data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09474/094744f71827e58ed46e76403dc29865a748dac9" alt="thumbsup"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09474/094744f71827e58ed46e76403dc29865a748dac9" alt="thumbsup"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09474/094744f71827e58ed46e76403dc29865a748dac9" alt="thumbsup"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9919/f9919a33442ff9722fc68c825c0ec839de23bd8c" alt=":D"
Posted 05 August 2011 - 02:17 PM
Posted 05 August 2011 - 04:03 PM
Posted 05 August 2011 - 06:07 PM
Haha. No, never saw this before. (Running in "NA mode" with an open turbo...)
But triggered by this succesful conversion I re-performed my queste and found that Trifecta now offers the LNF tunes in stand alone applications for swap projects.![]()
![]()
![]()
(So 2,2NA's now have the possibility to outperform the VXT guys with the latest technology; VVT & DI, 260Hp in standard trim and 300+Hp with some ecu tuning stage)
Posted 06 August 2011 - 04:19 PM
Posted 06 August 2011 - 06:37 PM
Maybe now is the time to get in on a projectGosh the LNF really is a big step forward. Such a shame it has cast pistons in it though. However once you swap them to forged, that would be a great engine to make pig power.
Posted 06 August 2011 - 08:07 PM
Edited by Nev, 06 August 2011 - 08:08 PM.
Posted 06 August 2011 - 08:25 PM
Posted 08 August 2011 - 09:53 PM
Gosh the LNF really is a big step forward. Such a shame it has cast pistons in it though. However once you swap them to forged, that would be a great engine to make pig power.
Posted 09 August 2011 - 09:21 AM
Posted 09 August 2011 - 06:38 PM
Hi Martynas,
I think 450 BHP sounds good for medium sized tracks.
What class restrictions do you have in the races you enter?
What width tyres do you have on the car at the moment, as I think 450 BHP (approx 375 ft/lb of torque) will need much more rubber than the standard width 225 mm rear tyres, especially in the wet.
I imagine that replacing the F23 gearbox with a dogbox will be very expensive, I don't like to think how much you have already spent on your car. Presumably you will also install straight cut gears to reduce the frictional losses and increase strength ?
Nev.
Posted 09 August 2011 - 08:15 PM
Posted 09 August 2011 - 08:46 PM
Try 'the gearbox man'. Always worth dropping an email.
Nev, aren't straight cut gears weaker than helical? Smaller contact area. Perhaps I've got my thinking wrong. Whine like a small child in a sweet shop too. Having had a straight cut box I'll stick with the transmission losses!
Posted 09 August 2011 - 08:51 PM
Posted 10 August 2011 - 05:45 AM
Your car is amazing!Sorry I can't share it, because it is light-weight wing made from alluminium using old technology and it's only one. But I could upload a few pictures from the process, if interested.
Posted 10 August 2011 - 12:23 PM
Posted 10 August 2011 - 03:23 PM
Posted 12 August 2011 - 04:48 PM
Your car is amazing!
Sorry I can't share it, because it is light-weight wing made from alluminium using old technology and it's only one. But I could upload a few pictures from the process, if interested.
I have a small favour to ask.
The car next to you in this image, do you know where I could find more pictures of it? I'd love to see all it's decals.
Thanks.
Posted 12 August 2011 - 05:04 PM
Helical gear are stronger, but sraight cut do not longitudinal load on the bearings and on the gearbox housing.http://www.gearboxman.co.uk/
Mostly ford and V8 stuff but worth an email.
I thought a helical gear was stronger as each tooth is longer and has more metal conecting it to the gear. Perhaps my thinking is a bit off.
Posted 12 August 2011 - 05:09 PM
Posted 12 August 2011 - 05:47 PM
We expected that the difference will be larger, but proved that the weight is almost the samemay i ask, do you know the weight differences between the standard engine and this one? heavier/lighter in total?
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users