:59 AM
#1195
Posted 14 September 2012 - 12:03 PM
#1196
Posted 14 September 2012 - 03:37 PM
#1197
Posted 14 September 2012 - 04:01 PM
Went to Castle Coombe (Forge event) and had the car static noise tested. It made 102.7 dB at 4500 RPM (their limit on the day was 100 dB). Deep down however I know it is way noisier than that when on boost at 8000 RPM, so driveby tests would almost certainly fail me too (with an even larger margin of failure)
The solution would be to get a full silencer box welded back in (I only have a 1/2 sized box in there at the moment).
Would a full silencer have any other effects other than noise on nipper Nev?
#1198
Posted 14 September 2012 - 07:02 PM
#1199
Posted 18 September 2012 - 12:20 PM
Edited by Nev, 18 September 2012 - 12:31 PM.
#1200
Posted 18 September 2012 - 01:29 PM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users