PM'ed
ref sprockets
Are they these ones (#11)
HERE
Project Jerusalem
#221
Posted 21 October 2011 - 03:26 PM
#222
Posted 21 October 2011 - 04:37 PM
Latest parts arrived
Say what you see.....
I see my springs and top caps!
Saab sprockets are the same as Z22 ones just without the timing tab. The clamping force of the bolt is what keeps it in place. You could just grind out the tab, although if our Z22 sprockets are like mine you could have a couple of degrees tinkerage in there already. Just see how your cams time up.
#223
Posted 21 October 2011 - 05:08 PM
#224
Posted 21 October 2011 - 06:02 PM
'nay-slayers'
horse abuse?
#225
Posted 22 October 2011 - 06:26 PM
PM'ed
ref sprockets
Say what you see.....
I see my springs and top caps!
Saab sprockets are the same as Z22 ones just without the timing tab. The clamping force of the bolt is what keeps it in place. You could just grind out the tab, although if our Z22 sprockets are like mine you could have a couple of degrees tinkerage in there already. Just see how your cams time up.
Careful Jimmy, if you go over 250 BHP the 'nay-slayers' on here will giving you grief
Good luck with all the mods.
eh.... I'm already over 250bhp.
'nay-slayers'
horse abuse?
You and horses
#226
Posted 22 October 2011 - 06:30 PM
Careful Jimmy, if you go over 250 BHP the 'nay-slayers' on here will giving you grief
Good luck with all the mods.
That I doubt as most stage 2 Supercharged cars do that as do most stage 2 Tubbies.
I think the fingers poke when you make a car too powerful to drive in anger or round corners and too powerful for the drivetrain but hey, what do I know.
#227
Posted 22 October 2011 - 06:52 PM
Careful Jimmy, if you go over 250 BHP the 'nay-slayers' on here will giving you grief
Good luck with all the mods.
That I doubt as most stage 2 Supercharged cars do that as do most stage 2 Tubbies.
I think the fingers poke when you make a car too powerful to drive in anger or round corners and too powerful for the drivetrain but hey, what do I know.
Anything can be driven in anger!!! I'd love to take Nevs car out on track!
#228
Posted 22 October 2011 - 06:54 PM
Careful Jimmy, if you go over 250 BHP the 'nay-slayers' on here will giving you grief
Good luck with all the mods.
That I doubt as most stage 2 Supercharged cars do that as do most stage 2 Tubbies.
I think the fingers poke when you make a car too powerful to drive in anger or round corners and too powerful for the drivetrain but hey, what do I know.
Anything can be driven in anger!!! I'd love to take Nevs car out on track!
wouldnt want to drive it on the road though
#229
Posted 07 November 2011 - 08:26 PM
#230
Posted 07 November 2011 - 08:40 PM
Edited by MrSimba, 07 November 2011 - 08:42 PM.
#231
Posted 07 November 2011 - 08:47 PM
Edited by luke., 07 November 2011 - 08:48 PM.
#232
Posted 07 November 2011 - 08:50 PM
Cliffie, the car is quite well mapped by Klassen, it's quite possible to feather the throttle round the corners with just as much control as my old stage 4 tune. I think a SC car would be better though in general as it would be super controllable. I can understand why your chaps think it's too OTT, but in practice, once you learn it's power delivery, you can predict it's performance pretty well.
I have no doubt is is Nev and hats off to you fella for A. Building it and B. Being able to drive it.
If truth be told, I do kinda buy into "there can never be too much power" but I also know that you can have too much power for any specific chassis and it's limits.
I can't comment on Nipper as I have never been out in it and if you say it is drivable, I believe you. I only have 263 BHP and I thought mine was quick, yours must be mind altering.
#233
Posted 07 November 2011 - 08:59 PM
I can't comment on Nipper as I have never been out in it and if you say it is drivable, I believe you. I only have 263 BHP and I thought mine was quick, yours must be mind altering.
Mike honestly I've been getting used to 300bhp over the last few weeks which is a very quick car (0-100 in 7.5 seconds) but it feels sedate after pax'ing with Nev! It really is a sensory assault!
#234
Posted 07 November 2011 - 09:46 PM
I have no doubt is is Nev and hats off to you fella for A. Building it and B. Being able to drive it.
If truth be told, I do kinda buy into "there can never be too much power" but I also know that you can have too much power for any specific chassis and it's limits.
