Adventure No.2
#1781
Posted 12 March 2012 - 08:50 AM
#1782
Posted 12 March 2012 - 08:57 AM
#1783
Posted 12 March 2012 - 10:42 AM
probably tubby ears or door mirrors are widest part on mine
Door mirrors don't count.
#1784
Posted 12 March 2012 - 11:17 AM
#1785
Posted 12 March 2012 - 11:30 AM
Christ, now that is a diffuser!!!!
Mine's going to look fairly extreme, but nothing like that I don't think. 12 degrees is a good starting point for the rake of the diffuser by the way. As was said above, depends on what you're trying to do and how effective the wing is, as they can can be made to work together. I'm mounting mine so that I have a way of adjusting it up and down slightly.
Not trying to be devil's advocate, pure interest:
How would you ever know? How would you ever test without shitloads of data and telemetry to cross-reference?
Scenario: change the diffuser rake by 2 degrees and it feels epic. So leave it there. However, what we didnt know/realize is that the sun was out, warming up the track giving more grip ... and actually the 2 degree change was a change for the worse.
Although I love all the enthusiasm ... how do we all know it works / doesnt work without data to cross-check the feeling of the car?
...
And takes his negative / pessimistic hat off again ...
...
LOVE THE WAY IT LOOKS! You should do a JPS: Joe Player Special bodykit and sell it on .org
#1786
Posted 12 March 2012 - 11:42 AM
Edited by mbes2, 12 March 2012 - 11:44 AM.
#1787
Posted 12 March 2012 - 12:41 PM
Christ, now that is a diffuser!!!!
Mine's going to look fairly extreme, but nothing like that I don't think. 12 degrees is a good starting point for the rake of the diffuser by the way. As was said above, depends on what you're trying to do and how effective the wing is, as they can can be made to work together. I'm mounting mine so that I have a way of adjusting it up and down slightly.
Not trying to be devil's advocate, pure interest:
How would you ever know? How would you ever test without shitloads of data and telemetry to cross-reference?
Scenario: change the diffuser rake by 2 degrees and it feels epic. So leave it there. However, what we didnt know/realize is that the sun was out, warming up the track giving more grip ... and actually the 2 degree change was a change for the worse.
Although I love all the enthusiasm ... how do we all know it works / doesnt work without data to cross-check the feeling of the car?
...
And takes his negative / pessimistic hat off again ...
...
LOVE THE WAY IT LOOKS! You should do a JPS: Joe Player Special bodykit and sell it on .org
Well I'm no expert on the subject, but I have been giving this lots of thought recently whilst making upgrades to my car. I am also being helped a bit by a leading aerodynamicist who has lots of wind tunnel experience and CFD data/experience to hand. My aero won't look all that extreme compared to some of the Time Attack guys, but it will hopefully work extremely very well. Really it's just a case of sensibly maximising what's already available to us, rather than coming up with something completely new.
Regarding actually knowing if the diffuser, splitter and the wing are working well, there are a few things you can quite easily do on track which eliminate the other variables you mention. The one I'll be using is a bit of fluid droplet testing. Basically, just some coloured duck oil or similar which you place on the leading edge of the wing or on parts of the undertray, splitter etc to monitor what the air is doing and if it is staying attached to the surfaces in question. Easy to do and highlights when you make a change that doesn't work. Lots of info online on how to do it properly. Whether you would be able to physically feel the changes is questionable though.
Edited by jamiewillson, 12 March 2012 - 12:42 PM.
#1788
Posted 12 March 2012 - 12:47 PM
tempted to do this....
#1789
Posted 12 March 2012 - 01:09 PM
#1790
Posted 12 March 2012 - 01:10 PM
#1791
Posted 12 March 2012 - 01:13 PM
#1792
Posted 12 March 2012 - 01:14 PM
Edited by joe_589, 12 March 2012 - 01:15 PM.
#1793
Posted 12 March 2012 - 02:42 PM
Christ, now that is a diffuser!!!!
Mine's going to look fairly extreme, but nothing like that I don't think. 12 degrees is a good starting point for the rake of the diffuser by the way. As was said above, depends on what you're trying to do and how effective the wing is, as they can can be made to work together. I'm mounting mine so that I have a way of adjusting it up and down slightly.
Not trying to be devil's advocate, pure interest:
How would you ever know? How would you ever test without shitloads of data and telemetry to cross-reference?
Scenario: change the diffuser rake by 2 degrees and it feels epic. So leave it there. However, what we didnt know/realize is that the sun was out, warming up the track giving more grip ... and actually the 2 degree change was a change for the worse.
Although I love all the enthusiasm ... how do we all know it works / doesnt work without data to cross-check the feeling of the car?
...
And takes his negative / pessimistic hat off again ...
...
LOVE THE WAY IT LOOKS! You should do a JPS: Joe Player Special bodykit and sell it on .org
Well I'm no expert on the subject, but I have been giving this lots of thought recently whilst making upgrades to my car. I am also being helped a bit by a leading aerodynamicist who has lots of wind tunnel experience and CFD data/experience to hand. My aero won't look all that extreme compared to some of the Time Attack guys, but it will hopefully work extremely very well. Really it's just a case of sensibly maximising what's already available to us, rather than coming up with something completely new.
Regarding actually knowing if the diffuser, splitter and the wing are working well, there are a few things you can quite easily do on track which eliminate the other variables you mention. The one I'll be using is a bit of fluid droplet testing. Basically, just some coloured duck oil or similar which you place on the leading edge of the wing or on parts of the undertray, splitter etc to monitor what the air is doing and if it is staying attached to the surfaces in question. Easy to do and highlights when you make a change that doesn't work. Lots of info online on how to do it properly. Whether you would be able to physically feel the changes is questionable though.
