2005 Calendar Photos
#1
Posted 17 May 2004 - 04:04 AM
#2
Posted 17 May 2004 - 07:06 AM
Attached Files
Edited by exjagman, 23 June 2004 - 04:03 PM.
#3
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:58 AM
Attached Files
Edited by exjagman, 23 June 2004 - 04:05 PM.
#4
Posted 17 May 2004 - 04:52 PM
Attached Files
Edited by exjagman, 23 June 2004 - 04:06 PM.
#5
Posted 17 May 2004 - 05:29 PM
#6
Posted 17 May 2004 - 05:31 PM
Attached Files
Edited by exjagman, 23 June 2004 - 04:08 PM.
#7
Posted 17 May 2004 - 07:37 PM
Edited by exjagman, 23 June 2004 - 04:10 PM.
#8
Posted 17 May 2004 - 08:23 PM
1. We'd better decide that soon!!! I'm easy – shall we have a vote on it or just let everyone post pics they think are good and then choose later on that basis?1. aspect ratio needs to be agreed... ...repeat the format used last year?
2. resoltion isn't high enough to print at decent enough quality.
2. My pic on the March page of the 2003 calendar was 2.2Mb – pretty much a minimum I reckon... must set my camera to max resolution
Exjagman, you seem to know your stuff – would you have the capacity/infrafstructure to take the responsibility of sorting the hard details for us all?
Edit to say: I know you said ONLY post pics here, Thorney but I think we need to agree these details soon really.
Edited by speedyK, 17 May 2004 - 08:26 PM.
#9
Posted 17 May 2004 - 08:25 PM
>>>>>>>>>>
http://www.vx220.org...&f=6&t=8309&hl=
I quite like the ones outside of the hotel
Evad
#10
Posted 17 May 2004 - 08:35 PM
Edited by exjagman, 23 June 2004 - 04:11 PM.
#11
Posted 17 May 2004 - 08:38 PM
Had a bit of a play with this one from that thread – quite promising composition if the resolution of the orig. is enough for exjagman...I quite like the ones outside of the hotel
Attached Files
Edited by exjagman, 23 June 2004 - 04:12 PM.
#12
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:45 PM
duncan that shows real promise for something new and different!Repost in the right thread...
you find the right floor and the right building and you have something really special i think...
great work as it stands - upto you if you try and fine tune it!
#13
Posted 18 May 2004 - 07:14 AM
#14
Posted 18 May 2004 - 07:39 AM
#15
Posted 18 May 2004 - 08:19 AM
I think we need two resolutions:Can I suggest that a specification be set. Files that look good on a web page might not be good enough to repro.
1) a low res to post on this web site - poor s*ds like me can't get broadband in this bit of Milton Keynes (thanks BT!) and these pics takes ages to download;
2) a high res for reproduction so that successful offerings can be emailed or otherwise sent to the coordinator or printer.
#16
Posted 18 May 2004 - 10:13 AM
I would be happy for folks to email/send their large files to me to give them theExjagman, you seem to know your stuff – would you have the capacity/infrafstructure to take the responsibility of sorting the hard details for us all?
Edit to say: I know you said ONLY post pics here, Thorney but I think we need to agree these details soon really.
I also run special noise reduction software for files that are a bit on the rough side, so I wouldn't excude any image if it can be improved.
If anyone is using good old fashioned film, I would be happy to drum scan your negs or slides FOC within reason
I am also prepared to make a web site to upload entries to, so that they can be viewed full screen one at a time to avoid clogging this site up and avoiding more bandwidth problems.
For security, the url would would only be available to members on request to avoid the images getting ripped off If future submissions are as good as these so far, I feel quite strongly that they should not end up being published elsewhere.
In addition, they should also be clearly watermarked like the example, but with a copyright symbol included.
We could have an image size limited 400 pixels on here and that would be enough to let people see the entries. That would also be better for guys like VIX that do not have broadband.
So to sum up, if everything is sent to me, i'll take care of QC, watermarking and returning a 400 pixel image to the member to submit.
Attached Files
#17
Posted 18 May 2004 - 07:51 PM
#18
Posted 18 May 2004 - 08:39 PM
#19
Posted 18 May 2004 - 09:30 PM
Attached Files
#20
Posted 18 May 2004 - 11:21 PM
Horizontal or vertical, and what approx ratio?
I took this one this evening – I live in the place that is catching the sun at the end of the lake just visible above my Speedster's roof.
Attached Files
Edited by exjagman, 23 June 2004 - 04:13 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users