I can't comment on Nipper as I have never been out in it and if you say it is drivable, I believe you. I only have 263 BHP and I thought mine was quick, yours must be mind altering.
IMO the chassis is deffo not a limiting factor on the VX, it has a tortional ridgity of 11500 newton/metres per degree longitudinally, much more than any factory made monocoque design (spot or seam welded). Even something like an Ultima TIG welded spaceframe would not be much more than that, and the Ultima factory reckon their chassis is good for 1000 BHP (and was heavily used as a testbed by McLarren for the F1). Added to that I can feel that the chassis is quite fine when planting the power, no probs at all in straight lines or curves.
IMO the weak point is certainly the clutch and gearbox. The clutch could be remedied by fitting a TTV 7.25" fly and Supaclutch twin plate which would be good for around 625 BHP and around 450 ft/lb on my engine. That would only be £1200, so in the scale of things not so much.
If could afford a 3rd party gearbox with straight cut gears (ideally sequential as well), then I could fit something like 265 or 285 rear wheels (with arch extensions) and take the boost upto 2.5 bar and see what happened. I suspect the current turbo would make over 600 BHP at 8000 revs, and maybe 625 BHP at 8500 if I raised the RPM limit.
However, I aint that rich and there is clearly risk in pushing the engine up another 125 BHP, which is not really worth it IMO. I'd rather keep my current config and hope it lasts 20 or 30 thousand miles (or more hopfeully).
Edited by Nev, 07 November 2011 - 09:50 PM.
#235
Posted 07 November 2011 - 09:53 PM
Is that including the engine subframe? I know the tub itself is massively rigid but not so sure the subframe with it's 4 bolts holding it on is in quite the same league.IMO the chassis is deffo not a limiting factor on the VX, it has a tortional ridgity of 11500 newton/metres per degree longitudinally, much more than any factory made monocoque design (spot or seam welded). Even something like an Ultima TIG welded spaceframe would not be much more than that, and the Ultima factory reckon their chassis is good for 1000 BHP (and was heavily used as a testbed by McLarren for the F1). Added to that I can feel that the chassis is quite fine when planting the power, no probs at all in straight lines or curves.
#236
Posted 07 November 2011 - 09:56 PM
#237
Posted 07 November 2011 - 10:03 PM
Is that including the engine subframe? I know the tub itself is massively rigid but not so sure the subframe with it's 4 bolts holding it on is in quite the same league.
IMO the chassis is deffo not a limiting factor on the VX, it has a tortional ridgity of 11500 newton/metres per degree longitudinally, much more than any factory made monocoque design (spot or seam welded). Even something like an Ultima TIG welded spaceframe would not be much more than that, and the Ultima factory reckon their chassis is good for 1000 BHP (and was heavily used as a testbed by McLarren for the F1). Added to that I can feel that the chassis is quite fine when planting the power, no probs at all in straight lines or curves.
Hmm, you have a good point Techie, I've not really looked at how it's fixed. Peprhaps it's 4 bolts could be augmented with extras or maybe just make a new spaceframe to replace it. That said though, has anyone had it fail in any sort of way? I think it's main job is to provide 1 of 4 engine mounts and keep the exhaust pipe and clam from dropping on the floor.
#238
Posted 07 November 2011 - 10:28 PM
#239
Posted 07 November 2011 - 10:38 PM
Don't drag me into thisAtomX is in the process of making a new subframe to suit his project and his particular engine. I guess the whole point of the way the subframe is attached is that it separates in the event of a big accident (much like that Enzo that had the big smash in the States split into three pieces). Just looks a little when you have the clam off and see the two M12 bolts on each side, holding it to the tub. That said, I've no idea how normal/abnormal that is, as I've never seen the innards of another car, as often as this.
I have already stated that nev is in a different league to me
#240
Posted 07 November 2011 - 10:39 PM
Re: Nipper
When i went out in it, the first few miles Nev was warming it up....I said to him I thought it was very 'compliant' iirc. Not much different to my 2+ NA under 3k
Nev: 'It's a boost car mate'
On boost to rev limit nipper is a mentalist
Jules, I don't want to worry you, but I didnt take it to the rev limit when you were in it cos of the traffic and all those white hashing/lines on the centre of the main straight, I think we only went to about 6500 revs approx (which is only about 400 BHP). There will be a next time if you like
Edited by Nev, 07 November 2011 - 10:39 PM.
7 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users