Yeah funny you say that - I was once lectured on CFD and how it is changing for instance cooling design on cars as well. Often times, less is more!
Remember the 575 GT - even the hoodscoop was closed on the race car as too much airflow actually had a reverse effect on downforce and cooling...
(Yes, had to be the Dutch one
Jamie, you have pics of your car?
#1794
Posted 12 March 2012 - 02:44 PM
#1795
Posted 12 March 2012 - 03:22 PM
I am going to put a naca duct into my roof scoop to allow some air flow to keep me cool in the cabin due to the lack of windows
That'll be fun if it rains!!! I've fitted slider apertures into my side windows for that after also thinking about a naca duct in the scoop. What tyres you running Joe?
#1796
Posted 12 March 2012 - 03:25 PM
Christ, now that is a diffuser!!!!
Mine's going to look fairly extreme, but nothing like that I don't think. 12 degrees is a good starting point for the rake of the diffuser by the way. As was said above, depends on what you're trying to do and how effective the wing is, as they can can be made to work together. I'm mounting mine so that I have a way of adjusting it up and down slightly.
Not trying to be devil's advocate, pure interest:
How would you ever know? How would you ever test without shitloads of data and telemetry to cross-reference?
Scenario: change the diffuser rake by 2 degrees and it feels epic. So leave it there. However, what we didnt know/realize is that the sun was out, warming up the track giving more grip ... and actually the 2 degree change was a change for the worse.
Although I love all the enthusiasm ... how do we all know it works / doesnt work without data to cross-check the feeling of the car?
...
And takes his negative / pessimistic hat off again ...
...
LOVE THE WAY IT LOOKS! You should do a JPS: Joe Player Special bodykit and sell it on .org
Well I'm no expert on the subject, but I have been giving this lots of thought recently whilst making upgrades to my car. I am also being helped a bit by a leading aerodynamicist who has lots of wind tunnel experience and CFD data/experience to hand. My aero won't look all that extreme compared to some of the Time Attack guys, but it will hopefully work extremely very well. Really it's just a case of sensibly maximising what's already available to us, rather than coming up with something completely new.
Regarding actually knowing if the diffuser, splitter and the wing are working well, there are a few things you can quite easily do on track which eliminate the other variables you mention. The one I'll be using is a bit of fluid droplet testing. Basically, just some coloured duck oil or similar which you place on the leading edge of the wing or on parts of the undertray, splitter etc to monitor what the air is doing and if it is staying attached to the surfaces in question. Easy to do and highlights when you make a change that doesn't work. Lots of info online on how to do it properly. Whether you would be able to physically feel the changes is questionable though.
Yeah funny you say that - I was once lectured on CFD and how it is changing for instance cooling design on cars as well. Often times, less is more!
Remember the 575 GT - even the hoodscoop was closed on the race car as too much airflow actually had a reverse effect on downforce and cooling...
(Yes, had to be the Dutch one
Jamie, you have pics of your car?
I've got a website I made up a few weeks ago with a few pics on.
http://thimotorsport.co.uk
#1797
Posted 12 March 2012 - 06:19 PM
Christ, now that is a diffuser!!!!
Mine's going to look fairly extreme, but nothing like that I don't think. 12 degrees is a good starting point for the rake of the diffuser by the way. As was said above, depends on what you're trying to do and how effective the wing is, as they can can be made to work together. I'm mounting mine so that I have a way of adjusting it up and down slightly.
Not trying to be devil's advocate, pure interest:
How would you ever know? How would you ever test without shitloads of data and telemetry to cross-reference?
Scenario: change the diffuser rake by 2 degrees and it feels epic. So leave it there. However, what we didnt know/realize is that the sun was out, warming up the track giving more grip ... and actually the 2 degree change was a change for the worse.
Although I love all the enthusiasm ... how do we all know it works / doesnt work without data to cross-check the feeling of the car?
...
And takes his negative / pessimistic hat off again ...
...
LOVE THE WAY IT LOOKS! You should do a JPS: Joe Player Special bodykit and sell it on .org
Well I'm no expert on the subject, but I have been giving this lots of thought recently whilst making upgrades to my car. I am also being helped a bit by a leading aerodynamicist who has lots of wind tunnel experience and CFD data/experience to hand. My aero won't look all that extreme compared to some of the Time Attack guys, but it will hopefully work extremely very well. Really it's just a case of sensibly maximising what's already available to us, rather than coming up with something completely new.
Regarding actually knowing if the diffuser, splitter and the wing are working well, there are a few things you can quite easily do on track which eliminate the other variables you mention. The one I'll be using is a bit of fluid droplet testing. Basically, just some coloured duck oil or similar which you place on the leading edge of the wing or on parts of the undertray, splitter etc to monitor what the air is doing and if it is staying attached to the surfaces in question. Easy to do and highlights when you make a change that doesn't work. Lots of info online on how to do it properly. Whether you would be able to physically feel the changes is questionable though.
Yeah funny you say that - I was once lectured on CFD and how it is changing for instance cooling design on cars as well. Often times, less is more!
Remember the 575 GT - even the hoodscoop was closed on the race car as too much airflow actually had a reverse effect on downforce and cooling...
(Yes, had to be the Dutch one
Jamie, you have pics of your car?
I've got a website I made up a few weeks ago with a few pics on.
http://thimotorsport.co.uk
Nice!
Do you not have a dayjob or gf ;-)
Your commitment is very impressive!!
#1798
Posted 12 March 2012 - 06:28 PM
Nice!
Do you not have a dayjob or gf ;-)
Your commitment is very impressive!!
#1799
Posted 12 March 2012 - 06:32 PM
#1800
Posted 12 March 2012 - 07:33 PM
tow barge has landed!
Edited by joe_589, 12 March 2012 - 07:33 PM.
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users
-
Bing (1)