Lotus 116 Racing Project
#121
Posted 05 August 2011 - 02:17 PM
#122
Posted 05 August 2011 - 04:03 PM
#123
Posted 05 August 2011 - 06:07 PM
Haha. No, never saw this before. (Running in "NA mode" with an open turbo...)
But triggered by this succesful conversion I re-performed my queste and found that Trifecta now offers the LNF tunes in stand alone applications for swap projects.
(So 2,2NA's now have the possibility to outperform the VXT guys with the latest technology; VVT & DI, 260Hp in standard trim and 300+Hp with some ecu tuning stage)
Yep I saw it a few weeks ago and must say I have been tempted reselling my Motec to fund a LNF... but I'll stick with N/A R&D which is much more fun
#124
Posted 06 August 2011 - 04:19 PM
#125
Posted 06 August 2011 - 06:37 PM
Maybe now is the time to get in on a projectGosh the LNF really is a big step forward. Such a shame it has cast pistons in it though. However once you swap them to forged, that would be a great engine to make pig power.
Maybe I'll wait till it's tried and tested
#126
Posted 06 August 2011 - 08:07 PM
Edited by Nev, 06 August 2011 - 08:08 PM.
#127
Posted 06 August 2011 - 08:25 PM
#128
Posted 08 August 2011 - 09:53 PM
Gosh the LNF really is a big step forward. Such a shame it has cast pistons in it though. However once you swap them to forged, that would be a great engine to make pig power.
I do not know how powerfull is pig, but our target is 450 horses
#129
Posted 09 August 2011 - 09:21 AM
#130
Posted 09 August 2011 - 06:38 PM
Hi Martynas,
I think 450 BHP sounds good for medium sized tracks.
What class restrictions do you have in the races you enter?
What width tyres do you have on the car at the moment, as I think 450 BHP (approx 375 ft/lb of torque) will need much more rubber than the standard width 225 mm rear tyres, especially in the wet.
I imagine that replacing the F23 gearbox with a dogbox will be very expensive, I don't like to think how much you have already spent on your car . Presumably you will also install straight cut gears to reduce the frictional losses and increase strength ?
Nev.
Hi, Nev
Michelin Slicks 24x64-18 front, rear 25x64-18. Transmission now is the biggest headache. We are looking for used sinchro dog box for a decent price.
#131
Posted 09 August 2011 - 08:15 PM
#132
Posted 09 August 2011 - 08:46 PM
Try 'the gearbox man'. Always worth dropping an email.
Nev, aren't straight cut gears weaker than helical? Smaller contact area. Perhaps I've got my thinking wrong. Whine like a small child in a sweet shop too. Having had a straight cut box I'll stick with the transmission losses!
Who's the 'gearbox man' please - someone on this website ?
Straight cut gears are stronger and more efficient (ie less frictional losses), but you are right, they are noisy.
#133
Posted 09 August 2011 - 08:51 PM
#134
Posted 10 August 2011 - 05:45 AM
Your car is amazing!Sorry I can't share it, because it is light-weight wing made from alluminium using old technology and it's only one. But I could upload a few pictures from the process, if interested.
I have a small favour to ask.
The car next to you in this image, do you know where I could find more pictures of it? I'd love to see all it's decals.
Thanks.
#135
Posted 10 August 2011 - 12:23 PM
#136
Posted 10 August 2011 - 03:23 PM
#137
Posted 12 August 2011 - 04:48 PM
Your car is amazing!
Sorry I can't share it, because it is light-weight wing made from alluminium using old technology and it's only one. But I could upload a few pictures from the process, if interested.
I have a small favour to ask.
The car next to you in this image, do you know where I could find more pictures of it? I'd love to see all it's decals.
Thanks.
http://www.spykersquadron.com/
#138
Posted 12 August 2011 - 05:04 PM
Helical gear are stronger, but sraight cut do not longitudinal load on the bearings and on the gearbox housing.http://www.gearboxman.co.uk/
Mostly ford and V8 stuff but worth an email.
I thought a helical gear was stronger as each tooth is longer and has more metal conecting it to the gear. Perhaps my thinking is a bit off.
#139
Posted 12 August 2011 - 05:09 PM
#140
Posted 12 August 2011 - 05:47 PM
We expected that the difference will be larger, but proved that the weight is almost the samemay i ask, do you know the weight differences between the standard engine and this one? heavier/lighter in total?
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users